Hi
I have a set of those rockers, and I posted a picture of them mounted on my  Pro Ports, and Blair Patrick responded that those rockers are short on ratio, I asked how much and the best he could remember was around 1.6". He said the lost of lift wasn't as bad as the lost of valve speed, due to less ratio.

Here's a post about the rockers: https://www.fordfe.com/viewtopic.php?p=1112033#p1112033

The Brad Penn oils, such as the 10w-30, 20w-50 and even their SAE 70w and their other oils still have levels of the minerals such as phosprous & zinc, just not at the level of thier 30w break-oil. And their multi grade oils are a Semi-Synthetic Blend.

The full synthetic blend oils are thin and tend to have leak issues, from what I've seen. I, am happy with the Brad Penn oils. My water cooled motors I run their 20w-50 Semi-Synthetic Blend, and my air cooled motors I run their SAE 50w here in So California.

I, got my heads back after reworking the exh. Originally I went with th SE exh port on the Tunnel Ports with the 1.675" valve, same as the FE Power Cylinder heads with the SE exh port with te 1.675" valve which were flowing around 260 cfm @ .800" lift with no porting.

The problem, the SE exh ports with the 1.675" valve on the TP heads didn't flow the same numbers as the FE Power Cylinder Heads with the SE exh port and the 1.675" valve. The chambers on the TP heads were stock, and so were not designed like the FE Power Cylinder Heads, which had modified chamber locations, relocated valve locations with shorter & longer port lengths.

I, was concerned with the exh, so I had them ported, so the SE port with the 1.675" valve and ported,  didn't flow worth a crap.
I, had shrouding issues, I wanted a 4.250" bore chamber hence the shrouding issue. Ended up opening the Chamber to a 4.300" Bore to help relieve the shrouding issue a little.

Next, it was recommended to increase valve size to 1.750", to open the throat of the valve seat for better flow. It was also recommended to run a Tulip valve instead of the nail head design I was using. I believe the Tulip was a 25 degree angle, and the weight  from the 1.675" valve to the 1.735" Tulip went from 106g to 118g. As you can see the 1.750" valve is now 1.735" and that was due to flow testing, which determined that the Valve Margins need to be increased to help flow, I measured the magin and it's at about .090", I don't know what it was before the valve was cut down from 1.750" to 1.735".

Flow 1 is with the port work and  the 1.750" valves installed.
Flow 2  is with the valve margin increse 4.300" chamber bore
and chamber work around the exh valve, which picked up
mid range


TP Exh Flow Numbers
Lift.......Flow1.....Flow2
0.100......55..........58
0.200....107........119
0.300....157........181
0.400....189........208
0.500....210........229
0.600....230........240
0.700....242........244
0.800....247........247
                                               
The chamber bore increase to 4.300" may have help to relieve
the Int shrouding slightly and help with flow
   
My TP Heads Int Flow Numbers
.400     258.16 
.500     308.48     
.600     356.53   
.700     390.40
.800     411.79
.900     425.16
     

20 Sets left.

The gaskets I ordered showed.

The initial sample I received, I didn't like the material: NV-565, I didn't like it's feel, it was a crappy lower grade material, I ended up going with a higher grade material, CMP-4000, which should allow re-use several times easily.

NV-565:


The Upgraded CMP-4000:



 

I got my Heads and Manifold back today.

Here are the flow Numbers for the Head's Intk's. Actually, their still a work in progress. Currently the Chamber Bore's are @ 4.250" and are shrouding both the Int's & Exh, so the Chambers will be open up to a 4.310" Bore. I, didn't really want to go that large a bore, but because of the Int size, I have no choice. But then, unshrouding the valves will pick up the flow slightly.

The 1.675" exh valve is too small, I'll be going to a 1.800" valve and opening up the seat to match where the issue lies, it was also recommended to go to Tulip valves to assist flow, but I don't like their extra weight. 



                                                               These specs from bowl cleanup & valve job 
                                                                                 


My TP Heads Int Flow Numbers
.400     258.16 
.500     308.48     
.600     356.53   
.700     390.40
.800     411.79
.900     425.16

 First prototype tunnel port head Ported by Joe Craine
Lift            Intake       Exhaust (no pipe)
.100"          78             58
.200"         155          114
.300"         227          141
.400"         285          192
.500"         330          212
.600"         357          219
.700"         379          222
.800"         390          230  (260 with pipe)

 







Here's a picture of the Epoxied & Ported Int, which had an Averaged flow of 460CFM





The Exh:

Heads so far.

2.300" Int's
1.675" Exh's



As is, the SE Exh ports flow 240 cfm @ .600" lift.



As is, the stock Int Ports flow 339 cfm @ .600" lift

When we do “ported” factory TP heads, we always fill the floors and I just use a standard Mr Gasket TP intake gasket.

I, thought I would step up and have some ran, since there are none available anywhere. I, bought a set about 6 months ago, Mr. Gasket 205G, a couple months back I was going to pick up a spare set, just to have on hand, but they were no where to be found, so I looked into having some ran, and thought why not fill the gasket in for the raised port.