91
FE Technical Forum / Sonic check results, need opinions
« on: July 01, 2018, 10:15:23 AM »
In the non-FE forum, you'll see me whining about what really was my inexperience with the tool, combined with some tricks of the trade to make it go easier.
Looking for opinions on what I ended up with
These are all minimum numbers, as any direction and clock position was bigger, so rather than post everything, I am just posting the numbers I think are significant, anything not listed here was .177 to over .200
Looking at drivers side bank, outward edge toward freeze plugs, I found my thinnest cylinders about 1.5 inches from the deck, all on one bank, pass side was significantly better
5 - 0.126 6 - 0.134 7 - 0.118 8 - 0.134
If adjusted for a "worst case" torque plate hone to 4.09 (I mention that because they likely won't need the full .010 to get there). I would end up at:
5 - 0.121 6 - 0.129 7 - 0.113 8 - 0.129
It gets thicker as you go deeper, the passenger side of the block is thicker, and all dimensions around the block are thicker than those minimums.
Game plan is max 500 hp engine cammed for 5500-ish peak. Not a racer, in a 4x4 street truck, but planning a 4032 forged piston as tight in the bore as I can with either a 1.0/1.0/2.0 ring pack, or potentially a 1.5/1.5/3.0 and want to make sure bore is stable
Thoughts? Specifically on the .113 number? Also, knowing a sonic checker seems to be voodoo on a round cylinder, would you run 10% less than .113 if we added a WAG factor?
Thanks
Looking for opinions on what I ended up with
These are all minimum numbers, as any direction and clock position was bigger, so rather than post everything, I am just posting the numbers I think are significant, anything not listed here was .177 to over .200
Looking at drivers side bank, outward edge toward freeze plugs, I found my thinnest cylinders about 1.5 inches from the deck, all on one bank, pass side was significantly better
5 - 0.126 6 - 0.134 7 - 0.118 8 - 0.134
If adjusted for a "worst case" torque plate hone to 4.09 (I mention that because they likely won't need the full .010 to get there). I would end up at:
5 - 0.121 6 - 0.129 7 - 0.113 8 - 0.129
It gets thicker as you go deeper, the passenger side of the block is thicker, and all dimensions around the block are thicker than those minimums.
Game plan is max 500 hp engine cammed for 5500-ish peak. Not a racer, in a 4x4 street truck, but planning a 4032 forged piston as tight in the bore as I can with either a 1.0/1.0/2.0 ring pack, or potentially a 1.5/1.5/3.0 and want to make sure bore is stable
Thoughts? Specifically on the .113 number? Also, knowing a sonic checker seems to be voodoo on a round cylinder, would you run 10% less than .113 if we added a WAG factor?
Thanks