Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TimeWarpF100

Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 46
556
FE Technical Forum / Re: weight of a 428 f e
« on: September 15, 2014, 10:19:22 PM »

Yeah i think a stock fully dressed 352 is a hair over 700lbs  so there is a lot of savings to be had there.

FE is not that heavy. Closer to 620lbs.  You are closer to weight of a 385 series engine.

557
sorry. Missed reply

150.00

558
Member Projects / Re: My 427 SOHC Build..... Finally the time has come!
« on: September 12, 2014, 09:14:37 PM »
Really watching this one!

Exciting build for sure

559
Member Projects / Re: '76 F100 Build
« on: September 10, 2014, 08:12:05 PM »
I'm not so hard over against POR15, it does have its place in some situations and can be cost-effective.  I used it with good results on those portions of the Cyclone floor that were scaly but salvageable, after proper surface prep it worked a treat and then I covered it with sound deadener (see pic).

That said, I'm with TimeWarpF100's advice on finishing a sandblasted frame, don't go the POR15 route.  The lesson I've taken away is that POR is best used in places where you don't plan to have anyone see it.  The application instructions MUST be adhered to the letter or it will just peel off and/or yield a peculiar surface finish when dry that looks like crap and is impossible to cover up with anything else.  And it's a bugger to clean up.

There are no shortcuts or, at least in my limited experience, none that won't be regretted later. 

http://s458.photobucket.com/user/mlcraven/media/1967%20Cyclone%20Resto/Int7-2013SoundDeadener2_zps6f5b4443.jpg.html

poor15 does have its place,. Just not in my shop . . . LOL

For someone who has minimal $$ to cover up rust more power to them. Its just that for me I can blast it and do a much better job in the fraction of time and elbow grease.
I simply do not care for the look of it.

Again, here in AZ we have little rust to deal with.

Love that Cyclone!  Some day I would like another 66 or 67.  I do prefer the 66 as I like the grille better and then no emissions to worry about like the '67 here still has.

560
Wondering why there was such a large diff in pricing I called each one back. Gave same specifics

Even though I asked for Chromoly to each vendor the only one who gave pricing for Chromoly was MW. The reason they were higher cost.

Turns out the others gave pricing for a replacement mild steel shaft.

So back to the drawing board to which one I chose.

A few years back when I was going to order the place said since I was planning on going to a 1350 yoke they would ship me that so I could get exact measurments.

Of course the yoke is now a 145.00 item and I cannot find it! Go figure . . .

About the time I thought I had a decision made its time to start all over .

I had planned on going with the 3" Chromoly but now not sure.


561
Member Projects / Re: '76 F100 Build
« on: September 10, 2014, 01:29:15 PM »
People use the POR15 to go direct over rust. The "cheap" route to just cover over the slop.

Since you seem to be doing it correct by blasting first it will not cost much more to have it powdercoated.

I paid 200.00 to have my frame powdercoated and could not be happier with the result. Most areas it may cost more but well worth it.

To me the POR15 is used for one reason. Trying to cut a corner and do it on the cheap.

If you are going to spray vs brush, roll its different but it will simply not look as nice when done.

I tried POR15 once for just that. Taking a short cut and never again. Maybe for covering mud puddles or  . . .

If I was doing a chassis and POR came and said here is free materials and 1000.00 in cash I still would not use it!

Just look up photo's for end result using "poor15" then make your own decision

562
Member Projects / Re: My FE Powered 1966 F100 "Project"
« on: September 10, 2014, 01:18:21 PM »
Another week goes by and very little progress has been made on the header build.

Getting too old for this anymore, having great difficulty getting under truck then back up again.

At this rate its going to be a while before I will be able to finish them up.

Still hoping I will be able some how some way to finish them. Other wise may just as well dig a ditch and bury the entire truck . . LOL!

(I can at least rent a backhoe for that)

563

At Drag Week in 2007 I blew up a supercharger on the drive down to the event, and then after replacing that broke the transmission at the test and tune, and Joel and I stayed up all night pulling the transmission, having a local trans guy fix it, and re-installing it so we could race the next day. But at 56 years old, those days are behind me; I wasn't up for a massive thrash that may or may not fix the car.   After all the work I'd put into this car over the last few months, I had already decided that if I developed a major problem at Drag Week I wasn't going to bust my hump to get it fixed.  And this was obviously a major problem. 


Sorry to hear Jay. I was really looking forward to reports for DW.

I hear what you are saying about being 56 yrs old. I will be 58 in a few months and I thought building headers for my truck was going to be a breeze. Its taking forever because once I get under it I have a difficult time getting back up.

Hope the report on engine is not a big $$ failure.

564
DynoTech returned call

These are all for Chromoly shafts

DynoTech                                400.00  They said a 3.5" shaft vs 3.0" of the 3 others

Inland Empire                           324.00 vs 415.00 For 3.5" ALum

Mark Williams                           429.00 vs 559.00 for 3.5" Alum

Strange                                    319.00  they do not do Alum

Thanks to all who gave input!

I just need to figure out which place to go with and get it ordered.

565
NOS still in the package chrome front bumper. C4TZ part number

This does fit the 64-66 Trucks but it does not have the bevel on end like a original truck would. I bought it NOS to fit my 427 truck years ago. It was in wrapper and a large wooden crate. I simply never looked at it and took the guys word it was the 64-66 style. When I opened it recently found its more the 67-72 Style.  I paid 500.00 because so hard to find. Will take 350.00 OBO

A lot of truck guys here restoring so thought I would try here first . . .

Super hard to find a 3/8 fuel sender for a 66-67 427 Comet~Fairlane.
This was off my '67 427 Comet. I have given up on idea I would buy it back some day.

I also have the rear tailpipe hangars from same car

A long time ago a forum member was looking for a nice windshield washer bottle and bracket for a 1966 Comet. When I went to send it I could not find it. Well I found it the other day . . So to that person or someone else looking. Looks like new . .

Need funds to finish my 427 Truck project. Keep watching as will be adding parts here vs starting another post . .

566
weight

Some may have a preference for "looks"  Kinda like I do

A lot of OEM stuff is going aluminum

567
DynoTech was closed when I called or at least no answer.

So far:

Inland Empire is 324.00 for a 3" Steel & 415.00 for a 3.5 ALum

That is using my 1350 trans yoke

MW quoted  429.00 for the 3" chromoly & 559.00 for the 3.5" Aluminum

Both for estimated length of 49"

When I started this build I re-used my stock 28 spline axles and yoke in the 9"
I did add a Yukon posi

So looks like the next week link will be the center section.

MW quoted me 606.00 for a pair of axles and 1890.00 for a "N" case unit complete.
I flat out do not have the $$ for either.

Once I am doing the driveshaft I have to make sure it will hold the power and then plan on doing center once I see how many hidden $$ are required to get truck on road. At least I can drive it with current axle if I take it easy..

I have another '66 F100 416 FE project waiting (back burner) I can use the current center and axles for.

Looks like its time I start to unload some not needed parts . . .

Edit add:

Spoke with Strange

They quoted 319.00 for a Chromoly 3"  They do not do Aluminum shafts

They did say the 3" shaft they do there are people running 2000 HP with that shaft

So far all 3 places have been very helpful. I would give them all a A+

I will call DynoTech in morning or wait for a return call before I bite the bullet and order one.

Wait times have been from 48hrs to a week & 1/2

568
On the aluminum shafts, how much hp is supported? It appears there are 3",3.5" and 4" in diameter. I wonder at what point a 4130 steel shaft becomes necessary.

I have made some calls to different places suggested.

I was told at my HP level a 3" chromemoly would be fine

If I went to a aluminum it would need to be a 3.5". the weight savings to 3.5 Alum from 3" steel would be approx 20%

I did not ask at what level the Steel would need to be used. By the sounds of it the larger aluminum will hold a lot of HP. Way over and above of what my 482 will produce.

I was also told I should step up to a 1350 pinion yoke.

569
Thanks to all for reply's so far.

I am in Phoenix AZ Metro area, far north side

570
Member Projects / Re: '76 F100 Build
« on: September 07, 2014, 01:01:56 AM »
:(
D'oh!!  Just hit a snag - the fairly new compressor we were using to sandblast the frame just up and quit..  >:( 
That puts a crimp in our plans to have it done/POR15'd by the end of the week.  We were hoping to have it to the paint shop by the end of next week, so we'll have to wait and see.

As long as you are going through all the trouble to sandblast the frame nice I would do anything but POR15.

Powdercoat done right would be best. Then a good bonding primer for bare metal like DP90 (black) then a good paint like PPG DCC Concept 9000. If you want it satin~semi gloss just add a bit of flattening agent.

Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 46