Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hercamer

Pages: [1]
1
Member Projects / Re: FE Intake Adapter
« on: February 07, 2013, 08:16:55 PM »
Chevy is sooo stupid they even build their blocks backwards ;D..good catch Royce, and Jay...

well it was worth a thought, it's all in the details as they say.


Kent

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Oil additive
« on: February 07, 2013, 04:38:28 PM »

On break in I have always used GM EOS along with brad Penn oil, after break in I run straight Brad Penn and have zero cam failures in all the years using it.

My Cam guy has recommended Brad Penn for many years and I trust his experience, he's been in the cam regrinding business more than 30+ years.


web page for brad Penn: http://www.penngrade1.com/


Kent


3
Member Projects / Re: FE Intake Adapter
« on: February 07, 2013, 04:28:11 PM »
As has been said before...

Let me be clear. :)

I love the 351 Cleveland and have one in a 70 maverick bracket car. I would never run an LS engine in anything I own. >:(

 I am all Fords and will always be.

But as far as intake options go..no comparison,

LS...(Edelbrock, PerformerRPM, Victor Jr. , Victor, Pro-flo EFI), (Holley, single 4, dual four and hi ram fuel injection),(Mast, EFI in many configurations including tunnelram),(FAST LSXR ram type manifolds)..plus many other mfg... blower intakes, etc. etc...

Generally because of the stinking bowtie less money..and like the cleveland no water in he manifold.

Not trying to change anyones mind here just looking at options, and asking questions that potentially could save money and development time for Jay.

As said before, Love the idea and appreciate the hel out of Jay doing it, can't wait for the result no matter what intake it uses, 351C or Jay's own designs, I will own a couple and put them to use.

Thanks, Kent


4
Member Projects / Re: FE Intake Adapter
« on: February 06, 2013, 11:34:52 PM »
Real cool, cannot wait for the production pieces to be available.

Was wondering if a design incorporating a manifold supply that will probably diminish due to popularity fading(the 351C), vs. maybe making the adapter mate to a more likely long term candidate (say gulp :o, the LS from the bowtie boys) would be a better choice. Just a thought, either way I will own a couple.

Thanks Jay for all your efforts on this.

Hercamer


Pages: [1]