1
FE Technical Forum / Re: 427 cast iron headers99
« on: December 20, 2015, 01:24:28 PM »
At least 50hp
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Really if you wanted the ultimate ignition system you would go coil on plug with a custom box. I have made custom circuit board systems for other applications before but not for that. I would use the Caddy variable timing circuit as a basis for my build. And use a standard ECM for controlled access.
MSD Digital 7s can do individual cylinder timing adjustments, based on a reference from cylinder #1. You have to put one of their spark pulse sensors, which is essentially the same as the clip from a timing light, over the #1 spark plug wire. The sensor is actually a donut shape, so it doesn't clip on to the plug wire, you have to pull one boot off the #1 plug wire and thread the wire through the sensor. Then there is a cable, fiberoptic I think, which goes from the sensor to a port in the MSD Digital 7. You have to tell the MSD what your firing order is, and then the software in the MSD will allow you to retard timing in any of the cylinders. I used this setup on my Mach 1 when I was running the supercharged engine, which was carbureted.
I think there are a lot of factors at work when it comes to causing variations in the individual cylinder fuel or timing requirements. Variations in the intake manifold and headers comes to mind, as well as fuel distribution. By the way, fuel distribution issues are not automatically cured by 8 EFI injectors, because there can be significant variation in the injectors themselves. Also temperature differences from cylinder to cylinder caused by variations in the cooling system could come into play, small variations in pistons or combustion chambers from cylinder to cylinder, etc. etc.; the list goes on and on. My efi-guru friend Dieselgeek has seen remarkably large variations from cylinder to cylinder in fuel requirements even with individual runner sheet metal intakes and EFI setups. So the more tunability you can put into individual cylinders, the more likely you will be able to squeeze out more horsepower.
Back in the day when I had my 69 Mustang E/SA 428 car we played with the boosters in the carb using some of the special version Ford had produced for various applications in order to improve mixture distribution. These boosters had small tabs cast onto the od of the booster at the bottom of the venturi. Maybe someone here has pictures of some of these. Of course we also played with the air bleeds along with the PVCR channels to adjust for cylinder to cylinder variation as indicated by plug reading. Indexing the plugs is really important in my view to make those samll adjustments more visible and repeatable.
Having eight AFR bungs in the headers as Jay mentioned really can help with that kind of tuning now that we have the technology available so relatiively inexpensively.
I'm way out of touch with what is legal in Stock eliminator classes these days. Can you run an ignition that allows you you tailor individual cylinder timing curves/ Maps? The dyno is best for that as it'll take a ton of drag strip passes to accomplish what you can in one or two days of dyno flogging.
All of this assumes you are trying to set record's or qualify at the top of the list. Otherwise getting the car to be consistent and working on your driving is way more important for going rounds.
One other note you will never be able to get a car to run as fast at 3000 DA as it does at sea level if the sea level tune was optimal or close to it, but neither can anyone else.
Ok if my math is right. There is 1,728 cubic inches in one cubic foot. 1728x640=1,105,920 Cubic inches of total volume. 1,105,920 / 427 = 2,589.97 x 4 = 10,359.90 RPM's???
Pretty close, Kris, but I'm not sure where you got the additional multiplication factor of 4 in your answer. The way I think of this is that it takes two revolutions of a four stroke engine to take in it's complete displacement. So, for a 427" engine, for one complete revolution it will take in 427/2 cubic inches of air, or 213.5 cubic inches. Using the numbers you calculated, 1,105,920 / 213.5 = 5180 RPM.
??