Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jwhitton

Pages: [1]
1
Member Projects / Re: FE Intake Adapter
« on: August 18, 2013, 09:06:05 PM »
Thanks for the video Jay. I'm now confident that with my rocker setp and restrictors in place, no provisions are necessary for additional oil return.
Since I have the heads off, I'll likely just clean up the factory returns for insurance.

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Clear vlalve covers and Victor intake?
« on: August 17, 2013, 08:34:29 PM »
Thanks Jay. Ironically, I'm currently changing the cam along with this intake change. Specs are similar to a 294S with a bit more lift and tighter LSA.

I look forward to your next round of flogging of the pump.


3
Member Projects / Re: The fairlane stood proud tonight !
« on: August 17, 2013, 09:06:31 AM »
Make sure you wash the right side real well. It looks like you may have parked a bit close to that Chev...

Nice!


4
FE Technical Forum / Clear vlalve covers and Victor intake?
« on: August 17, 2013, 06:55:30 AM »
Jay,
I'm trying to determine how much oil will pool up in my heads when using a Victor. I'm running the full pumpbuilder rockers with solid spacers and 2007 vintage Edelbrock heads.

I think the returns in the heads are sufficient, but I was wondering if you have run anything similar with your clear covers?

For those not familiar with the Victor intake, it has no passages for oilr return between the ports at the head interface.

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: Pics of lifters after "break-in"
« on: June 23, 2013, 06:53:30 PM »
Yes, the previous break-in failure was on the break-in machine. At least that's what they told me. I question if it ever really happened or if that was a convenient excuse when I called asking where my cam was 2 weeks after it should have arrived.
When I asked what he thought happened, he didn't know. He said "sometimes it just happens, better on my machine than in your engine". Although that's true, the engineer in me says this should never happen. There are very few unknowns in the tribology of materials.

6
FE Technical Forum / Re: Pics of lifters after "break-in"
« on: June 23, 2013, 10:22:35 AM »
Cam lobes all look good. Each looks the same as the next.

7
FE Technical Forum / Pics of lifters after "break-in"
« on: June 23, 2013, 07:13:46 AM »
Purchased a cam, solid lifters and springs from CamResearch broken in on their machine. Had to wait a while for them to run and ship a 2nd set because the first one wiped a lobe. Well, I'm not sure I like some of the things I see on the surface of these lifters, but have never seen a set at this point of their life. I do know that I'm not comfortable with the nicks seen on almost every lifter. Some are very deep. Doesn't appear to be induced by the break-in process, but an overall quality concern. Some also have circular rings that others don't. In my opinion, they should all look one way or another, not different.

To be clear, I'm assuming the off-center grind marks were there to begin with, to promote rotation? The rings I'm talking about are concentric to the center of the face.

Looking for any input here.

Pics aren't great as they were taken with my phone. Dark color in some areas is an artifact of the lighting, all lifters are actually the same singular color.

http://s238.photobucket.com/user/cyclonic66/library/CamResearch%20solid%20lifter%20break-in?sort=3&src=wap&page=1


8
Member Projects / Re: FE Intake Adapter
« on: June 02, 2013, 06:15:08 AM »
I don't think you could find a source for vacuum heat treating that could come close to $7 per manifold. I'm guessing 5x to 10x that number, depending on the size of the furnace, the age of the capital involved and the industry the source is in. That heat treat is common in my business (aerospace), but those guys get real comfortable charging aero dollars.

I think your current path is the most cost effective.


9
Member Projects / Re: FE Intake Adapter
« on: June 01, 2013, 08:13:25 PM »
Jay, I suspect your heat treater is using a 2 stage heat treat in air and a liquid quench at the end of the solution heat treat? That's the dirty option.
You could source a vacuum heat treat utilizing a helium quench. This would eliminate the post processing required for the look. Parts would come out of the furnace looking bright virgin silver. Cost will be higher, but that depends on the cost of blasting. A single furnace would do both heat treatments (solution and precip) required for T6 in a single run as well. For cost purposes, you would likely need a high number of parts to maximize the load.
Not sure what options you have where you are or near your foundry.

Pages: [1]