1
Private Classifieds / Re: The Grim Reaper Is Chasing Me, My 463 Can Out Run Him, But ...
« on: March 20, 2025, 09:02:35 PM »Why not just state the asking price, so people don't have to guess?
It went to a good home!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Why not just state the asking price, so people don't have to guess?
I saw you on the '62 Galaxie FB page, wondered what the heck you were up to. Makes sense.
I like the tri-power idea. I looked around for a long time for a 3x2 tunnel wedge intake for my '62 because I thought running tri-power on a '62 is cooler than a 2x4.
Very cool project. I hope to see it run eventually.
I want to know more about the car! '62 Galaxie, Pro touring, 600+ inch SOHC, twin turbo's?
Why would deleting the sub-routine(s) to machine the cam tunnel incur "10's of thousands" of additional CAD costs?
The gear drive could be reconfigured to not need the stub shaft.
He wants to mount a DCT trans; I'd be interested in mounting an electric booster motor on the back. How are electric motors factored in as power boosters? Anyway, he leads with "billet" and "We can do anything from raised cam...", but then backs it way down to: we can do optional trans mounts...
How is the OHC valvetrain affected by the wider bore spacing he suggests is also possible?
For someone marketing to the 2500HP/Cost-is-no-object microniche you seem to be pinching pennies. Is this one of those deals where you guarantee Bailey's 10 blocks ordered in order to get your 1 block with the DCT trans mount? What if I wanted to run coil packs, a multi-stage drysump system, and adapt the cam drive from a modern Hurricane SOHC? Wouldn't need a stub shaft at all. Or maybe go totally oldschool, just a frontend plate to mount the geardrive for the cams.
And how flexible is the machining options, sounds like "not very". What if I wanted the heads' exhaust ports to feed into the valley area to make packaging turbos easier?
Of course, how exactly is this an FE anymore?
What if you designed your own instead of complaining about everything you don't like about his project? And by the way, the "old school" gear drive still used a stub shaft to drive the upper gears.
Dan, I think it sounds like a really interesting project, and I hope you keep us posted on your progress.
For someone marketing to the 2500HP/Cost-is-no-object microniche you seem to be pinching pennies. Is this one of those deals where you guarantee Bailey's 10 blocks ordered in order to get your 1 block with the DCT trans mount? What if I wanted to run coil packs, a multi-stage drysump system, and adapt the cam drive from a modern Hurricane SOHC? Wouldn't need a stub shaft at all. Or maybe go totally oldschool, just a frontend plate to mount the geardrive for the cams.
And how flexible is the machining options, sounds like "not very". What if I wanted the heads' exhaust ports to feed into the valley area to make packaging turbos easier?
Of course, how exactly is this an FE anymore?
I still don't understand how removing a large amount of block material, in the very center of the block, makes it stronger.
In this day and age of CNC machining, just how hard would it be to simply skip the cam tunnel entirely, leaving billet material filling the space?
You say you're doing this in order to mount a modern DCT without adapters? That's just a CNC program change, because you want to leave the option available for other customers to opt for a standard trans mount. So why not have a 'cam-tunnel-delete option?
Seriously, how does a cam tunnel strengthen a block?
Not sure I understand what the benefit of a raised cam tunnel might be in an OHC engine. Is it just more clearance for large stroke cranks? Would eliminating the cam tunnel entirely result in a stronger block?
I'm guessing they'll retain the cam bore just so it can be used in non-cammer engines also. No sense in limiting your customer base. Any time you remove mass, you're going to remove strength, so I would think removing the cam bore entirely would make the block weaker. By how much would probably depend on the design of the rest of the block. Since it's billet, it could easily be designed around to retain the strength, and probably make it even stronger by adding material to the center area where the bores would typically be, which supports the crank bulkheads.
Not sure I understand what the benefit of a raised cam tunnel might be in an OHC engine. Is it just more clearance for large stroke cranks? Would eliminating the cam tunnel entirely result in a stronger block?
and then there's this:QuoteBlock will be 13500
heads will be 12500
intake will be 10000
timing cover 2500
valve covers 2000
carbon valve covers 2000
So roughly about 40k for the hard parts.
I'm gonna go way out on a limb here and say that customers will probably be limited.
I'm also not aware of any "world records" in Drag Week, unless he's referring to Bailey's 5.99 run, which I think may be the fastest run for a "street legal" car? He also has a billet block.