Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - woodboatwayne

Pages: [1]
1
FE Technical Forum / Re: Oil
« on: August 31, 2015, 05:24:40 PM »
That's a great point. 

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Oil
« on: August 31, 2015, 06:25:59 AM »
Found a consumer reports test that used metropolitan cabs for 2 years and 60,000 miles. They found that no measureable difference in wear based on any major brand of oil exist. This was the only oil test I could find surfing for 20 minutes not sponsored by an oil company.

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: Oil
« on: August 30, 2015, 05:22:51 PM »
Autoholic. Went back and read the tests you quoted. Very interesting. I liked the first test better. I used Royal Purple dino oil years ago when I could find it. After going back to Nightrider I see that the do have an interesting oil article, but no link to others anymore.

4
FE Technical Forum / Re: Oil
« on: August 30, 2015, 04:42:52 PM »
The tests I remember put a lot of emphasis on breakdown due to heat and used a test involving either 3 or 5 steel balls. I believe they had the balls in a tube and rolled them for and extended period of time and either measured the oil retention, heat or perhaps the metal
particles in the oil. The first test with new oil had all brands closely grouped, but subsequent test with used oil exposed to high heat (as
in air cooled motorcycle) showed Mobil 1 with a clear advantage. I wished I had saved the articles in favorites but didn't. I think I surfed onto the site from "Nightrider" a Harley semi technical site. After posting this I am going to try to find it. Net result was that I changed oil pump and chain tensioners on an older twin cam Harley to a later style and started using Mobil 1 excluseively. Both the test and the method were interesting

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: Oil
« on: August 25, 2015, 08:49:44 PM »
I got real interested in oils several years ago and read every test on line. Mobil 1 was first in every independent test. In the sponsored test it was 2nd behind whoever sponsored the test. I was especially interested in how heat affected the various brands. I use the appropriate weight Mobil 1 in everything I own including my 390 and 292 Y block

6
FE Technical Forum / Re: 390 horsepower
« on: August 25, 2015, 08:35:56 PM »
compare your compression ratio and cam to ones listed on a "Ford FE specs" site on line will get you pretty close

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: allumiumn intake
« on: July 29, 2015, 07:52:12 PM »
The fact that it is aluminum won't make a difference, but all of the aftermarket (performance) manifolds are aluminum.
The manifold should complement the heads and cam, and carb. A replacement aluminum dual plane 4 barrel manifold compared to a stock iron 2 barrel on a stock or mild engine would make a significant difference from just off idle to redline. A large runner single plane
would hurt. I recommend David Vizzard's book "carbururetors and intake manifolds" from the how to build horsepower series

8
FE Technical Forum / Re: harmonic balancers
« on: July 22, 2015, 08:31:17 PM »
How would a fluid damper figure into this debate? Built 2 small BBC's before I got the FE bug and used fluid dampers on them and was pleased, but really didn't have a reference point.

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: 390 Block Question
« on: July 19, 2015, 09:45:05 PM »
if you only need a block don't overlook the 360, it is exactly the same

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: intake dynamics
« on: July 02, 2015, 09:16:33 PM »
thanks Joe, that's exactly what I was hoping to hear

11
FE Technical Forum / intake dynamics
« on: July 02, 2015, 06:07:40 PM »
Was wondering if someone with more experience than me might be able to shed some light on an intake question. I have a mild
390 with an edelbrock performer plus cam. I want to run a quadrajet carb because of the tiny primaries hoping that because they
are so small the signal will be strong enough to atomize the fuel enough to overcome the larger runners and plenum of a streetmaster
single plane intake. I don't plan to run a spacer so not to increase the plenum size. I have a t85 with OD trans so I am concerned with
engine speeds of 2 to 2.5 grand, and also 3.5 to redline when my foot is in it. It is in a 3600lb ranchwagon. Rear gear will be 3.7 or so
when I change it. I own the streetmaster.

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: Daily driver
« on: June 30, 2015, 07:15:07 PM »
I am building a daily driver with a 390, performer plus cam which reads like an RV grind. Will be put in front of a t85 overdrive in my 56 ranchwagon. I am tentatively planning to use a quadrajet because of the tiny primaries. I got some gasket matched cast iron heads
and a streetmaster intake also gasket matched in a trade. Maybe someone can tell me if the streetmaster intake can work under 2500rpm because of the strong signal to the quadrajet primaries? FE dual planes seem expensive and I already have the streetmaster.

Pages: [1]