Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mark Bliss

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
46
FE Technical Forum / Re: 1975 Ford F-500 Custom Cab 4-Speed Delivery Truck
« on: September 26, 2023, 06:08:26 PM »
I'd split the deal with anyone who wanted anything left over...
I want the cab, fenders, hood, grill and front bumper. In other words, just the cab body. No frame, no drivetrain, no bed...

What I would fashion out of it would offend every breathing restoration fan.

Which is all to say, in my little twisted corner of the world....
That thing is cool.


47
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« on: September 23, 2023, 06:51:40 PM »
👍

48
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: M/T drag radial age question
« on: September 23, 2023, 03:08:28 PM »
Hi Alan,

I don't have experience with the M/T DOT radials specifically, so this is just a general opinion.

The RMA (Rubber manufacturers association) recommends 6 years on passenger car tires. This has always seemed a little aggressive IMO, and besides- they represent companies who sell tires. However, I have become more cautious and start thinking about 8-10 years certainly.

It has also been my observation that generally, race compounds deteriorate somewhat faster. I think UV/Ozone exposure is partly to blame, so storing them inside may have reduced that effect.

I think it's a good question, but in the end... Making a 100 MPH+ pass in a valuable vintage car... It's your call, but honestly, I would be having negative thoughts if it were me.

BTW I have a pair of BFG Drag Radials over 20 years old. I wouldn't do more than idle around the block on them to blow the cobwebs out. If that.  ;)







49
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« on: September 23, 2023, 02:55:07 PM »
That build boggles my mind. Huge accomplishment of the near impossible.
That crank riding on three mains making that power... Wow! But it isnt that far astray from some of the extreme outer limit FE builds I have seen.

Amazing...that someone would spend huge money, time and effort for a one-off engine redesign only to cage a trophy (no $) and bragging rights! Geez, a turbo on any modern engine would surpass this old flathead design for sure.

I think the point is that he wants the Flathead record, not just any speed record.
If that thing stays together, he may own the record for all time.

50
FE Technical Forum / Re: Intake question
« on: September 23, 2023, 02:47:05 PM »
I admit to regret for milling a rare vintage manifold to fit with milled heads, when I should have milled the intake face on the heads.
But like many, I was young and knew everything.

Now I am older and know far less... But it is frustrating trying to pry experienced knowledge out of people sometimes.

51
FE Technical Forum / Re: FE Power Tunnel Port Cylinder Heads
« on: September 15, 2023, 07:37:13 PM »
That is a pleasant surprise Jay! And judging by the images there is a good bit of improvement available with a little "light massaging." Maybe an easy 15-20 CFM at least on the intake pocket area with no harm, maybe even improvement to velocity.

In the chamber, just by visual judgement, I might suggest considering laying back/smoothing the spark plug opening area mildly.
It just looks shrouded with a little too much room for "spooks and ninny's" to hide.
Not much, just a little "opening and smoothing" of the area.

Just a casual layman's observational view....
I am no engineer; I just play one on TV.

52
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: September 05, 2023, 06:06:37 PM »
Thanks Gerry.
I've heard the "six sizes" rule of thumb before. Probably a good starting point.
Not sure, might leave it in.

I always thought of the power valve in the secondary of a vac. sec. Holley a little differently than has been described, but am open to the idea of re-thinking it. Especially from folks who have possibly experimented and tested far more than I.

Entertaining theory only perhaps...
But if you were rolling along at a steady throttle state, say 3/4 for example. And the venturi vacuum combined with the secondary diaphragm spring were enough to allow the secondary to be open to some degree, it could be running on the primary and secondary main jet circuits but have enough vacuum signal for the power valves to be closed. Roll in more throttle opening, thus a vacuum drop and the power valves may open and provide enrichment on demand.

This built on a foundational ideology that a mechanical secondary attached to my foot may often result at times in a throttle opening that is a mismatch for engine demand, while a properly setup vacuum secondary operates more on engine demand.
This also combines with the recognition that for example- an engine dyno load doesn't necessarily accurately represent the loads and demands of real-world application.

Now i have to go back and evaluate- Is the power valve signal tapped form the same location for both pairs of venturi?

Forgive me, I have been living in a ECU controlled EFI world for too long now... This may be little more than throw-back cranial exercises.

53
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: September 05, 2023, 01:17:25 PM »
Fair enough, but if the sec. power valve is blocked, how much compensation in jetting is suggested? (Roughly)

Also, what's the consensus on secondary main jet extensions?
I always thought it might be a good idea on a hard accelerating car, but then there's a lot of "stuff" in marketing "upgrades" as always.

54
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: September 02, 2023, 08:06:23 AM »
Thanks again Drew, for confirming my suspicions. Seems like the best route.

And like I wrote folks, the question was intended more as a conversation starter, to encourage the sharing of experience.
I wasn't really seeking or expecting specific instruction.

Maybe I should have asked "What's the best way to get rid of the smell of stale gas and musty old car"
Or posted a YouTube video titled "Barn Find! First wash in over 20 years! Will it run?" 😁

55
FE Technical Forum / Re: hyd flat tappet cam
« on: August 31, 2023, 05:49:08 PM »
OP-
Was the camshaft shipped Fed-Ex at any point?

Based on my experiences, that would explain it...

But yeah, more info needed.

56
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: August 31, 2023, 12:34:43 PM »
Thank you Drew,

But my question wasn't about why there is a spread between pri/sec, but as to any ideas why this one might be jetted so far from original calibration.
But its only 4 sizes in reality. It just struck me as odd, and I have no recollection whether it was like that (or close) when I acquired it, or if I felt there was some reason to...
I dunno, it's been a long time and the reality is I have to accept that I was once young and knew it all, now I am far older and know far less. But bigger/more is always better, right?

I am in the process of ordering a throttle shaft and some parts, and I am inclined to roll back closer to its original calibration and go from there.

Thanks again though, I believe it was some of your articles that I read recently that were very knowledgeable and in depth, especially as it concerns some old misunderstandings and practices. If so I recall your comments on power valves and thinking "finally, someone explains it clearly"
It aint rocket surgury...

57
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: August 30, 2023, 07:56:35 AM »
Update-
First, I was mistaken, the carb is a 3310-1, not that it matters.

Kevin nails it. I don't know who or when, but somebody modified the throttle stop.
I don't know how that slipped by all those years, but I knew something seemed odd.

So now I have to find a solution for that issue. Throttle shaft, base plate, aftermarket stop, not sure yet.


58
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: August 28, 2023, 07:26:51 AM »
I like the red/blue fittings and steel braided hose.
Haven't grown out of my Pro Street days.

Can't add a lot to the carb discussion, but a downleg 3310 can be a really sweet carburetor. Many have gone very fast with one.
Of course its a matter of taste, which is subjective.
I think I overdosed on the red/blue/stainless braid over those years.

And yeah, this specific carb has been a good one. Worked well, no problems.
The only thing I ever really did was go to a light sec. spring (Relatively light stick car with some gear) and bump the sec. stop open a tik due to a little cam to keep the primary idle circuit where it wants to be.

59
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: August 28, 2023, 07:20:34 AM »
Thanks to both of you, and so far- agreed.
And my vague description of "cleaning and freshening it up" I did mean a soft parts kit.

My intention is to return to the original jetting to start- per the Holley specs. ("out of the box wouldn't specifically apply, as I got it used sometime in the 70's)

As I recall it, the general consensus (and my own experiences) left me inclined to think "universal" models were often jetted safe, and I often ended up leaning them out 1 or 2 jet sizes. While OE specific models were often closer.
This is a (I think its 33100?) that research describes being originally used on a 69' Chebby 396, not that it means anything.

Another related question- When I last messed with this I was planning a track day and wanted to try a 1" spacer. I have since decided that was likely either a mistake or wasted effort on this dual plane manifold and not likely to give the slight top end MPH bump I might have hoped for.
When setting that up, I recall checking the throttle for fully opening at WOT. Not paying close attention, I made an adjustment that as it turns out- causes my lead foot to open the throttle past WOT by perhaps 15% or so, as there is no real built in stop at full open.
Is it common to acquire or fabricate something for this condition?

BTW, it may be common knowledge to others, but on these vac secondary carbs, it is quite possible that opening the primaries 115% and having the secondaries open fully the link rod can drop down in its slot and upon throttle release, jam the secondaries wide open.
Guess how I know...

Holley has made at least a dozen versions of the “3310”, they are up to at least 3310-11 so far, plus more sub variants. The early ones had a secondary metering block, then Holley went to secondary metering plates, without a power valve. Add into that differences between down leg boosters & straight leg, internal passage differences, air bleed changes, etc. Always best to be sure of the exact version you have. And of course only the original version with date codes during car production were used on the actual Ch**y applications, so the vast majority, even of the early ones were just aftermarket.

Any 3310 SHOULD have a positive stop to keep from going past full throttle. I’ve included a picture showing the arm and how it contacts the base. Check yours over carefully - it maybe has been modified, or is broken. But that could be very dangerous. Replacement throttle arms are available if there’s a problem with yours. You can get add-on mechanical throttle stops too, I think Moroso still makes one. They’re not a bad idea to keep from bending/breaking the throttle arm on the carb. We use them sometimes when bracket racing to adjust ET, but they’re not a bad idea just from the safety aspect. 


Ooh! Thanks for including the pic! I appreciate the extra effort!

I am pretty sure this thing is a 3310-0, but I would need to go out to my workbench and re-check.
And I need to look at the base pate assy. I don't think it looks like that one at all! Might have to dig out some other old example for inspection as well, this is intriguing.

60
FE Technical Forum / Re: Carb questions
« on: August 28, 2023, 07:16:35 AM »
Thinking has changed from the '60-'70s on many things fuel related.  First, you may have to enrichen the carbs primary jets to get the benefit of the 10% ethanol gasoline used today.  If you get a pinging on acceleration, then you need to slow down the advance curve or jet up the primary jets to compensate for the ethanol, or both.  Nearly every carburetor I have dyno tested over the last 10 years or so have needed the jetting increased on the primary side.  That includes QF, Holley, Edelbrock, and Pro Systems carbs in every size from 500 cfm to 1250 single carbs.  Joe-JDC
Thanks Joe, I hadn't really fully considered the effect of the ethanol in pump gas as it pertains to this, but you are obviously correct.
Back when this engine was first built, the primary fuel issue was lead content and valve seats of course. I initially thought I would be running either some leaded race gas blend or additives, but as time went on and I learned more, I ran more and more pump gas and never detected any signs of issues. The valve lash (solid flat tappet) certainly never wandered a bit.
I did run some pump gas after 10% ethanol became common, but this thing never seemed to care much what I put in it as far as I noticed.
But the stoichiometry and its effect on jetting considerations has me re-thinking things a bit. Thanks again for the suggestion.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5