Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 677litre

Pages: [1] 2
1
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 18, 2018, 09:46:33 AM »
Show and shine cruiser, the eye candy might be more valuable than the loss of power on the tunnel wedge , if your not a hard core driver the Cool Factor of the t-wedge might be worth having

I know.  This car is turning out to be more of a big show than driver.  FYI, it's in the build stage.  Pretty rare 67 Cougar, factory sunroof, 4 speed, cruise, AC, FE car etc etc.

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 18, 2018, 09:43:20 AM »
It's been ported, just FYI. Probably not a problem on your C6 heads, but just something to be aware of.

Just curious, is it your manifold your selling?  If so any history of it is always appreciated.

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 17, 2018, 07:24:02 PM »
There's a C7ZX on epay now $625 was the bid I saw it at ( not mine).

2x4?  Have a link?  Couldn't see any when I searched.

Here's a C7ZX-A on eBay, only $563 at the moment, looks like the exhaust crossover needs attention, but that wouldn't necessarily scare me if the price is right. Cosmetically a little rough near the casting number.

Unless I'm missing something I don't see a link.

Oops, senior moment lol. I fixed it above. Here it is too:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1967-1968-Ford-Mustang-Shelby-CJ-SCJ-428-dual-quad-intake-manifold-C7ZX-9425-A/362314181217?epid=1423074750&hash=item545b9baa61:g:8XgAAOSw7eda8cr6

Thanks, now I see it.  Looks like it's seen better days.  Too bad they only ship to the US.  I'm in Canada. :(  I could ship it to a parcel service though.... 

4
FE Technical Forum / Re: Will FPA Tri-Y headers support 700hp?
« on: May 17, 2018, 05:51:08 PM »
I like my FPA tri-ys in my 67 Cougar and was going to say what others said, talk to Stan or FPA and get them to make a set with larger tubes.

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 17, 2018, 05:45:42 PM »
What's the best streetable gear you'd run?


I think 3.70s are a good compromise between performance and streetability.  Of course Ford put up to 4.30s in their performance cars of the era, but those are pretty tough to deal with at highway speeds.  Even 3.50s would be a major improvement over the gears you have now...

If I were to change out the gear, (I have access to 3:70s), I'm guess the intake is still not a good choice for a weekend street toy correct?    I can see why, given the design, that it would be for big cubic drag cars.

6
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 17, 2018, 05:43:35 PM »
There's a C7ZX on epay now $625 was the bid I saw it at ( not mine).

2x4?  Have a link?  Couldn't see any when I searched.

Here's a C7ZX-A on eBay, only $563 at the moment, looks like the exhaust crossover needs attention, but that wouldn't necessarily scare me if the price is right. Cosmetically a little rough near the casting number.

Unless I'm missing something I don't see a link.

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 17, 2018, 01:33:42 PM »
There's a C7ZX on epay now $625 was the bid I saw it at ( not mine).

2x4?  Have a link?  Couldn't see any when I searched.

8
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 17, 2018, 01:23:27 PM »
What's the best streetable gear you'd run?

I've been looking for a reasonably priced C7ZX-9425-A or repop of it for along time with no luck. Was hoping one of these might be streetable but it looks like a big no. :(  Any leads on a C7ZX-9425-A would be appreciated.

9
FE Technical Forum / Tunnel Wedge intake, how streetable?
« on: May 17, 2018, 11:13:51 AM »
Considering buying a BBM Tunnel Wedge intake but concerned about it's street manors.  Would be going on a 30 over 428, I haven't decided if I'm going to install a stroker kit but it might be an option.  Heads are currently a set of C6ae-Rs with 2.09 1.65 valves.  Cam will be hydraulic roller but I haven't chosen grind yet.  Car is 67 Cougar with 4 speed.  Rear gears are 2.73s (may change).  Car will be a weekend show/shine cruiser.  Would like some opinions and thoughts on combos before spending the cash. Jay thoughts??

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« on: May 12, 2016, 07:28:03 PM »

With regards to the factory cast but not machined  thermactor ports on these,  I'm still not sure if they are solid or actually open on these castings.

Pretty sure they are solid, but if not you would see a hole on the top of the head casting, over each exhaust port.  And if that hole is there, it can be threaded and plugged. 

I've put 2.19/1.71 valves into a 4.09 bore before, with Edelbrock heads, and they barely fit.  390 and 428 spacing on the valves is 2.0", and 427 spacing is 2.1"; if I recall correctly Edelbrock split the difference on their 428CJ heads, and they measure 2.05" spacing. 

Unless you are going all out with the porting, I think the standard CJ valves will be fine.  And you really won't pick up much from the 11/32" valves in terms of flow, but you will get a weight reduction.  If you are not going to run the engine past 6000 RPM, probably not worth the switch.

Jay, so I think I'm shooting for 2.15 / 1.65 both 45 deg seats, a good valve job and as much porting as possible.  The motor should have enough down low being a stroker (462) and I'm probably going to install one of BBMs new tunnel wedge intakes when they come out the end of June.  I'm still on the fence with regards to installing hardened exhaust seats, there is not a lot of meat in that area on the Rs to install them and at the same time go to the valve sizes I'm after.  The car will be a weekend toy but I like to go for lone cruises come weekends.

Can anyone post or point me to some good pictures of porting work on these heads??


11
FE Technical Forum / Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« on: April 04, 2016, 01:28:38 PM »
Some of you may have responded to this question on another site but I need input.

C6AE-Rs  - I'm being told that 2.19 intake valves will be too big for these heads and be very shrouded and have the same issue as the 2.15 and spark plug ports.  2.15 with 45deg seats would be better but are extremely close to the spark plug ports and prone to cracking in that area as a result.  Thoughts?

I'm pretty sure CJ sized exhaust valves are the way to go but are hardened exhaust seats required??  For street and cruising with the occasional strip run?

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cast Iron Cylinder Heads
« on: March 08, 2016, 06:46:21 PM »
A set of early iron heads can be done really good for under 1k. I've done this recently. They will out flow an out of the box Ed but you give up a little with the old combustion chambers. A pair of C1AE-A or C4AE-G castings are what I would start with. They're plentiful and cheap. Alexsparts.com has stainless 427 LR valves for $159.95 shipped. That's intake and exhaust. They have to be turned down to 2.15 intake and 1.65 exhaust so they don't kiss each other. A competent machine shop can easily handle the rest.

Sorry to butt-in on this thread.  :)

Kevin, I'll be doing up a set of C6AE-R (14 bolt), do you recommend 40/45 deg intake valves in the size you show?  Going on a stroked out 428 (462+).  Also, I think I've read and understand the best areas to clean and open the ports on these but any recommendation are appreciated.


677- I've never messed with a C6AE-R casting. But I have had several sets in my hands over the years. They always looked starved for port cross section to me. I wouldn't try to put such a big intake valve in that port. I'd go with CJ size valves with a 45.

Sorry for skankin' up your thread Mark.


Thanks, I just brought it up because Mark was inquiring about CJ heads and I've always been told the C6AE-Rs were the poor man's CJ head.  I can see why after looking at both, the Rs just require the so called "Fairlane lip" in the exhaust to be removed (very little work) to be almost identical to the CJs if the CJ valves are installed.  The R's seem to be more readily available and less expensive than the CJs.

13
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cast Iron Cylinder Heads
« on: March 04, 2016, 04:27:08 PM »
A set of early iron heads can be done really good for under 1k. I've done this recently. They will out flow an out of the box Ed but you give up a little with the old combustion chambers. A pair of C1AE-A or C4AE-G castings are what I would start with. They're plentiful and cheap. Alexsparts.com has stainless 427 LR valves for $159.95 shipped. That's intake and exhaust. They have to be turned down to 2.15 intake and 1.65 exhaust so they don't kiss each other. A competent machine shop can easily handle the rest.

Sorry to butt-in on this thread.  :)

Kevin, I'll be doing up a set of C6AE-R (14 bolt), do you recommend 40/45 deg intake valves in the size you show?  Going on a stroked out 428 (462+).  Also, I think I've read and understand the best areas to clean and open the ports on these but any recommendation are appreciated.

482?  So are you taking a 428 block .055 over to achieve that?  Is that safe on a stock block with such thin walls?

14
FE Technical Forum / Re: Where to find this decal?
« on: March 04, 2016, 04:07:39 PM »
Anyone know the source of this?

http://cgfordparts.com/wwwsectionfiles/cg_cat2_decals_valve_cover.html

http://www.ebay.com/itm/FORD-460-EAGLE-VALVE-COVER-DECALS-PAIR-/121892265052

And few more, just Google ford 427 valve cover decal.  I think they even sell complete valve covers with the decal on already.

15
FE Technical Forum / Re: pcv line worries
« on: February 27, 2016, 07:25:35 PM »
my pcv is hooked up on one end to the pass side valve cover,but im worried about the other end. its hooked to a port on the top of the number 4 runner on the intake. my carb has no ports on it for this. am i ok or do i need to change something

When you say on the top of the runner how close are we talking to where the head and intake ports meet?  My opinion is that you want it on a port as central as possible so the vacuum is coming from all intake paths rather than just one.  If you don't have a intake port on the manifold closer to the carb then a simple solution is to just use a carb spacer with the PVC port as part of it.  This was a standard piece on a lot of Fords.  Shouldn't be hard to find one.

Some picks of PVC setups from the factory. http://mansfieldmustang.com/EnginePCV.html

Pages: [1] 2