Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jason R

Pages: [1]
1
Paul, I see the same rocker and valve movement on my hydraulic lifter motors when setting the valve adjustment. Once you take the slack out of the pushrod. (mine are always sloppy loose with the correct pushrods and the adjuster backed out)  Then go the one turn and you will see the rocker and valve open a little because the lifter is full of oil. It takes a like 15 to 20 seconds for the lifter to bleed a little oil out as the spring pushes the valve back shut. It just closes slow so it's hard to see with the eye. If you put a dial indicator on the spring retainer you would see clearly it comes open .040-.050" quickly as you adjust then slowly creeps back to close as the lifter bleeds enough oil to accommodate the adjustment. If you work through Barry's procedure you'll be there assuming your pushrods are correct? But you've been running it this way so it seems this adjustment can only verify another problem exists or be an improvement.
Jason

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Head surfacing question
« on: August 05, 2016, 03:20:01 PM »
Thanks for the info and those pictures. I won't mess with my intake manifold till my block is ready and I can fit it up. I went ahead and cut the older head .015" more for a total of .030" and now both heads chamber CC's average around 69. The thumbnails mentioned look to be between those two pictured, approx .050" on the newer head and .025" on the older one. Now I'm wondering is there a set amount I need to cut the intake face of the older head just because I cut .030" off its deck surface?
Thanks again
Jason

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: Head surfacing question
« on: August 05, 2016, 12:03:29 PM »
More info I forgot to mention I have already cut about .015" of the estimated .030" to get to my 72 cc average on the older head. It's not consistent but I seem to get around 1cc for every .005 I cut off.
Thanks
Jason

4
FE Technical Forum / Head surfacing question
« on: August 05, 2016, 11:41:42 AM »
Hello guys, I'm looking for some help on figuring out proper milling of a set of heads. I have a pair of C6ae-R's that are date coded a year or so apart and of unknown history. The newer head 6C18 took a .005" surface cut to clean up and have an average chamber CC of 69. The older head 5L19 looks like it's going to need about .030" to .035" to get its average CC's to match (around 72 avg now). So once I cut this one that much what should I do to the intake face? Also should I expect any issues in intake port alignment or block fit that a basic port match at assembly won't fix? I don't have a block ready for them now to really check things out. Once again thanks in advance for all the great feedback and experience we get off this forum.

Jason

5
Thanks for the input guys I will give the TA-31 a shot
Jason

6
FE Technical Forum / How to seal up the rear of my intake manifold
« on: July 15, 2016, 02:31:51 AM »
Hey all, looking for some pointers or a better method to stop oil leaks at the back of my intake manifold. I just installed some ED heads and a home ported streetmaster. First time together had a little pushrod to intake contact so I pulled it apart again and put the die grinder to it for clearance. real noisy valve train on startup. 2nd time together fired up and sounded great but it started leaking at the drivers rear intake onto the exhaust and ruined the show. Currently I'm using the cork gaskets glued down with gasgacinch and ultra Grey on top of them. Struck out or did it wrong cause it's leaking now. So I'm pulling it apart again and thinking of ditching the cork and using just black aresol " right stuff" sealer at both ends and hoping for the best. What are you guys running to seal these things or what else might help. I also am running a  vacuum pump on the crankcase pulling about 13" at higher rpms.
Thanks
Jason

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: Tight intake valve clearance ?
« on: July 02, 2016, 10:35:38 AM »
Brent, Thanks for the reply. Yes it was a light checking spring and a solid roller lifter. Upon assembly the hydraulic lifters and standard valve springs will go back in. I have room to spare on the exhaust side especially since I advanced the cam.
Thanks again
Jason

8
FE Technical Forum / Tight intake valve clearance ?
« on: July 02, 2016, 07:49:34 AM »
Hello all, I'm in the process of installing edelbrock heads on my 64 galaxie and I'm running into tight intake valve clearance for the head gasket I want to run. Engine is a 416 with a comp hydraulic roller I've been running for a couple years with a set of c6ae-u heads and CJ valve sizes. With a new Ed head torqued down, checking springs and 1020 felpro gasket (.045"measured) and a SOLID roller lifter I get a minimum intake clearance .078" from 6-10 degrees ATDC. I would like to run cometic .030" gaskets with a 4.165" bore to bump the compression and keep a tight squish height (piston .012" in the hole at TDC). With the cometic I should drop to around .063" intake clearance minimum. So my question is if I go with the cometic .030" gasket and once I put the hydraulic lifters back in will I lose say .020" or so of lift and buy me just enough clearance on the intake to get by? I plan on mainly street driving, 6k max rpm, and occasional trip to the track. If your wondering  valve springs are 165lbs on the seat and around 425lbs on the nose at .600" lift. Also I started this problem for myself by advancing the cam 4degrees during this install, before with the cam straight up I was fine on valve clearance. I am prepared to drop the cam back 2 or 4 if needed, but I would sure like to try this combo before I do. Thanks in advance for any experiences or advice you guys can lend
Jason

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: Engine ID quandary
« on: November 21, 2015, 01:12:09 AM »
Hello Old Man 62, if you don't find what your looking for over in the LA basin and don't mind a trip to Riverside county message me I think I have some of the parts you need.
Jason

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: 390 build - failed cam bearings
« on: September 23, 2015, 11:13:31 PM »
Sorry guys I messed that up, I was looking at my block upside down!
    3 o'clock and 6 o'clock would be correct for the oil hole locations for the #1 cam bearing looking at the front of the block.
Jason

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: 390 build - failed cam bearings
« on: September 23, 2015, 10:58:10 PM »
Jakes66 after reading this I was looking close at my "105" block that I am just starting to put together, and it seems like an easy mistake to make. The ref book I am using is Steve Christ how to rebuild BBF only mentions lining the  oil hole in the bearing with the oil passages in the block. On the # 1 cam bearing that's easier because there's two holes in both the bearing and two in the block to match. But as you all know on #2-5 there's a hole at 12 o'clock from the galley and one at 6 o'clock headed to the mains with the channels all around those last four and only a single bearing hole. For me putting an FE together only occasionally this has left me a little confused before. It surprises me that the pressurized feed at 12 couldn't carry enough oil around to the loaded side at 6 to protect the cam and bearings for the short duration you ran it. I guess a new tight motor and those valve springs are still enough force to break through that oil film?
 On your #1 cam bearing was it in with holes at 12 o'clock and like 3 o'clock which would block any flow at all from getting to it or the distributor bushing or was it in correct with holes at 6 o'clock and 9 that gives it full flow. I ask because it's different than the others and if it was in correctly the #1 cam bearing should be good unless something else in the motor was wrong? I don't mean to be a PITA but this is one of those threads that's worth it's weight in gold for guys like me who can learn from someone's experiences.
Thanks,
Jason

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: CVR electric water pump setup question
« on: September 20, 2015, 10:44:58 PM »
Thanks for clarifying Jay. Looking at the old pump I wasn't sure which side the connection was on.
Jason

13
FE Technical Forum / CVR electric water pump setup question
« on: September 18, 2015, 12:02:42 AM »
Hello all, great forum I'm new here but I have been stalking it for a while. Anyways finally signed up and I was looking for some ideas on completing my CVR electric water pump install on my 64 Galaxie. I've got the pump installed with FE power adapter brackets (power steer and alt. version). I need to connect my heater core return (I believe) and there is no provision on the CVR pump for it. Is this hose supposed to go to the pump suction side? Anybody running this and using their heater still, how are you tapping in? There are two ports in the pump for the inlet connection from the radiator below one plugged and one to the radiator hose. Can I go in to one of those if I tap the plug connection somehow. Or should I try to tee into the lower hose? Thanks in advance for any help.

Jason

Pages: [1]