31
FE Technical Forum / Re: Edelbrock intake differences
« on: August 17, 2022, 08:27:03 PM »
Thanks to all for the ideas.
Apologies to Jay for not looking at the Comparo: I have no good excuse. I tend to believe there is a time and place for the Ebrock 390.
Dizzy: Yes, I have a vacuum advance and like it. I think it's fairly well dialed in but going on personal preferences and a stopwatch there.
HP demand: I get what FrozenMerc is saying about needing X amount of power at a given speed though I figure this much displacement is wasting more gas just by running than it actually needs when the truck is empty. Lower rpms should permit it to waste less gas.
Gear vendor: Maybe it's costing me power and mpg but sure seams like a lot. I like it if for nothing else than splitting 3rd and 4th and lower rpms on the freeway. Perhaps it contributes to the overall stacking of tolerances.
Cam change: Thought crossed my mind but in no hurry to do that because it costs decent amount of money and time. Plus I think I have a few other things to try first.
Engine not meeting my needs: Thought that comment might have been a joke but in case it wasn't...We have a 2002 Duramax we've used it to pull our fifth wheel through 40 of the lower 48. And we really like it. If that somehow gets fubarred, I'd seriously consider finding an '80s or 90's crewcab to stick this 482 in and pull our camper around the country because I like it that much. Really, I'm just puzzled why lower rpms didn't help mpg. Thought intake was something to consider. Now I'm thinking carb adjustment might benefit.
Carb PV: That's something I need to read up on...as well as get a new O2 sensor. That's sounding like my first thing to check.
Apologies to Jay for not looking at the Comparo: I have no good excuse. I tend to believe there is a time and place for the Ebrock 390.
Dizzy: Yes, I have a vacuum advance and like it. I think it's fairly well dialed in but going on personal preferences and a stopwatch there.
HP demand: I get what FrozenMerc is saying about needing X amount of power at a given speed though I figure this much displacement is wasting more gas just by running than it actually needs when the truck is empty. Lower rpms should permit it to waste less gas.
Gear vendor: Maybe it's costing me power and mpg but sure seams like a lot. I like it if for nothing else than splitting 3rd and 4th and lower rpms on the freeway. Perhaps it contributes to the overall stacking of tolerances.
Cam change: Thought crossed my mind but in no hurry to do that because it costs decent amount of money and time. Plus I think I have a few other things to try first.
Engine not meeting my needs: Thought that comment might have been a joke but in case it wasn't...We have a 2002 Duramax we've used it to pull our fifth wheel through 40 of the lower 48. And we really like it. If that somehow gets fubarred, I'd seriously consider finding an '80s or 90's crewcab to stick this 482 in and pull our camper around the country because I like it that much. Really, I'm just puzzled why lower rpms didn't help mpg. Thought intake was something to consider. Now I'm thinking carb adjustment might benefit.
Carb PV: That's something I need to read up on...as well as get a new O2 sensor. That's sounding like my first thing to check.