Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TimeWarpF100

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 46
31
Non-FE Discussion Forum / 2.8 hp per cu in at tire on my 1966 F100 pump gas
« on: November 10, 2021, 03:46:06 PM »
Made a trip to the dyno to test the 213 cu in 6 this morning.

E51 pump gas here in az it made 602.93 hp @ 5675 hp and 658.2 TQ @ 3467 rpm at Tire!

That was when the torque management system said that was enough and closed the throttle a few times during run. 

Now back to the FE projects . . .

32
FE Technical Forum / Re: The dreaded clunk
« on: October 28, 2021, 10:25:27 PM »
Quote from: Royce on October 21, 2021, 01:14:20 PM
Of the oil pump drive shaft falling into the pan.. Last idiot in this engine did not install the retainer washer and just as the distributor was to clear the manifold it dropped out... Anyone have any clever ways to retrieve it without removing the pan or front cover?  Leave it at the bottom of the pan?

What pan are you using? I have pulled plenty out thru the drain plug hole.

33
Drag Strip Results for FE Powered Vehicles / Re: 1966 Fairlane GTA street trim, maiden voyage
« on: October 28, 2021, 08:29:43 PM »
Quote from: 4twennyAint on September 21, 2021, 09:43:24 PM
Our maiden voyage in the GTA!  True street trim, front sway bar attached, air cleaner on, no ram air, 32 deg total timing advance, full exhaust.  Stiff suspension, small tires and a powerful Survival engine (576 HP pump gas) required a conservative launch.

Performance Summary:
      1/4 mile ET: 11.677             1/4 mile MPH: 116.97
      1/8 mile ET:  7.513             1/8 mile MPH:  95.34
      60 foot time: 1.899
      Track:  Beaver Springs, PA
      Weather Conditions:  nice, sunny, low 70s

Vehicle Use:
street: has rack and pinion front suspension with sway bar and a/c

Model Year: 1966
Model:  Fairlane GTA
Style: hard top

Engine Details:  1964 center-oiler block, SCAT 4.25 kit, 10.6:1, Survival heads as cast, Comp flat tappet solid (specs only Barry knows) 1.75" headers, Edelbrock Performer RPM, 1969 Holley 950 Vac Sec 3 barrel, MSD RTR diz.

Transmission: C6 'rollerized'

Torque converter details (if automatic):  Boss Hog 11 inch 2800 stall

Driveshaft: steel

Rear end type: N-case 31 spline
Differential type: 3.50
Gear Ratio: Auburn Pro
Axles: Strange 31

Front tires: cheapo radials
Front wheels: 15x6 styled steel

Rear tires: 255/60R15 M/T drag radial
Rear wheels: 15x8 styled steel

Front suspension information:  Mustang II A-arm rack and pinion, sway bar attached

Rear suspension information: stock, Lakewood slapper bars

Ready-to-race vehicle weight, including driver: not sure maybe 3700

Nice looking car!

I sure miss not having a 66-67 Fairlane or Comet

34
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: My 1966 F100 Short Bed Re-Power 2020 Raptor Crate Engine with 10spd Auto
« on: October 13, 2021, 08:37:58 PM »
Quote from: Stangman on August 09, 2021, 03:16:23 PM
No wonder you cant find alot of 65/66 trucks out there Time Warp has them all!!. Very nice work.

HA!  Thanks! Just finishing up a few last touches on this one.

I currently have 2 FE powered '66 Trucks in the works. Fresh build started assy on the all new FE today.

2 FT powered '66 trucks in the works too!

Latest video on the Raptor powered 10 speed truck. 2500 trouble free miles so far.

Took it to a large show saturday and it was 250+ vehicles. not sure how but pulled off the "Best Paint" award!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RihZpIdB1Cw

35
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: My 1966 F100 Short Bed Re-Power 2020 Raptor Crate Engine with 10spd Auto
« on: October 13, 2021, 08:34:20 PM »
Quote from: e philpott on August 08, 2021, 08:42:31 AM
Beautiful work !

Thanks much!

36
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: My 1966 F100 Short Bed Re-Power 2020 Raptor Crate Engine with 10spd Auto
« on: August 07, 2021, 11:00:46 PM »
Over last 30 days I now have working A/C, PATS, TPMS and a few more features.

Now it's time to get back on my FE projects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7bu0pm2D-4

37
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: R12 refrigerant ... do ya need license to sell ??
« on: July 25, 2021, 03:50:48 PM »
Quote from: winr1 on July 23, 2021, 02:35:11 AM
Thanks guys  :)

TW, ya have PM



Ricky.

Replied! Thanks

38
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: R12 refrigerant ... do ya need license to sell ??
« on: July 23, 2021, 12:37:56 AM »
Quote from: winr1 on July 15, 2021, 08:43:51 PM
I have 2 cans of R12 left  I will never use

I see a bunch on ebay ..  do I need a license to sell them ??



Ricky.

Supposed to be in order to buy or sell but nobody checks!

I did get the government license for it years back.

Since I still have 2 FE powered trucks with AC I could use a couple extra cans.

Keeping them both R12 if I can.

39
FE Technical Forum / Re: Factory Forged 428 $ Crank?
« on: July 23, 2021, 12:34:26 AM »
Quote from: bulletpruf on July 18, 2021, 01:25:01 PM
Buddy of mine is a hardcore Ford guy who has been around a while.  He recently picked up some FE bits including an NOS 3.98 stroke crank with the $ sign.  Basically a 427 steel crank but with the 428 stroke.  He doesn't know if he wants to use this in a max effort build or sell it/trade it for a stroker crank.

I haven't heard of these, but did find this thread when I searched - http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/fe-talk/39236-stock-428-steel-crank.html

Anyone have any info?  Any ideas on value? 

Thanks

Scott

Hey Scott! Good to see ya here!

40
Member Projects / Re: My FE Powered 1966 F100 "Project"
« on: June 17, 2021, 11:56:46 PM »
Got the N Crew home.

Pulled the pan and found the engine had very few miles on full rebuild. Fresh bore, pistons etc. $ Steel Crank. Sitting 31+ years after rebuild I filled the cylinders with Kroil and marvel mystery oil. Used in excess of a gallon total. Cranked engine and am sure a bunch of kroil and marvel mystery got down exhaust. Today I fired it up and drove it for first time.

Inc this vid a total of 5 min 30 seconds of run time. I totally expect the smoking to quit but could be a while. Also had rats nests in both mufflers, exhaust that blew out when I started it.

Runs great considering all I did was rebuild the carb with no adjustments at this point. Also put in a new set of points. Changed oil, filter, new fuel pump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15qxmWBHxCU

41
Member Projects / Re: 1956 SOHC Thunderbird Project.
« on: June 15, 2021, 07:53:13 PM »
Quote from: 427rouser on June 09, 2021, 09:09:46 AM
Update getting closer on the SOHC being completed, looking forward to dropping it in the bird and get some headers made.

Now that's a cool project!

42
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: My 1966 F100 Short Bed Re-Power 2020 Raptor Crate Engine with 10spd Auto
« on: June 15, 2021, 07:49:05 PM »
Quote from: cjshaker on June 15, 2021, 07:14:52 PM
Quote from: TimeWarpF100 on June 15, 2021, 01:25:33 PM
Looks like 500 RWHP and 25 MPG is possible. At least if it's kept under 60 MPH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3Vj9KOe5gM

That is just an awesome truck. Can't say I like all the junk under the hood, but having a modern drivetrain would be nice for a long haul driver. I imagine the truck is probably at least half a ton lighter than its modern counterpart, so that certainly helps with mileage. The dash gauges, while being modern, still don't look bad in there either. You, sir, have one hell of a nice truck!

Thanks Doug!

Since I already have 3 1966 Trucks that are FE powered and 2 1966 Trucks that are FT powered for what I wanted in a long distance driver with little to no maintenance a FE was just too costly to do especially at this HP level.  I should easily be able to go from Phoenix to Southern California and back home on a tank of fuel. Yesterday I was out driving and had forgot to hook up the electric fans and temp never got over 176 deg. Hottest days of year now with 116 today and 118 forcast for Thursday and Friday.

Underhood is a little busy yeah but if anything goes wrong I can go to about any dealer in country for off the shelf parts.

Not only that but it was a HUGE Challenge to get this done and make it all work. Intention was a 1966 Truck I could take on a Lower 48 state trip with hopefully minimum issues and reasonable on gas. 4x the cost if I had done so with the 482. 

Modern stuff is nice for daily driver but the cost of depreciation alone for just a year or 2 tops paid for this entire job! At a fraction of cost of what a same power FE would be.

My other daily driver is a 1966 F100   with a 352 and  3 spd OD good truck but getting a bit weathered. Building a clone of my dad's out of this one. I have a very basic .020 390 with proper machine work on engine stand ready to go together. The current engine will go in yet another '66 F100 or F250.

With 10 1965-66 trucks all told can't make em all FE's

I also have another 1966 F100 Ranger 352 Factory OD but it's scattered all over shop all apart.

43
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: My 1966 F100 Short Bed Re-Power 2020 Raptor Crate Engine with 10spd Auto
« on: June 15, 2021, 01:25:33 PM »
Looks like 500 RWHP and 25 MPG is possible. At least if it's kept under 60 MPH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3Vj9KOe5gM

44
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: My 1966 F100 Short Bed Re-Power 2020 Raptor Crate Engine with 10spd Auto
« on: June 05, 2021, 11:06:48 PM »
Quote from: HarleyJack17 on June 01, 2021, 01:50:57 PM
Very Very Slick! How is the power and feel so far?
What paint Single Stage or Base and Clear? Looks better than new! Even the chrome!

Low rpm power is unreal even though not building much for boost. Forgot to tighten clamps on tunes from turbos to intercooler! Only 9.5 miles so far. Test drive I had no lights of any kind.

Doing up harnesses for that now. Hoping I can start piling on the miles by next weekend.

Outside of truck is PPG 2 stage. Bottom side is PPG single stage. Still needs sand n buff once it’s all complete.

Quite a few llooonnnggg weekends in it now!

45
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: My 1966 F100 Short Bed Re-Power 2020 Raptor Crate Engine with 10spd Auto
« on: June 05, 2021, 11:01:55 PM »
Quote from: winr1 on May 31, 2021, 08:25:53 PM
Thanks for the ride  :)

I'm a bit partial to the 482/s exhaust tone  ;D



Ricky.

It did sound good!
Just not ideal for those out of state drives or the planned lower 48state trip!

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 46