Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 427LX

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 19
1
Are you running one to one carb linkage or factory progressive type? If progressive, the medium risers and low risers employed the balance hose. ( I don’t know about high risers).
Some aftermarket vac pods do not have nipples. I don’t run a connecting hose on my set up. ( no nipples, pods have opening rate adjustment screws).
I confirm both secondaries open. I run one to one linkage.

I run 1 to 1 linkage. Took it out this evening and had a contact switch mounted at each carb secondary link. Hit it in a 2nd gear roll and both indicator lights lit up at same time. They were set to make contact at about half open. Loved it and it pulled hard lighting up the drag radials!

2
Okay when running the Tunnel Wedge intake manifold and a pair of vac. secondary Holley carbs is that balance connection really needed?  Now on the Chrysler
 426 Hemi with cross ram intake they ran fine without it with their 770 cfm vac. secondary carbs. The cross ram was like a pair of 4 cylinder engines running and same might be said with the
Tunnel Wedge looking like a pair of separate four runner intake manifolds. So how did both run well with and without.

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: 428 cam section
« on: August 24, 2025, 11:53:42 AM »
Why not add a stroker crank assembly to the block you have...like 445. Power and torque where you can use on the street in a light Cobra....scary FUN !

4
I have an idea to mount a small 12V servo motor to connect to the choke shaft. You could work it at a variable rate with a control like a volume control. Have plenty of area to mount it to on base plate.

5
I have to come here to try and get good info on the characteristics of the tunnel wedge intake design. I have my custom made intake of same design but made to fit
the 9.5 deck Windsor engines of 351 thru 440 cube stroker versions...mine being 427.

Now what I have going on is the intake is very cold natured on startup even on an 85 degree day.  With the idle and cruise A/F at 13.4 to 14 at normal 180 F temp it runs fine with great response running off front carb in a progressive linkage setup on a pair of Holley 770 CFM carbs with vac. secondary.

On first startup I have to keep RPM in the 1800- 2000 range to keep it running at a 14.9 range...higher RPM the richer it is. Anything below 1500 and it sputters at 16 A/F ratio. As it comes up to temp it will settle down at it's 1000 rpm idle at a 13.4 A/F. Drive  it and then after a 20 minute shutdown with engine still warm  you still have to keep the RPM up to 1500 for a decent fast idle and then it will settle down to it's normal running. No chokes on the carbs. I tried a manual Holley made  choke and it did do the job but the pivoting cable lock and flex from even a solid cable did not let the choke blade fully open...too much slop.

Now on a cold startup I plug in my engine coolant heater which I used on my other intake during chilly temps to heat the intake and that helps. Other than this it pulls like crazy above 4000 RPM!
Note....carb jetting is now 76 Primary and 84 in Secondary both carbs.  Stock .075 IAB and stock R-3310 idle fuel jet. Idle screws  1 turn out all around.

Do you guys that run the FE 427 Tunnel Wedge intake on the street have same issues or is mine a strange case? Thanks for any help!

6
My dual feed setup works great and no leak issues! I use the Gates EFI type rubber hose as it has a better liner for E10 and higher fuels.

7
Well I was impressed with the results and that's all that matters! Was my idea to have it made.

8
    Just out of curiosity, do you know which example of the "Holley 830"?   ???

    Scott.

No I don't. It was the dyno shop carb and I wasn't there during the runs. Does it make a difference?

9
One of the guys did a dyno compare on his hot street 418W. Victor Jr. with 830 Holley vs. the Tunnel Wedge with a pair of Holley 465 carbs.  The Tunnel Wedge was bolted on
right out the box with no port matching or other work. 1 inch 4 hole spacers on the intake and heads were AFR 205 I believe.  Took some jetting changes to try and get the cylinder A/F as close as possible as O2 sensors for each header pipe. The Tunnel Wedge was ahead by 30 HP and 11 Torque at 6400 RPM !

10
Tubes were clean and I always lube up the O rings been doing it for the 10 years I have had this setup but why not move up to something better? Can't figure why one decided to leak the next day? Who knows what the new O rings are made off and from where these days. I remember15 years ago I had a friend who was running a pair of 4160 carbs on his 70 Hemi Challenger and he always had some trouble with them and I think those were the "better" boot design. I never could get those to work well and went back to the old O ring.
Anyway I will be testing out my new setup on the bench and if the pipe plug stays leak free....good to go and NEVER worry again when doing jet changes!

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: melling lifters
« on: August 14, 2025, 07:53:21 AM »
Back in the 70's we would slide a new cam in and add a can of the GM Break-in oil additive and NEVER had a problem. Installed many cams back then of different makes and with my brother's 426 Hemi we installed the Racer Brown STX-22  Super/Stock cam and lifters using the race springs of that time....solid flat tappet and no issues at all ! Back then no mention for a light break-in springs and it all worked fine.  Must be that everyone wants crazy ramp velocity which requires much stiffer springs for that extra power?

12
 Anyone running the 4160 style carbs on the 2X4 intake convert the secondary bowl to a standard fuel inlet for a true dual feed.   I had a transfer tube O ring just suddenly give up causing a nice leak. Luckily this happened in my garage and not on the road!  Had done a jet change on Saturday and everything ran fine all day. Next morning try to go for a drive and O ring failed on startup.
First time that has happened in 10 years running my carbs and now I just don't trust the O rings!!  I have modified an extra bowl I have and it is simple enough to do. Set it up in my mill and machine off the spun over material. Take a center drill and when it gets a bite the steel plug with O ring spins right out. The inlet bore diameter is same as the primary bowl so I tapped it for 9/16-24 thread like the other for screw in Holley type hose barb. Now sealing up that transfer port you have some options. I am trying the tap it with 1/8-27 pipe/plug tap and will use brass Allen socket plug with generous amount of Permatex Aviation sealant.   
Any of you race guys do this mod? Will test one carb out and see if the plugs stay leak free.

13
FE Technical Forum / Re: Question for the Tunnel Wedge intake experts?
« on: August 04, 2025, 07:42:36 AM »
Before making changes to the intake, you need to know how much the heads flow, and how much the manifold runners flow.  If the manifold flows 110% or more of the head flow, then it is unnecessary to modify the intake for street usage.  Making the radius larger will only slow down the velocity in the runner because it shortens the runner's effective taper.  Joe-JDC

Thanks for the info on the top radius Joe!  After I posted this question I found some info that making it larger will slow the air speed in runner a bit. This intake is cast for the 351W 9.5 deck engines and I will run it on my tried and true 427W which has about same bore/ stroke as a 428. Heads are TFS 225 HP and flow 330/258 at .600 lift. Cam is a 241/249 .600 HR and has been running great for 15 years now. Valve springs by Pac replaced 6 years ago.

14
FE Technical Forum / Re: Question for the Tunnel Wedge intake experts?
« on: August 01, 2025, 01:00:11 PM »
Have to have a starting place and figured some here have been around the block once or twice with this type manifold.

15
FE Technical Forum / Question for the Tunnel Wedge intake experts?
« on: August 01, 2025, 11:38:49 AM »
Would it help flow into runner if this radius area is larger than  the 1/4 inch radius as cast?  Will be running a 1 inch 4 hole merge type spacer also.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 19