Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - jayb

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 25
151
***********************Wednesdays events were added part of the way down the page****************

Before I get into what happened today, here are few more details about the positively hellish day on Tuesday.  Leaving the hotel Tuesday morning, we were driving directly into the rising sun in the east, and with no defrosters in the car, and limited ability with my wipers and a towel to keep the windshield clear, I had to come to a dead stop about 50 yards after leaving the hotel parking lot; I just couldn't see well enough to drive.  Eventually we got the windshield cleared and by shielding my eyes and sticking my head out the window, I finally got the car moving down the frontage road without hitting anything.  Leaving the frontage road and going out onto the main road, we were again headed directly east, but with the surrounding traffic we were able to stay located in our lane and keep up safely with the traffic.  But visibility of the road signs was pretty much non-existent, and as a result we ended up missing our turn to the North to get to the track.  Turning my car around with the trailer attached is no mean feat, but we found a large enough parking lot to do it, and headed back the other direction at least we could see what we were doing.  The delays got us to the track late, but only by a half hour or so.

At the track we got the car changed into race trim, and then I looked at the steering rack.  I had suspected that it had moved, but a visual inspection didn't show anything real obvious.  However, one of the nylon bushings that held the rack in place appeared to have gone slightly concave, and in the direction that would have caused the offset steering wheel I was dealing with.  So, I loosened the clamps and with a hammer and drift, tapped the steering rack back in the opposite direction.  It didn't even really appear to move, even after several hard taps, but looking at it closely afterwards it didn't appear pushed quite into the concave portion of the nylon bushing.  I figured I'd done the best I could with that, so I tightened the clamps on the rack, put the car back on the ground, and took a test drive around the pits.  I was very happy to see that the steering appeared to be back to normal, with no pulling in evidence.

I went over to the track restrooms to change into my racing gear, and then took the car out to the staging lanes.  I was pretty excited about this, because I'd never had a chance to race at this famous track before.  It was pretty cool going under the building and coming up to the burnout box, where so many famous racers had gone before.  I basically planned to duplicate my run at Gateway, except maybe leave a little higher on the RPMs with the trans brake.  On the launch, though, the car didn't feel the same as it had at Gateway, not quite as controlled.  Nevertheless, it did go straight down the track, and my shift was on time, so overall it felt like a pretty good run.

As I came back down the return road I stopped at the timing shack, and the slip said 8.88 at 149.  Just a little better than Gateway, which was cool.  I continued down the return road, but just as I got even with the starting line, the car sputtered and died.  I started it and it fired right up, but then quit again almost immediately.  Then it refused to start at all.  Great, what now?

I got out of the car and got some help from some of the guys hanging around the track to push the car out of the way of the return road.  Eventually Joel and Jeff (Joel's helper, aka Trunk Monkey in Training) and I pushed the car all the way back to the pits so I could work on it.  After first thinking it was the ignition switch and finding that to be functioning properly, I started checking the cam and crank sensors.  The cam and crank sensors have a connector that screws on the end, and contains two LEDs.  The green LED shows that the sensor has power, and the yellow LED flashes when the crank or cam spins.  The crank sensor's yellow LED was not flashing when I turned the engine over, and when I pulled the connector to check the voltages on the pins, one voltage was not correct.

At this point, the problem was either the cable with the connector on the end was bad, or the voltages feeding the  cable were no longer correct.  The only way to figure out which was which was to pull the wiring harness out from under the dash.  This is a real pain on my car, because its jammed in their pretty tight; here's a picture of the wiring panel removed, and sitting in front of the front seat:



Quite a mess as you can see, but at this point I was able to confirm that the voltages feeding into the cable were correct.  So, the problem had to be the cable itself.

This would have been a major problem except that I had ordered a spare cable and sensor a couple weeks ago, to bring with me on the trip.  So, I pulled out my spare cable and began to wire it in.  This was no easy task given where the cable had to be routed, and I just twisted and the taped the cable ends to the correct wires in the EFI system (rather than soldering or crimping them), but when I hit the key, the car started right up.  Somewhat relieved, I worked on getting the wiring panel put back in the car, while Steve got the car ready for the road.  We finally go out of Indy around 1:30.  I counted myself lucky that the failure occurred after a good run; if it had happened before I'd gone down the track, I don't know if I'd have been able to get it fixed in time to make a pass on Tuesday.

Rather than starting off with the directions from Hot Rod to the next track, Steve and I headed back to our hotel from the previous evening.  The FedEx package with my spare starters had arrived.  Now I had the spares I needed in case the next starter gave up.  There was a restaurant near the hotel, so Steve and I decided to have a quick lunch.  We didn't have much to eat at all on Monday, and we wanted to avoid that same thing happening on Tuesday, because being hungry just tires you out all that much more.  Finally by 3:00 we were back on the road headed for the track, and ready to start the 280 mile road trip. 

Everything was going more or less according to plan until we hit the first check point.  Going around the corner to get into the lot, we suddenly heard a very loud, screeching sound, like metal on metal.  What the heck was that?  We made it into the lot, stopped the car, and took the picture, which was the first order of business:



Next we pulled the car forward into a nearby parking lot, still making this horrible noise, and tried to figure out what was going on.  I jacked up the front of the car and spun the front wheels, and they both seemed to be fine.  But when I jacked up the rear end of the car, the rear tires were locked.  For a moment I thought I'd blown the rear end out of the car.  With Steve watching under the car, I decided to start it up and see where the noise was coming from.  Steve stopped me immediately, and said it was the driveshaft hitting the driveshaft loop.  I had just had a problem with that before I'd left for the event, and had clearanced the loops, but suddenly it was hitting again.  I crawled under the car to look at everything, and tried to figure out what was going on.  Then, suddenly, I saw it:



The photo shows my upper Watts link bar.  The  locknuts on the bar have come loose, and the bar was unscrewing itself from the rod ends.  In the process it was getting longer, and forcing the rear end of the car towards the driver's side.  Eventually, the driveshaft started hitting.

Thankfully, this was an easy fix.  I just twisted the rod to screw the rod ends back in, and tightened the  lock nuts.  Problem solved!  Steve and I were on our way. 

After we had traveled about 200 miles total for the day, we stopped to get gas at this truck stop, with a bunch of other Drag Week folks, including Vince Rasch (black Firebird), Norm (black Camaro), and Tom (blue Nova).  Here's a picture of the gas station assemblage:



From this point we got onto the freeway, including an Illinois tollway.  Unfortunately, the gas we got at this station proved to be of poor quality compared the fuel we had been getting on the road previously.  Despite being 93 octane, the engine was prone to detonation with this fuel.  Normally this engine will run easily on the 91 octane 10% ethanol blend that we get in Minneapolis, and it had run fine on other 93 octane fuels on this trip, but not the stuff.  The engine would hardly idle, and when I had to stop to pay tolls it was a challenge to keep the engine running. 

Finally though we got off the freeway and got some fuel from a different station, and the engine went back to behaving normally.  We rode through a few county roads and into a small town to hit our second checkpoint of the day, at the 250 mile mark.  However, just as we were approaching the checkpoint, the engine started to clatter a little.  Ruh-roh...  We made it to the check point and stopped to take a picture:



At the checkpoint we bumped into Kevin and his Shelby; Kevin was proceeding slowly with his 4.56 gears, but had been ahead of us because of our late start.  We decided to go across the street from the checkpoint to a Big Lots parking lot, and see if we could figure out what was going on with the car.  On the way across the street the clattering became noticeably louder.  By the time I shut the car off, I was pretty convinced it was valvetrain.  It was loudest coming from the left side, so after giving the car some time to cool, and resigning myself to the fact that, despite the late hour, I was in for a roadside repair, I pulled the right valve cover.  This is what I saw:



The #5 exhaust rocker is shot.  The needle bearings in the roller wheel are completely gone, and the wheel banging on the cam lobe was the source of the noise.  The cam lobed appeared to be somewhat scarred up, but it felt quite smooth, so I was pretty sure I could use it again, and didn't have to change cams (I did bring spares).  Steve, Kevin and I set about the work to get the top end of the left head apart.  Its no fun working on a hot motor in the dark, but we eventually got it apart.  After removing the rockers and shafts, I went in there with a magnet and got the smashed bits of roller bearings out of the head.  I was pleased to see that they had not made their way down to the oil drain at the back of the head yet, so probably the little shards of steel had not ended up in the pan.They all seemed to be localized right around the failed rocker.  After carefully picking all that stuff out, I dug out a spare rocker arm and replaced the #5 exhaust rocker on the shaft.  We re-assembled the top end of the engine, and thankfully on startup the engine sounded fine again.  That failed rocker had really made some noise!

By the way, I saw some of the other posts on the failed rocker arm, and the rocker adjusters did not fail on this rocker.  In fact, outside of the first batch of T&D rockers that I received, which had substandard adjusters, I have never had an adjuster failure.  Bill Conley's videos prove that they smoke after a short period of time at high RPM, but I'm down the track in less than 9 seconds with this car, and don't think that its an issue.

Here's a picture of the cars sitting in the parking lot during the repair:



We finally got back on the road around midnight, and made it through the rest of the route and to the hotel by about 1:00 AM.  I put the quick post from yesterday up on the board, and then fell asleep as soon as my head hit the pillow.

This morning we were up at 6:30, ready to head to Great Lakes Dragaway for Day 3 of Drag Week.  And I apologize, but I'm just going to have to finish this post tomorrow, because its 1:30 AM and I have to be up again tomorrow early for the race.

******************************* Updated from this point forward ******************

When we arrived at the track Great Lakes was jammed; I couldn't believe the number of spectators that showed up for the event.  Someone told me that this track actually runs six days per week, which is really, really great for the local racers.  Most of the rest of the competitors were already there and getting their cars ready, and cars were already going down the track too.  Steve and I took our time getting the car ready to race, and I also had decided to do an oil change on the car, so we did that also.  Finally I changed into my racing clothes and headed to the staging lanes about 10:00.  We waited in the lanes for a while, and when I finally got to the head of the line they directed me to the right lane.  I did a decent burnout and staged the car, hoping for a better launch than I'd had at Indy now that I'd found and fixed the problem with the Watts linkage.  Unfortunately, when the car left it went right this time, and within 100 feet I was out of the groove and had to shut down.  I decided to hot lap the car, and went right back around to the staging lanes, but it was now 10:30 and they had closed the lanes to the class cars, and were running the Street Machine Eliminator cars, so I had to go back to the pits and wait until noon for the open session.

Back in the pits Joel called me.  Someone he knew who was familiar with the track had been watching the live feed, and called Joel to tell him that I'd lined up way to the right of the groove at the starting line.  Great Lakes has a weird burnout box, that goes uphill, and the car tends to go right on the burnout.  Apparently a lot of people (including me) were pulling straight forward out of the box; the groove did appear to be there because of the rubber, but there was probably no VHT on that area of the track.  So if I got the right lane again it sounded like I should be lined up a couple feet to the left of where I'd been.  A few other people told me that the left lane seemed to be a lot better than the right.  When I got back up for the next session I decided I'd try to run the left lane.

While waiting for the Street Machine cars to run, Steve and I talked a little more about the car's tendency to go right on the first pass.  When we'd made the repair to the Watts linkage on Tuesday, we hadn't really adjusted the loose link so that it was equal in length to the other link.  I decided to get under the car and check that, and found that the rod I'd adjusted was now a good 1/2" shorter than the other rod.  I loosened the nuts and readjusted the link so that they were the same.  The driveshaft was now a lot closer to the loop than it had been, but I still had clearance, so I figured it would be OK.

In the pits, the number of spectators was unbelievable, people were just crowding around the cars.  Brad Dyer came over to see how I was doing; he had run a 9.06, so the pressure was on me to make a decent pass next time around.  We talked a little about our cars; Brad's weighs about 200 pounds more than my car does, but his weight distribution is better; my car is 58/42, pretty nose heavy despite the aluminum engine.  Nevertheless, I'll bet Brad is making a little more power than my car, because he is running very similar times with a heavier car.  Then I bumped into Roger Tangorra, who I raced against in Modified NA in my Galaxie back in 2009.  Roger is a friend of Brad's and Curt Johnson's, and was driving Curt's dad's car back then.  Then, sure enough Red Johnson came by and said hello.  I think Red said he was 82 years old, and he's still out at the track!  If I make it to 82, I want to be out at the track too.

I walked around the pits for a while and went over to see Brad's car, and talked with him for a while.  He was still complaining about traction problems.  Seems to me its a great sleeper car, a green Nova with a white top, single 4 dominator carb, etc.  That engine makes some serious power to run in the 8s.

Finally they started calling the class cars back to the lanes, and I got in line right away.  I wanted to have plenty of time to make several passes in case I continued to have problems.  This time they steered me to the left lane, and I took my time to do a good burnout and make sure I was lined up in the groove at the starting line.  However, I blew the launch on that pass; I revved the engine too high, then released the transbrake button as I was off the throttle, then got back on the throttle.  The car stayed in the groove and ran 9.11 with a very poor 1.44 60'.  Well, at least I had a pass that was not too far off of what the car was running, but after the first two days I'd been hoping for 8s at every track, and that wasn't getting it done.  More importantly, that pass was not as fast as Brad's, so I'd be giving up some of the lead if I turned that one in.  It was pretty much a no brainer to try again.

Back in the pits I did some checks on the car, including tire pressure, and then hopped back in to go up to the lanes.  They were starting to clear out a little now; towards the end of the Drag Week race day, the track opens up more and more and you can get to the starting line a lot quicker.  This time I only had to wait 5 minutes and I was back at the line, in the left lane again.  This time the leave was good and the car felt really strong and... then it quit 100 feet down the track.  Just like someone shut off a switch.  As I coasted down the track I was sure that I had some kind of electrical problem.  Maybe the crank sensor again?  Or a short in one of the power wires, or maybe this was the ignition switch?  The car finally rolled to a dead stop on the track, and I was just about to get out and wave for a tow, but just for grins I put the car in park and tried the key.  The engine fired right up!  WTF??

I put the car in gear and drove back to the pits.  Was the problem fuel?  I had Steve splash another couple gallons of race fuel in the tank just to be certain, checked a few other things, and didn't find any issue.  I went out to try again, hoping that the issue was intermittent and I could get a good pass in.  But the same thing happened again; out probably 50 or 60 feet, the car just quit again.  This time I slammed on the brakes instead of coasting down the track, jammed it into park, hit the key, and the car started right up again.  I drove back to the pits pretty much mystified by the car's behavior. 

Back in the pits I decided that I'd better run a datalog on the EFI system during the next pass to see if I could figure out what was going on.  Logically it seemed like an electrical problem, but I couldn't shake the feeling that it was fuel related.  I looked in the tank and sure enough there was plenty of fuel in there, but after getting set up to run the datalog I thought that to eliminate any fuel pump issue, I could just hard wire the electric fuel pump to the battery to eliminate that possibility.  This was going to be pretty easy because I have an Aeromotive fuel pump controller in the trunk.  This controller gets four wires for the fuel pump:  power and ground from the battery to the controller, and power and ground from the controller to the pump.  All four wires were connected to the controller via a four position terminal block.  I could just remove the wires from the terminal block and tie them together.  I opened the trunk and looked at this setup, and just instinctively reached in to tug on the wires.  To my surprise, one of the ground wires pulled right out of the terminal block!  I let go of it, and the tension of the wire put it right back in place!  Ah HAH!  I got a trouble light and looked at the terminal block, and sure enough, the screw for the wire had backed out a little.  It looked like when I accelerated, the inertial force on the wire pulled it far enough out of the terminal block to kill the fuel pump.  Then, when the car slowed down, the wire popped back into place and made contact.

I loosened the screw even more, shoved the wire back into its spot on the terminal block, and tightened the heck out of the screw.  I wasn't 100% sure that this was the problem, but it sure looked like it.  At this point I was running out of time; less than one hour remained for me to make a pass.  I quickly got the car ready to go and went up to the staging lanes.  There was almost nobody there, so I just stopped in the lanes long enough to get strapped in and get my helmet on, and I was motioned up to the burnout box.  I did my normal burnout, staged the car, started the datalogger, and pulled into the beams.  The car launched really hard and straight, and this time it didn't quit!  I had a good run going and I knew it.  The shift light flashed, and I went for second - and inexplicably went right by into neutral!  The engine banged off the rev limiter as I pulled the lever back to second and continued down the track.  I was filled with rage; how could I have screwed up that shift??

As I came down the return road I had already decided to hot lap the car; I was just angry with myself about missing that shift, and I was not going to let that pass stand.  At the timing shack they gave me the slip, and the car had run a 1.282 60 foot time, best ever.  I was on my way to at least an 8.80 pass before I shoved that shifter too far forward.  I kept going right down the track road to the staging lanes, and it was a good thing that nobody got in my way, because I was in the mood to run something over.  I didn't event take off my belts and helmet or pull down the window net, and there was nobody in line, so I rolled right around to the left lane burnout box again.  I did the burnout and pulled to the line, and tried to leave exactly the same way as before.  The launch was good, but not as good as the previous one.  This time I paid attention and did not miss the shift.  As I crossed the finish line I knew I had a good pass.  Coming around to the timing shack Joel was standing there and gave me a thumbs up.  The slip said 8.943@ 150.00 MPH.  Finally!  A pass that should keep me ahead of Brad in the race.

When I got back to the pits I got out of the car and relaxed for a few minutes, but then I heard a piece of bad news.  Someone told me that Brad's car was on the trailer!  He came up a couple minutes later to congratulate me on the pass, and said he broke a connecting rod and was done.  I sure could empathize with him on that, based on what happened to me last year.  Brad and I had been having a good race, and at this event its good to have someone pushing you to go faster, so I felt like it was a loss for both of us.  No one wants to win at Drag Week because the other guy breaks.  I gave Brad my condolences, and wished him luck on the repair.  He's a really nice guy, and a great competitor, and I hope I see him again next year at Drag Week.

After relaxing for a while I turned in my time slip and Steve and I got the car back in street trim.  The directions said it was only a 160 mile trip today, which seemed pretty easy after 260 miles and 285 miles the first two days.  Of course, the directions were screwed up, and they missed counting a 22 mile section in the middle, but it was still a fairly short trip.  With his 4.56 gears Kevin was running slower than Joel and I during the trips between tracks, but we ran with him for a while Wednesday afternoon.  Here's a shot of his car ahead of mine, through the windshield:



A few miles down the road we hit the checkpoint, a drive-in:



We made it to Cordova around 8:00 PM, and went right by the track and across the river into Iowa towards our hotel.  We stopped at a local place called Sneaky Pete's for dinner.  I thought it was fitting that I get a picture of my SOHC powered car, in front of Sneaky Pete's:



We got back to the hotel by about 11:30, and I typed my blog for a while but then got really tired and hit the sack by 1:30 AM.  Sorry I had to type the second half of this post later, I just couldn't get it done Wednesday night.

152
Drag Week 2015 / Drag Week 2015 Day 2, Lucas Oil Raceway
« on: September 16, 2015, 01:07:07 AM »
Today was an exhausting, brutal day at Drag Week, and I don't have time to write a full report, just a quick synopsys.  I will try to fill in the blanks tomorrow. The only good news was that the car went a little faster, 8.88 compared to the 8.91 on the first day.  But coming down the return road the car quit, and it turned out to be an electrical problem that took several hours to debug and repair at the track, before we could get on the road.  Then at the first trip checkpoint the car started making a horrible sound, and it turned out that one of the Watts linkage bars holding the rear end in place had loosened up and extended, moving the rear end over in the chassis and forcing the driveshaft against the loop.  That was also probably why the car didn't leave the same today as it had been doing at Gateway.  Fortunately that one was an easy fix, but at the second check point at 9:00 PM tonight, my #5 rocker arm gave up and the engine started making all kinds of racket as a result.  We had to diagnose and fix that problem with one of my spare rocker arms.  Several other minor issues came and went today also.  Just made the hotel at 1:00 AM, but will be at the track in the morning.  I will try to write more detail with some pictures tomorrow night, assuming that I get into the hotel at a reasonable hour  ::)

153
Drag Week 2015 / Drag Week 2015 Day 1, Gateway Motorsports Park
« on: September 15, 2015, 12:24:21 AM »
We were up early this morning, and off to the track by 7:15.  We had a lot to do; the truck and trailer had to be unloaded, then the truck and trailer had to be moved to the impound area, and the car had to be set up to race before we could  run.  We got most of the unloading done by 8:30, and then it was time for the driver's meeting.  It was hosted by David Freiburger, David Kennedy (current editor of Hot Rod), and Keith Turck (race director for the event).  We heard the usual stuff about the sponsors, and thanks for participating, and then they went into a little about the rules that were different this year.  One of the things I thought was interesting was that they had set a minimum weight limit on some of the classes, including the street race classes, so that after each pass the participant had to stop by the scale on the return road and get weighed, to make sure they weren't under the minimum for that class.  That's a good rule, I think, to keep any super light weight cars out of those classes; an extremely light car wouldn't meet the general intent of those classes anyway.

After about half an hour they turned us loose, and we had an additional half hour to get the truck and trailer into impound.  Steve took care of that while I worked on finishing up getting the car ready to race.  I'd had the same plugs in the car for quite some time, so I pulled those and installed fresh plugs.  I also drained the vent can in the dry sump setup to make sure that it wouldn't start puking oil out the breather on top.  Blair Patrick gave me a call about then; he had seen my post about the starter issues and wondered if I had a mid plate in the car.  I didn't, and explained to him that the car runs the factory block plate between the bellhousing and block, and that indexes the starter in the correct position.  However, the block is aftermarket (Shelby) and so is the flywheel (ATI), so it may be possible that these two items stack up their tolerances somehow and make the starter too close of a fit to the flywheel, causing my starter problems.  After hearing all that, Blair suggested that I get TWO starters delivered to the next track, just in case.

When Steve got back from dropping off the truck, I got this picture of my car, Kevin's car, and Joel's car in the pits:



I think that is a great looking trio, even if one doesn't have an FE  ;D  They had already called the class cars to the lanes, so I went up there and got into the third group of cars that were going to run.  The guy in front of me turned out to be in my class, and also from the Minneapolis area, so we talked for a while about cars in our area.  His car was a mid 60s Nova with a small block and a Hilborn injection setup converted to EFI.  He was figuring  on running mid 10s, and thought he wouldn't be competitive but wanted to run the event and see if he could finish.  I told him about all my troubles over the last four years, and he asked me when I was planning to break this year  ;)

Jack Miller and his son Scott were also nearby in the staging lanes, so I was over talking to them for a bit.  While I was there Brad Dyer came by; Brad won the Modified NA class last year in his Nova, averaging around 9.30 I think, and figured to be competitive again this year.  He came over and thought that Jack Miller's car was mine, and wanted to know how many cars I actually had LOL!  He wished me luck and took off; he figures to be stiff competition this year. 

For quite a while the staging lanes had not been moving, but then suddenly they started our lanes towards the starting line.  I was counting the number of starts I had on my starter, and I was up to about 11, with no further issues.  I'm going to try to keep track of that this week.  Anyway, as we moved forward I got into my race gear, and Steve was waiting for me up near the starting line.  Steve does a great job in the staging lanes and at the line, compared to my old trunk monkey, who would flit off at the slightest impulse to get pictures of some Dodge or Plymouth.  I've had to push my car through the staging lanes by myself with that old trunk monkey  ;D

I had decided for this first pass to use the trans brake, but not really to its full potential.  The converter stalls around 5600 RPM on the launch, and for this pass I just wanted to rev it at the line to 4000 or so on the brake, then release the brake and mash the accelerator.  Not really a transbrake launch, but over about 3000 RPM its difficult to hold the car on the line with the footbrake technique.  I had also decided that I would rev the engine a little higher than yesterday; I had shifted right at 7000 RPM yesterday, and I thought I'd be better off shifting at 7300 or so.  I had not reset the shift light; I planned to just delay my shift a moment after the shift light came on, and see how the time came out.  I did have the rev limiter on the car set at 7500, which was 300 RPM down from where it had been set last year, in deference to the engine's lower RPM power curve.

After a problem or two on the track, I made it to the front of the line and was motioned into the burnout box.  I did a 5000-5500 RPM burnout, shifting from first to second, and spun out of the box to get the water off the tires.  I pulled slowly to the line and got staged, pressed the transbrake button and revved to 4000 RPM.  The pro tree flashed and I was really late, but of course at Drag Week that doesn't matter, at least in my class.  The car left hard, just like yesterday, and felt maybe a bit stronger off the line.  Again it went dead straight, which was great news.  The shift light came on and just as I made the shift I heard the engine hit the rev limiter; I was too late with the shift.  The car ran down the track hard, and I was wondering if I'd hit the rev limiter in the traps, and sure enough probably 75 or 100 feet before the stripe the rev limiter came in.  I kept my foot in it though, and then coasted down to the end of the track, and around the return road.  Steve had already grabbed my time slip and as I coasted by he opened the door and shouted "8.91!"  That was a big surprise; I'd figured that maybe I'd picked up two tenths over yesterday, but not three!  MPH was only 149, which I thought was a little low, but probably due to the rev limiter issues.  Sixty foot was definitely better than yesterday at 1.32, but that too still needed some work.  I still need to learn how to drive this thing to its potential. 

Back in the pits I mulled over making another run, but with the starter issues I was facing I decided that I didn't want to put any more stress on the starter than necessary.  I'd had to start the car five or six times in the staging lanes, and it would be just my luck to be one start short of the last race.  I sat down next to the trailer and called Summit Racing, and ordered two Powermaster starters to be delivered to the next track.  Then Steve and I got to work "streetifying" the car again.  Just about the time we were finished, they called the street eliminator classes to the staging lanes.  I wanted to see Kevin and Joel run, so Steve and I took off for the grandstands to watch the racing.

Joel and Kevin almost go matched up, but Joel ended up one car ahead.  His car is a convertible with no roll bar, so 13.50 is as fast as he can go.  So what happened? He ran a 13.40!  Too fast of a time slip to turn in.

Kevin ran a little slower today than yesterday, an 11.65 I think.  He came back to the pits trying to decide if he wanted to run again and concluded in the end that he didn't want to.  For the bracket race in Street Eliminator at the end of the event, they average your time for the week and deduct one tenth, and that is your dial in for the bracket race.  Kevin can't run any faster than 11.50 in his car, so he is shooting for an 11.60 average that will let him run right on 11.50 for his dial.  He figured he could go faster on one of the next tracks and bring the average down to where he wanted it.

Joel had to hang around and run again, to get a passing ET, so he wasn't ready to leave.  Kevin said he didn't need any help getting packed up, so since Steve and I were all packed up we took off.  First stop was the gas station across the street to fill up with some street fuel.  Getting in and out of the gas station turned out to be problematic; there were a whole bunch of Drag Week cars there, and my Shelby clone has a very poor turning radius with the Fatman Fab front strut conversion.  I was lock to lock a bunch of times trying to get in and out of there.  But we finally got filled up with premium unleaded, got some ice for the cooler and some water and pop, and got going down the road according to the route provided by Hot Rod. 

As usual, the route instructions sucked badly.  As an example, they directed us to take one left turn towards two towns, Lebanon and Staunton I think.  The route instructions said "turn left towards Lebanon/Staunton".  After we made the turn, the road went to a tee with a stop sign a quarter mile away.  The signs said Lebanon to the left, and Staunton to the right!  We were left to guess which was the right way to go.  We ended up going towards Staunton, which turned out to be the right way, but I talked to at least one guy later who made the wrong choice.  I'm certain Hot Rod does this intentionally to screw things up for the racers.

Anyway, we managed to get ourselves through the route with only minor issues.  There were two checkpoints on the route that we had to document with our cameras; here's a couple shots of the first one:





Fifty miles past the first one, we encountered the second:



Total miles for the route to Indy was 266, so we still had about 170 miles to go when we left the second checkpoint.  Along the way I had noticed that the steering wheel was not centered when the car was going straight, and the car had developed a pull to the right.  Somewhere in the last 170 miles I shot this photo from the interior of the car while going down the road, and you can see the steering wheel position:



I had noticed this fairly soon after starting the trip, and had concluded that the issue had developed in the gas station parking lot next to the track.  The Fatman Fab strut kit for this car has two clamps that hold the steering rack in place, and I have had issues in the past with the rack moving in these clamps.  I was pretty sure that was what had happened.  Its not a difficult fix; you just have to loosen the clamps and slide the rack back into its proper position, but the fact that the kit is not designed well enough to securely hold the rack in place is irritating.  I've said this before; I would never recommend this kit to anyone.

Despite the pull the car was driving down the road fine, so we motored on to our hotel in Indianapolis.  The only hiccup in our trip besides the steering was that the oil breather can for the dry sump filled up and started spitting a little oil out of the breather.  When we stopped for fuel 80 miles from the hotel we found that problem, and just drained the can, and we were back on the road.  The motor didn't skip a beat the whole trip.

Going from St. Louis to Indy results in a one hour time change, so by the time we got in to our hotel it was after 10:00 PM.  We decided to work on the steering rack issue at the track tomorrow, but I did take the opportunity tonight to reset the rev limiter and shift light point in the MS3X.  I was at Indy once before at Drag Week in 2006, but we were rained out, so I'm looking forward to racing there tomorrow.  Hopefully I can run a little faster than I did today.  I'll post another update tomorrow night - Jay

154
Drag Week 2015 / Drag Week 2015 Registration and Test and Tune
« on: September 14, 2015, 12:52:09 AM »
Saturday night at the hotel the parking lot was a big mess, and by the time I squeezed my truck and trailer into the lot, and then got boxed in by some other cars, I had no idea how long it was going to take me to get out.  As a result, we changed plans this morning, and left a little later than we had originally wanted, just to make sure that we could actually leave the hotel lot.  We got into Gateway around 8:15 AM, and parked the truck and trailer behind the big circle track there.  Apparently Drag Week registration was at the circle track, to avoid conflicts with the drag race that was running on the quarter mile track.  After 45 minutes or so we had the car unloaded, the trailer unloaded from the back of the truck, and the trailer stuffed with all the things we needed for the day, and went into the circle track to get in line for registration.  Here's a picture of my car at the end of the line just after we pulled in:



As it turned out, I had pulled up right behind Jack Miller and his son, along with their helper Eugene, and directly behind a Missouri racer running a 68 Mustang notchback.  With Kevin's Shelby in front of those guys, it almost looked like an all Ford event:



Jack had brought his 68 Mustang with the twin Vortech superchargers this year, along with his son's Cougar.  Jack had decided to run Modified Power Adder, and so had his car fitted with small tires to fit into the class.  He's been testing the car over the last few weeks and says he's had it as fast as 8.50, which is the limit he can run with his roll cage.  The Cougar has a 900 HP engine in it, and should also run a very respectable time.  Pics below of Jack's Mustang and the Cougar:





All the room on the track made it look like it was going to be a much nicer setup than last year's registration, but it soon became clear that the sun was going to be an issue, because there was just no shade to be found.  As the line slowly moved around the track, we looked for shade behind trailers and the pit wall, and made a lot of runs to the concession stand for water and other refreshments.  As usual the line moved very slowly, and there were probably a good 200 cars in front of us because of our late arrival.  About every 20 minutes we would move up 150 feet or so, and I was really happy that the car started easily and didn't give me any trouble; I had been in line at Drag Week plenty of times where something had gone wrong, and I'd had to push the car.  Unfortunately this good starting luck was not to last.

By about 2:30 in the afternoon Steve and I were on the home stretch of the line, with maybe 15 cars in front of us.  When the next gap opened up in front of me, I went to start the car, and the starter made a weird noise.  Steve looked back at me from outside the car.  I tried it again and no problem this time.  It started fine the next time too, but the time after that it started making a wailing sound as soon as the engine started; I immediately shut it off.  What now?  I had some friends hanging around talking about the car, and they all pitched in to push me ahead and close up the gap in the line.  I thought about this situation for a little bit, and decided that I would try to start the car with the starter one more time, once the line went forward again.  When I did, this time there was no doubt, with a high-pitched ringing coming from the engine after it started.  I killed it right away, and knew that I had fried another starter.

Now, I had already replaced the RobbMc starter in the car about a week and a half ago.  The replacement starter was another RobbMc unit that had failed a few years ago, and I'd sent it back to be repaired, and kept it in a box under my workbench until I needed it last week.  As far as I knew this starter was in perfect working order, but it had failed on this engine in probably less than 100 starts.  I cannot account for this failure; the starters appear to be quality units, but this one just didn't last.  The starter that had failed a week and a half ago had already been back to RobbMc; he had fixed it very quickly and shipped it back to me via overnight service, at my request, so I had it with me as a spare.  But the idea that the starter I'd just installed had failed, and the one I was going to have to put in had just failed a week and a half ago, made me very nervous about the starter situation.

With the help of some friends we pushed the car ( ::)) up through the registration line, and finally got it through registration.  Then we pushed it another 300 or 400 feet through the pits until we found a spot where we could park it for the starter repair.  Steve and I had not brought the new starter with us, and the truck was a long way away, but one of the guys had a car nearby and volunteered to take Steve to the truck to get the replacement starter and the floor jack.  The test and tune was not scheduled to start until 7:00 PM, so we had some time to make the repair.  After Steve returned with the stuff I got underneath the car and after an hour or so of screwing around, got the starter installed.  The car started just fine again with the new starter.  I decided that I would have to give Summit a call on Monday morning and try to get a Powermaster starter overnighted to my hotel so that I would have a backup on Tuesday, in case I had more starter trouble.

We spent the rest of the afternoon trying to stay out of the sun, and chatting with some old Drag Week friends including Scott Clark, Jeff McConnell, Doc McEntire, Vince Rasch, Houston, James, Bubba (can't recall all the last names), etc.  Around 5:00 the track announcer came on and said that we could make our way over to the drag strip half of the track, because the other race was wrapping up.  Steve and I rode over there, and got the car ready to race by adding the parachute, removing the air cleaners, etc.  By 6:00 or so they were calling us into the staging lanes, so I changed into my racing gear and lined up. 

I had been thinking about this first pass for quite a while.  Last year, at the one track I was able to race at before Drag Week, we had experimented with the four link bar locations without much success.  That track was notorious for poor traction (Rock Falls Raceway, aka Slippery Rock), but we felt we had made some progress on the settings.  However, the car seemed to want to go left on the launch, rather than going straight.  Prior to Drag Week last year I had made another adjustment on the bars, but on the first pass of the Drag Week test and tune last year I had broken the connecting rod, so I didn't really have a good idea of what the change had done.

I had not changed the bars from last year, so this was still a new four link setting for me.  I had, however, increased the size of the wheels from 10" wide to 12" wide, to try to get more of the 11" tread width on the track.  I had been worried about what the added traction and the change in the four link would do together; the nightmare scenario was the car would pull a big wheelie and go left, and I would have to let off and damage the front end of the car.  I was thinking about this in the staging lanes, and decided that rather than using the transmission brake, I would foot brake the car for this first pass and see how it reacted. 

Pretty soon the cars started running down the track, and the line ahead of me started moving.  Each time I had to start the car I cringed, thinking of another potential starter issue, but it seemed to be behaving fine.  By 7:00 PM I was up next in the burnout box.  After the car in front of me went down the track, I did a fairly long burnout with a 1-2 shift, and pulled up to the starting line.  I got the car staged and foot braked with my left foot while holding the engine speed at 2500 RPM.  The yellows flashed (pro trees only this year at Drag Week), and I released the brake and mashed the throttle.  The front end of the car came up, but not too high; in fact a video of the launch that I saw later showed that the car didn't even pull the front wheels.  But immediately I was relieved to see that on the launch, the car went dead straight!  Two seconds into the run and I was really pleased with that.  The shift light flashed and I hit second, and the car was still straight as an arrow down the track.  I went through the traps at about 7400 RPM, and it felt like a pretty good run.

After the shut down at Gateway you have to go almost all the way back to the starting line to get your time slip, which seemed like a long way, but when I got to the timing shack Steve was already there, had the time slip and was waving me into the pits.  The car had run a 9.21 at 146, which was a really good start for this car.  Also the 60 foot time was 1.375, which is slow for this car by about a tenth, but given the foot brake start and the lack of suspension tuning, I was pretty happy with that.  My worst fears about the car going left were not realized, and I certainly had a baseline to start working the chassis issues with this week.  Steve and I went up to the concession stands and got something to drink; Steve celebrated with a beer, while I had a soft drink because I was thinking I might want to go out again.  Then we went up to the stands to watch some of the racing.

After a while Alan Casida came up in his big green Galaxie; we had already run into Alan several times during the day.  It was very interesting to watch the crowd's reaction to Alan's car.  I think most of the people around us figured it would be a 13 or 14 second car, but Alan tore off a 12.34; Steve and I were impressed, and the other folks around us were very surprised.  Alan's car looks great going down the track.  I took a picture of it with my cellphone camera, and I'll try to get it posted tomorrow.

After a while longer Kevin (thatdarncat) came up in his 67 Shelby.  He only has the factory rollbar in the car, so he is limited to running 11.50.  Kevin ran an 11.598 at 104, and with that MPH we knew he was letting off at the end of the track.  A little later Kevin ran again, and ran a duplicate 11.598 time!  Kevin is a very accomplished bracket racer, and if he makes it into the fast 32 cars in Street Eliminator, he will be tough to beat in the bracket race.

Finally Joel came up in his 67 Hemi GTX.  He had been worried about the car running a high 14 or even a 15 and being embarrased by it, but he ran a 13.80.  As a convertible with no roll bar, the fastest Joel can go is 13.50, so he was very happy with his time. 

A few cars later the track stopped for some starting line maintenance, and Steve and I decided to go back down to the car.  I had decided not to run again that evening; I would save my experimenting for the first day of Drag Week.  Back at the car I was talking to Rick Johnston from Gear Vendors, who is the chief sponsor of the event, when Steve returned to the car with a full beer.  It was his second in a fairly short time period.  When several of us commented on this, Steve suggested that we just refer to him as the "Drunk Monkey".  Naturally, that is exactly what we did, repeatedly, for the next few hours, as we packed up the truck and trailer, went out to dinner at a local restaurant, and then went back to the hotel.  I'm still laughing about it  ;D ;D  Today is Steve's 60th birthday, and after all day in the sun today he looked pretty worn out.  We will see how the Drunk Monkey handles the rest of the week.

Tomorrow morning we lock up the truck and trailer, and start Drag Week racing for real.  I'm looking forward to trying to improve on my time; hoping to get the car into the 8s sometime this week.  Also crossing my fingers that my starter lasts, at least until the backup arrives.  I'll post another report after the racing and road trip tomorrow night.


155
Edit - Sorry, but the last part of this post got cut off by the limits of the forum.  I'll post the rest as an update to this thread tomorrow night - Jay

Back in January when I started to think about this year's Drag Week event, I had decided not to write a weekly blog about it
as I have done in the past.  All I was trying to get accomplished this year was to get the car back together as it was in 2014,
so I didn't see the point of a weekly progress report.  Besides, writing the weekly report takes quite a bit of time, and
with the intake adapters and timing covers taking up my spare time, I really didn't want to commit to it.  Hindsight being
20/20, though. I should have done another blog this year.  I could not have imagined the wild ride I have been on since March
with this project.  This very long post is an attempt to recap the last few months, to show the struggle to get the car to
this year's event.  First a little background.

After the Crower rod broke in half at last year's Drag Week test and tune, I had the car back home and the engine apart by the
following Thursday, while Drag Week was still going on.  Within a week after that, I had the damaged block at a highly
recommended machine shop in Menagha, Minnesota, about three hours north of me, to see about getting the damaged block repaired,
and the crank at the local crank grinding place to be checked for damage and straightness.  Almost immediately I found out that
the crank was good, so that was a relief.  The block, though, was another story.  The machine shop wasn't immediately sure that
they could commit to salvaging the block.  After getting all the sleeves out of the block and cleaning up the damage, they
wanted to spend some time doing some welding, then corrective machining, then more welding, etc, before they were comfortable
saying that the block could be brought back to usable condition.  Along the way we decided that we would Hard-Block the block
up to the water pump holes to add strength, in addition to trying to repair the block by welding or some mechanical fastener
repair.  In the end, everything was welded, and the machining came out really well; the shop did a great job, and I was very
pleased with their work.  However, it wasn't until just before the PRI show in December that they were far enough along to say
for sure that the block could be saved.

I was waiting for that moment, because I didn't want to spend a bunch of money on new sleeves, new pistons, and new rods if the
block couldn't be fixed.  So, with the green light from the machine shop I ordered sleeves, rods, and pistons while at the PRI
show in early December.  I ordered the sleeves direct from Darton, and after talking to CP and Crower at the show, I had Blair
Patrick get me the pistons and rods.  I ended up going with Crower again for the rods, despite the failure that I experienced
last year, because Blair and I both felt that it was kind of a one-off, oddball failure.  Also, Crower was able to make up a
slightly heavier duty rod, weighing about 50 grams more than the originals I had last year, which eased my mind a little bit
regarding another beam failure.

Unfortunately, it seems like all the racing parts companies go home from the PRI show and take the rest of the month off;
nothing seems to get done between PRI and the end of the year.  Then, right at the start of the new year they are deluged with
new orders from people trying to get ready for the next racing season, so lead times are long.  I certainly experienced this
with my parts; the sleeves didn't arrive until February, and the pistons and rods didn't show up until March.  By the time
everything got here, it was nearly time to register for Drag Week.  I got the parts up to the machine shop in Menagha so they
could keep going on the work, and began thinking about the car.

Blair had been bugging me for quite some time to go smaller on the primary tubes and collectors of my headers.  I didn't think
they were that big; they are stepped headers with 2-1/8 to 2-1/4 to 2-3/8 primaries, with a merge collector that has a 3" choke
and a 4" outlet.  Pipemax says that at this size, they are too small for a 1000 HP engine, and last year this engine made 970 HP
on the dyno.  But at the dyno last summer Mark Dahlquist took one look at the headers and shook his head; he said the tubes were
too big, and the bend radiuses were too tight.  He thought I was leaving a bunch of power on the table with the headers I had. 
So, while waiting for the machine work to be finished up on the engine, I thought I would build a second set of headers for the
car.  I went down in the primary size from 2-1/8" to 2", kept the same stepped design, going to 2-1/8" and then to 2-1/4" into
the collector.  I made sure that I used 6" radius bend tubes wherever possible, and only went to 4" radius tubes where
absolutely necessary.  The original set had 3.5" or less bend radiuses on all the tubes.  Also, I didn't pay a whole lot of
attention to primary length on the new headers, and as a result these headers had slightly longer primaries than the original
set, and there were some significant tube length variations, up to 8".  The original headers had all the primaries within an
inch or so of each other.

I had been thinking about this since late in 2014, and had ordered two sets of merge collectors from Blair, one pair with a 4"
outlet and one pair with a 3.5" outlet and a smaller choke (which Blair preferred).  Those also took forever to arrive, but they
finally made it in April, so I got going on the headers by dummying in a spare block and my pair of cast iron SOHC heads.  It
took me about two weekends to fab up the headers out of some Hooker mandrel bent tubing, and then they went off for coating.  I
was ready to go with the headers by the beginning of May. 

Blair and Mark had been on me about the headers, but for my part I was concerned about the intake manifold.  I had built this
manifold as a traditional sheet metal style intake back in about 2010, but the manifold had been a compromise because of the
space contraints in the car.  I knew when I built it that the runners were too short to take advantage of the sonic tuning
effect in the RPM range I was running, but to get the runner length I needed I would have to build either a crossram manifold,
or use banana-shaped runners and raise the plenum a good 3".  Raising the plenum that high was out of the question in terms of
fit to the car, and I wasn't sure exactly how I would build a crossram intake, so I went with the shorter runners and the
standard sheet metal intake configuration. 

Here's a quick sidebar.  I may have told this story before, but in case you missed it, this intake has been referred to as the
"steaming pile" intake since a dyno session in 2011.  Prior to building this intake, the last dyno session on this engine had
been in 2009, where it had made 960 horsepower with the Hilborn injector setup.  By 2011 I had switched to the sheet metal
intake, and had high hopes for more power. 

At that time the engine was still at its original 585" displacement, but had developed water leaks between the bores and the
sleeves, which tended to put water into the oil.  This was a result of offset boring the block, done to increase the bore
spacing and run the 4.500" bore. I had broken through the aluminum on three cylinders while offset boring when the block was
new, and had used a sealer called "Seal-All" to plug these leaks when the engine was first together back in 2008.  By 2011 the
sealer was failing, so I was using Moroso Ceramic Sealer in the water jacket to try to seal up the engine again.  I had
successfully gotten it sealed up, and back on the dyno in the summer of 2011, and my pal Scott Clark had come up for the dyno
session.  But the first runs with the new intake were terrible, netting only 780 HP or so.  After trying to increase the power
and having no success, Scott said, "Man!  That intake is a steaming pile!"  After recovering from a bout of laughter, I was
forced to agree, so we tore off the "steaming pile" intake and put the Hilborn setup back on.  Guess what?  No change in power. 
Hmmmm...

We looked and looked, but didn't conclusively find the problem back then.  We did see evidence of water leakage in the oil, but
not much.  I decided to run the engine anyway, and installed it in the car and took it to Drag Week in 2011.  On the drive from
the first track to the second, the leaks got much worse, and after watching the oil pressure go down and the coolant temperature
go up while cruising down the freeway to the second track, and then finding a bunch of water in the oil, Captain Stabbin' and I
threw in the towel.  On teardown that year, I found evidence of water leaks everywhere, on the deck and between the sleeves and
the bores, so I figured I was getting water in the combustion chamber and that must be the power problem that we saw on the dyno.  But that explanation never really sat right with me, and then the next year, in 2012, I tried to use the same EFI injectors in my Mach 1 with the high riser, and found that one of them was stuck and would hardly pass any fuel.  It finally dawned on me that the injector was probably stuck during the SOHC dyno session in 2011 too, and I was running on 7 cylinders instead of 8.  Amazing what you figure out over the long haul.  So, feeling that I had found the cause of the power problem, I still had high hopes for the steaming pile intake.  Here's a picture of the intake:



After revamping the engine in 2014 with new sleeves (with O-rings to seal the water jacket), the engine was down to 577", and
made 970 HP with the steaming pile intake.  Not much better than the Hilborn setup, but still an improvement.  Despite the good
numbers, I was pretty sure I was leaving some power on the table. The intake tract was too short, at a total of 10", for my
range of RPM, based on various calculations, including PipeMax and SuperFlow's intake runner formula.  Those two agreed that I
should be shooting for an intake tract length of about 13", if I wanted a power peak in the 7000 RPM range.  The problem with
the SOHC in this regard is that the intake port is really short, less than 3" on center.  This necessitates a much longer
runner in the intake manifold than you normally see, and a conventionally designed sheet metal intake with straight runners
just won't work. 

This year, after finishing with the headers at the beginning of May, the short block parts were still not finished, so I began
to think about doing a different intake manifold for the engine too, with longer runners.  Due to the hood clearance issues and
the difficulties in fabricating a banana shaped runner, I decided to go to a crossram to get the necessary length.  I still had
the same problem that I'd had back in 2010 when I built the first steaming pile intake, which was difficulty in visualizing
exactly how the crossram would go together and fit, but since then I had learned how to use a 3D CAD program.  So I designed
my crossram intake in that program to make sure it was going to fit together properly.  About the time that I had the intake
designed and was happy with it, I got the short block back from the machine shop, ready for assembly.

This was about mid-May, and even though I only had the design finished, I decided that I really wanted to try to build the
crossram intake, which I had dubbed "Steaming Pile, Part Deux".  For the rest of May and most of June, I split my time between
assembling the SOHC, and building the intake.  I CNC machined the plenum plates and base plates for the intake, and bought
2-1/2" aluminum round tube for the runners.  I put a slight taper in the tubes by cutting a pie shaped section out of the bottom
half of each runner, then squeezing them together with hose clamps before welding, so that I had a 2-1/4" tube at the bottom of
the runner and 2-1/2" at the top.  For the original steaming pile intake I had made a welding fixture, so I used that again to
weld up this intake.  I had set the weekend of June 27-28 as the dyno weekend, and Scott and Mark were going to come up, same as
last year.  But when the big weekend arrived, Steaming Pile Part Deux was still not quite finished up, and I was still getting
the engine hooked up on the dyno when Scott and Mark arrived.

The engine was installed with the original steaming pile intake and the original headers.  The plan was to run and tune the
engine with this equipment, and then later Saturday change to the new headers, test both sets of collectors, and look for
improvements.  After the dyno session was over on Saturday I was going to complete the welding on Steaming Pile Part Deux, and
install it on the engine.  Then on Sunday we would test that intake.

Finally by 4:00 or so on Saturday the 27th we were all hooked up and ready to run.  We had some of the normal dyno issues to
contend with, and it took us until 8:00 or so to get the engine starting right, lash the valves hot, check the chain, etc., but
by the end of the day Saturday we were making some good pulls up to 6000 RPM.  We were all out of time for dyno runs at that
point (in deference to my neighbors I don't run the dyno after 8:00 PM), but Sunday was looking promising.  We were going to
have to alter our plans, and change the headers first on Sunday, and then hopefully swap the intake later in the day.  Saturday
night Mark hung around while I was working on the engine and got the welding finished up on the new intake.  Mark is a much
better welder than I am, and the intake looked great.

Sunday morning I was out to the shop early, and set the new intake up on my CNC machine to drill and tap the holes for the top
plate, and cut the groove for the O-ring to seal the top.  Mark and Scott arrived around 10:00 or so, and we got started running
pulls on the dyno about noon.  After some preliminary pulls we got up into the RPM range of interest and the engine made about
the same peak power as last year, around 970 HP, but made quite a bit more average power.  Here's a plot of the dyno data, last
year vs. this year:



Despite the power production, the engine just didn't sound right at the top end of the pulls.  Also, we had an indication from
the computer that there may be a problem.  Scott had brought his 8 O2 sensor setup, and he was running them in closed loop to
control the individual fuel injectors; using this setup you put a target air/fuel ratio into the computer, and the oxygen sensor
in each primary tube detects the air/fuel ratio in that tube, and then the computer adjusts the injector for that cylinder to
hit the desired air fuel ratio.  Scott was seeing that cylinder #5 was requiring way, way less fuel than any of the other
cylinders.  This indicated it was not using as much air as the other cylinders.  Scott thought this might be a valvespring
issue, or something along those lines, so we pulled the left valve cover to investigate.  The springs and rockers looked fine
on #5, lash was good, etc.  We decided to do a leakdown test, and was I ever surprised to see 70% leakdown on #5!  The rest of
the cylinders on the left bank had typical, low leakdown numbers.

Before I even got done checking the leakdown on the remaining cylinders it had dawned on me what the problem was.  The #5
cylinder was the one where the rod had broken last year at the Drag Week test and tune.  When I had pulled the heads off last
year, I had noticed that the chamber had taken a hit from the piston; there was a little witness mark evident from the contact. 
But it had never occurred to me that this may have also led to a bent valve!  This year when assembling the engine, I had just
cleaned up the heads and re-installed them; I had never disassembled them and taken them in to have them checked.  I was
regretting that oversight now.  After the leakdown checks were done, Mark advised me that the best course was to pull the
heads and get them checked.  I had to agree; I didn't want to continue running the engine with a potentially bent valve. 
We called it a day on the dyno session.

Monday night I tore the engine back down and pulled both heads; I had decided I'd better pull the right head and get it checked
too.  Looking at #5 chamber on the left head, I couldn't tell if the valves were bent, but the leakdown checker doesn't lie, so
I figured I just couldn't see it.  After getting the heads off, I went around and did an inspection of all the pistons, and I
was shocked to see evidence of piston to valve contact on the intake valve of #4!  Where the heck did that come from?  I looked
closely at all the other pistons, and no evidence of contact could be found.  When I had assembled the engine I had checked
piston to valve clearance on #1 and #5, and figured that was good enough, but apparently not.

The contact on piston #4 was at the very edge of the intake valve relief; it looked like the valve was about 0.020" into the
relief, and the contact was about 0.030" deep.  I was really glad that I had pulled the right head to have it checked, otherwise
I would have never seen this problem.  Here's a picture of the piston, showing the contact:



On Tuesday I took the heads and some spare valves into R&R Performance to get them checked out.  While I was there, Bryan at R&R
took the #5 valves and checked them for straightness.  Sure enough, the #5 exhaust valve was very slightly bent, leading to the
leakdown problem.  Also, the #4 intake valve was NOT bent, so the hit it had been taking due to the piston to valve clearance
issue was apparently not too bad.  The valve may have actually clearanced the piston while I was rotating the engine around on
the stand, before it even got to the dyno, so the contact may have been pretty minor once the engine was running.

On Saturday we had discussed potential reasons for the engine not sounding right at high RPM, and before finding the other
problems we'd concluded that one potential cause could have been that the valve springs needed replacement.  I decided that as
long as the engine was apart, I'd go ahead and get new valvesprings to rule out that possibility.  I'd had Comp Cams springs in
the engine, but this time I decided to go with a set of PAC springs and retainers, that had about the same specs as the Comp
springs but which were significantly lighter.  I ordered them on Monday, for delivery by Friday, when the heads would be ready
for pickup.

When I got the heads back on Friday, I got a clue as to why I had the piston to valve clearance issue on #4.  Bryan had noticed
that the threads for the #4 spark plug hole were biased towards the back of the head.  In other words, on the #4 spark plug
hole, the threads looked normal towards the back side of the head, but were nearly gone towards the front side.  It was kind of
like the tap that tapped that hole had been positioned too far towards the back of the head.  I don't know for sure, but I
assume that the spark plug hole tapping was done on the CNC machine that machined the rest of the heads.  I know there are
several setups required to machine the heads, and whenever there's a setup, there is the potential for error.  It may be that a
setup error existed on this head, and the #4 spark plug tap and #4 valve guide holes were moved towards the rear of the engine
by 0.050" or so.  Given that there was insufficient P-V clearance on this chamber and no others, and the plug hole was not
tapped properly while all the others were, this seems like a logical conclusion.  Hard to say for sure, though...

By Saturday July 4 I had the heads back from R&R and my new springs, retainers, seats, and locks had arrived from PAC. 
Unfortunately, we were hit with a brutal heat wave that weekend that limited the amount of time I could stand to be in the shop.
I don't have air conditioning in my shop, and with temperatures close to 100 and the dew point over 70, I couldn't take more
than an hour at a time before I had to go in the house and cool off.  I did manage to get the heads re-assembled with the new
PAC springs on Saturday, and I taped up the area surrounding the #4 piston, covered the rest of the engine with plastic, and
used a cartridge roll to clearance the intake valve relief on the piston so that there wouldn't be any more contact in that
cylinder.  On Sunday I spent most of the day cleaning the decks of the block and installing the heads.  Since this engine has
non-stock bore spacing it requires custom copper head gaskets, which in turn require a sealer on the deck surface.  The silicone
used for this is very difficult to remove, and it took me over an hour with a razor blade and a Scotchbrite pad on each side of
the engine to get the decks ready for installation of the head gaskets and heads.  But at least by Sunday evening the heads were
 re-assembled and back on the engine.

The heat stayed with us for an extended period, but by the next weekend I had the engine most of the way back together.  This
time around I decided to install the Steaming Pile Part Deux intake. I figured that we had enough data on the first steaming
pile manifold from the first dyno session to be able to tell if the new manifold would be an improvement, so I wanted to
assemble the engine with the new manifold this time, and see how it looked.  Here's a picture of the SP2 intake, showing the
crossram configuration and the "W" shaped plenum:



As luck would have it, Scott was again available for a tuning session the weekend of July 18, so we made plans to be running
again on the dyno that weekend. 

As usual I was running a little behind, but when Scott arrived at 2:00 on Saturday were were pretty much ready to go. The engine
fired up with no issues, and sounded good.   When we got into the RPM band of interest, we saw an immediate, large improvement
in horsepower and torque.  At 6000 RPM, which is where my converter stalls, the engine was up nearly 30 horsepower!  As we moved
the dyno testing higher in the RPM range, the engine sounded great, and we saw a peak power output of 990 HP on a pull up to
7200 RPM.  This was still with the original headers, not the revamped headers that I had built this year, so we were hopeful
that further tuning plus the header swap would get us over 1000 HP on this engine.  Here's a plot of the dyno pull we made at
this point:



Looking at this graph, though, I was a little concerned.  The last two power points were significantly down from the power peak.
 The engine had sounded great during the pull, so I wasn't sure what the issue was here.  Sometimes electrical noise can be an
issue on the dyno, and it can make the horsepower and torque curves look a little choppy, but to have two points in a row
significantly down was a little worrisome.  I wondered if we had a valve float issue with the new springs, or something like
that.  We decided the only thing to do was to run another pull and see if this behavior repeated itself.  But when we tried
to start the motor, it made half a turn and stopped.  It sounded like the battery on the dyno was going dead, so we stopped
for 20 minutes or so to let it charge.

After the 20 minutes the engine fired up and made the most awful clattering sound you have ever heard.  I immediately shut it
off, and at first couldn't believe what I was hearing.  I thought that maybe a tool had fallen into the workings of the dyno
or something and was making the noise.  As we were looking around at the engine on the dyno, my friend Steve spotted water
dripping out of the #4 header tube!  Pretty soon it was a steady stream, and was also draining out of the collector!  This was
very, very bad news.  I drained the water out of the engine to stop the leak, and then with a certain amount of fear and
trepidation, pulled the right valve cover.  It was obvious that the #4 intake valve was bent; there was nearly a quarter inch
of lash between the rocker and the valve tip.  Then I put a breaker bar on the front of the engine, and it would only rotate
back and forth 180 degrees before hitting some kind of stop.

My Drag Week plans seemed to go up in smoke right there.  Given the piston to valve clearance issue I'd seen when pulling the
right head a few weeks earlier, I figured that somehow I had not sufficiently clearanced the piston.  I had test fit the head
on the engine prior to installation, with clay in the intake valve relief, and confirmed that I had clearance, but I figured
that somehow I had done something wrong, or something had changed, and that the valve had hit the piston, bent or broken, and
popped through the head casting into the water jacket.  Or, maybe the new valve springs just weren't sufficient to control the
valves, and I'd had a valve float issue where the valve hit the piston, with the same result. 
Everyone at the shop was really disappointed, and I began thinking about plan B for Drag Week, which was to bring the Mach 1
instead of the Shelby clone.  I had a weekends worth of work to do on the Mach 1 to get it ready, but it would still be good
to go in plenty of time.  I wasn't all fired up about bringing that car though; I had been working on my Shelby clone project
for a few years without any significant success, and I wanted to get the engine and car right finally, and prove it out at
Drag Week.  But given the situation, and not really knowing why the engine was having this problem, it didn't seem like a
viable option at this point.  I decided just to give myself a day to think about the best way to proceed, and went to bed
that night feeling as low as I'd been in quite a while.

Sunday morning July 19 I was back out to the shop, finishing up some intake manifold adapters for a few guys, and trying to get
the place cleaned up a little after the previous few weeks thrash.  The SOHC sat on the dyno, looking at me.  I hate that ;-) 
About 1:00 I just couldn't stand it any more; I had to know what the heck went wrong.  So, I decided to tear the engine down. 
First thing I did was remove the air bells from the throttle bodies.  This is what I saw:



I immediately knew what had happened.  Sharp eyes will spot the air cleaner stud present in the front throttle body, but
MISSING in the rear throttle body.  I was about 95% sure that the stud had come loose and gone down the #4 intake runner.  When
I pulled the top off the intake and looked down the runner with a flashlight, there was the stud, clamped in the intake valve.

Well, this was sure a freak accident.  I'd heard of this happening before, but had never experienced it myself.  Those studs
had been in the throttle bodies ever since I bought them, had multiple passes down the track, 50-60 pulls on the dyno, over
500 street miles, and were secured in place with a lock nut.  How the rear stud had decided to come loose now was beyond me. 
Nevertheless, it was my responsibility, and hindsight being 20/20 I should have pulled those studs out of the throttle bodies
before dynoing the engine. 

Funny thing was, at the same time I was feeling stupid, I was also very relieved.  This issue was not due to some unknown
problem with the engine.  It had been running fine, and making great power, before this happened.  Maybe I didn't have a piston
to valve contact issue, and maybe the valvesprings were not a problem.  Neither problem should have existed, based on the checks
I did while assembling the engine.  Knowing that it wasn't a fundamental problem, maybe I could still fix this thing...

I spent the rest of the day Sunday tearing the engine down.  When I pulled the right head, I didn't even want to look.  When I
did, it was as bad or worse than I thought:



In addition to the obvious carnage in the chamber, it was broken out into the water jacket on the end.  This is why the engine
was pouring water out of the #4 header tube.

The big question, though, was the bore.  If the cylinder bore got banged up, this engine was done for the year.  But upon
inspection I could barely believe how good it looked; it appeared to be in excellent shape, with the exception of one minor
scratch on the side!  The piston was totally banged up on top, but on close inspection it was clear there had been no piston
to valve contact where I had found it a few weeks before.  So, my clearancing of the piston top had been sufficient, and the
entire problem with the engine could be attributed to the air cleaner stud.

Sunday night I went into overdrive making plans to get the engine back together.  I called Blair and told him about the
problems, and asked him to call CP regarding a replacement piston, and Crower about a replacement rod, in case the #4 rod was
bent.  He promised to call them on Monday.  I made a list of all the parts I would need:  head gaskets (custom copper gaskets
are required for this engine), piston, rings(maybe), rod (maybe), valve seats (to be replaced after the head was weld repaired),
timing chain (I didn't want to reuse the long timing chain after the trauma in #4), and a few other small parts.  I had spare
valves, which was good because they are a 4 week lead time item.  I went to bed Sunday night thinking I might be able to recover
in some reasonable time frame with this engine.

Monday I got word from Blair that I could have a new piston from CP in one week if I was willing to pay an expedite fee, which
I was.  Crower, though, was a minimum 6 weeks for a new rod.  I hadn't yet pulled the oil pan and the #4 piston and rod out of
the engine, so I wasn't sure if I needed a rod yet.  Blair thought that the rod was probably OK, given that the engine had just
run for a few seconds, and at a fairly low speed, and that the air cleaner stud was hardware store type all-thread.  But I
needed to check it to be sure.  I also called the guy who could weld up the head, Buck at Crow Cast Welding, and he said he'd
be able to do it quickly.  On Monday night I got the right head taken apart in preparation for welding; both valves in #4 were
badly bent.

Tuesday after work I ran the head out to the welder.  He said it didn't look as bad as he thought it would (!!), and would get
working on it Wednesday morning.  That evening I pulled the oil pan, and took out the #4 piston and rod.  The top of the piston
was smashed down and squeezed the rings into their grooves, so for sure I was going to have to put new rings in #4.  But the rod
 bearing looked beautiful; all the graphite coating was still on all parts of the rod bearings, so it didn't look like the rod
had taken much of a hit. I removed the piston and pin from the rod, and the pin also looked good, sliding out of the piston and
the rod with no issues, and no sign of bending. 

Wednesday at lunch I ran the rod up to R&R to get it checked for straightness.  Bryan put it on the checking fixture and
- oh no - the rod WAS bent!  Most of the force on the piston would have been towards the back side of the bore, and this
apparently had been enough to tweak the pin end of the rod just a little.  Crap, and the rod was a long lead time item.  I
began to think of alternatives to a direct rod replacement.  I could use one of the standard Crower billet rods, but the
problem was that they were 50 grams lighter than the rods in the engine.  This would leave me with a balance problem.  I
might be able to compensate with a heavy pin, but it would have to be really heavy, and since the big end counts twice as
much as the small end when balancing the rod, the ability to do this might be dependent on the relative big end weights. 
Later Wednesday I talked to Blair about this, and had him order me the rings that I needed, plus discuss the rod balance
ituation.  None of the alternatives sounded good to me.  I went to bed on Wednesday night wondering if I'd be able to solve
this problem.

Thursday morning Blair texted me to give him a call right away.  As luck would have it, Blair had a rod on the shelf at his
place that was nearly the perfect fit.  It was the same style as my rods, and designed for a supercharged engine that was
expected to make 1300 horsepower, so it was nearly identical in weight to my rods.  For example, my rods weigh 652 grams on
the big end, and the rod Blair had weighed 650 grams.  It was about 10 grams lighter than mine on the small end, but it was
fitted with a bushing for a 0.990" pin, and my pins are 0.927", so rebushing the rod for the smaller pin would add a few grams
too.  Blair sent me the rod, and a bushing for R&R to press in, via overnight service.

Thursday afternoon Buck called me, and said the head was welded up already!  He had also machined the deck, and had only had
to remove about 0.005" to clean it up.  Thursday after work I ran out there to pick it up.  He did a really nice job, and it
looked great.  Then, Friday, when I got home from work, there was the new connecting rod.  Things were starting to come
together.

Over the weekend I was thinking ahead about the car.  I wanted to make sure that everything in the car was ready, so that after
the engine was installed the car would be ready to go.  When I'd built the new headers, one of the tubes needed to run right
where a roll cage support was located, from the upper right strut mount down to the frame.  I'd cut that out but not replaced
it yet, so I took care of that on Saturday. 

Then on Sunday, my friend Curt came over with his rigid hone, and we took a few swipes down the #4 cylinder bore, to get it
ready for the new rings.  One thing that the hone showed us was that the bore wasn't quite as pristine as I had originally
thought.  When the rod bent and cocked the piston a little in the bore, it looked like the bore took an impact in some spots. 
This was clear because the rigid hone didn't touch three small spots on the cylinder walls.  I talked with Blair about this and
he pointed out that we hadn't had a torque plate installed when we did the honing, and that may have straightened out the walls
a little, but in one spot for sure the wall took a hit and deformed somewhat.  I didn't feel that it was enough to cause a
running problem, and the imperfections were down a little from the top of the bore, but I figured I'd probably be down a little
on power in that cylinder.

Monday, I dropped the welded head and the connecting rod and bushing off at R&R.  Bryan needed to order seats for the #4
chamber, but he thought he could get them in a hurry, and have everything ready for me by Friday.  I still didn't have the new
piston yet, but I told him I'd bring it up just as soon as it came, so it could be pin fitted.

The rings came on Tuesday, the new chain came on Wednesday along with some of the other small parts, but the piston didn't come
until Thursday, after I got home from work.  So Friday I ran up to R&R at lunch to pick up the head and rod, and Bryan pin fit
the piston to the pin while I waited.  By Friday afternoon, the head was repaired, and the new piston and rod were in house and
ready to install.  It was remarkable to me that I had everything I needed to re-assemble the engine only 12 days after the
damage was done.

The weekend of August 1 and 2 I shelved all other projects in order to get the engine back together.  By Sunday night I had it
nearly finished, with only the oil pan and valvetrain left to install.  And once again, Scott was available the following
weekend to help dyno the engine.  It looked like I might yet recover and get this thing to Drag Week.

As I got the engine buttoned up and the weekend approached, doubts began to creep in about the project.  What if the crank had
been damaged during the failure?  The bearing journal looked good, and everybody who I'd talked to about Crower cranks had
convinced me that I didn't need to worry about it.  Plus it withstood a much more severe failure last year without any damage. 
But I hadn't checked it, so I was still a little nervous.  Or, what if the engine started leaking water again due to the
trauma?  All I needed was more water in the oil.  I tried to put those thoughts aside as I worked on finishing the assembly of
the engine; we would know quite a bit on Saturday.

At the end of the week I found out from Scott that he had been delayed working on another project, so he would not be able to
attend after all.  However, with some software called TeamViewer he would be able to work on the EFI system through an internet
connection to my laptop, from his place in Iowa.  That was the next best thing to him being there, so we got that set up and
working on Saturday morning.  It ended up taking me until around dinner time on Saturday to get the engine ready to run; most
of the extra time was spent getting the new set of headers assembled.  It seemed that they had been tweaked a little during the
coating operation, and didn't want to fit together as well as when I'd sent them off.  Finally though, around 5:30 on Saturday
we were ready.  The engine fired right up but immediately began puking a bunch of oil out of the dry sump breather.  I shut the
engine off immediately to have a look.  The oil appeared to have water in it.  Ruh-roh...

After draining the oil and water from the engine and dry sump system, and measuring the amount of oil that came out of the pan
and dry sump, it appeared that we had about a quart of water in the oil.  I'd had the water in the engine since about noon on
Saturday, with the electric pump running, so I surmised that there was a small internal water leak somewhere that was causing
the problem.  The plugs looked good and there was no water in the cylinders, so that was a relief.  I pressurized the cooling
system, and listening through the inspection cover opening on the SOHC front cover, I could hear a very, very faint hiss on
the right side.  Probably what had happened was that this leak had been dripping water into the engine for 4-5 hours, and we
didn't discover it until the engine fired.  At the end of the night Saturday, I pulled the cooling tower off the dyno stand
and installed the radiator and electric fans from the car, in preparation for some Moroso chemical sealant.

Sunday morning I fired the engine up with distilled water in the radiator, and after it warmed up I added the Moroso sealer. 
The engine ran fine for 25 minutes at operating temperature, idling around 1100 RPM and staying right around 165 degrees.  After
shut down, there was no evidence of water in the oil, so I felt pretty confident that the leak had sealed up.  I spent some time
lashing the valves while the engine was hot, and then checked the chain tension, before removing the radiator and electric fans
and replacing them with the dyno's cooling tower.  By about 2:00 PM I was ready to start running some dyno pulls.  Scott was
online with the EFI system, so we fired the engine up, warmed it to temperature, and then went into the first pull.  But the
engine sounded funny, and it was not behaving like it should.  I aborted the pull about halfway through and looked at the dyno
data while Scott perused the EFI logs.  The engine was running really rich, and was down on power by a tremendous amount.  What
the heck was going on now?  With the ignition off I hit the starter, and the engine sounded funny on the starter.  The way it
sounded was kind of like how these engines sound when a timing chain breaks.  That didn't make any sense though, because the
chain was new and I had just set the tension.  I went out into the dyno room and pulled the right hand inspection cover, and
sure enough, the chain looked fine.  Hmmmm...  I pulled the right valve cover, and everything looked good.  Everything under
the left valve cover looked good too.  Puzzled, I hit the starter again, just briefly, and the crank turned, but the cams didn't
move.  More bad news.

Next I looked into the opening from the valve cover down through the timing cover, to observe the primary timing chain.  When I
turned the crank by hand with a wrench, the crank moved, but the primary chain did not.  Was it possible I had stripped a gear,
or sheared the crank gear key?

I pulled the dry sump drive gear, front pulleys, crank sensor target, and the harmonic balancer.  When I pulled out the crank
sleeve I looked in through the hole, but all I could see was the oil slinger, which was still lined up properly with the
crankshaft key,  There was nothing to do but take the front cover off the engine for a better look.  Sure enough, when I
removed the front cover and then the oil slinger, the crank key had sheared:



I still don't know for sure why this happened, but most likely the key was seriously sheared during the air cleaner stud
incident, and the gear was jammed on the shaft until if finally spun free under the stress of the dyno pull. I had never
taken the oil slinger off the crank when repairing the engine over the previous few weeks, so if the key was damaged I would
have never seen it, and I didn't think to look. When I had timed the cams this time around, they had seemed a little off,
which made sense now with the sheared crank key.  The fact that the engine ran fine for 25 minutes at low RPM was remarkable;
the crank gear must have been stuck on the crank pretty hard to run that long without breaking loose.

The really bad news on this was that since this happened with the engine running, there was virtually no doubt that some
valves had hit the pistons and bent.  I did a couple leakdown checks on both sides of the engine, and one cylinder showed
40% leakdown, but the other three looked OK.  That was actually quite surprising, but I decided I had to pull the heads and
check everything out anyway.  I spent the rest of the day and into the evening Sunday tearing down the engine - again.  There
was evidence of exhaust valve to piston contact on every piston, and intake valve contact on most of them. 



Also, the number 2 cylinder rockers were both stuck on the rocker shaft, and the number 7 exhaust rocker was also stuck. 
Probably bent, and mishapen so that the rocker shaft hole was out of round on those rockers.

The only good news was that I had extra valves, and extra rockers, and I could fix this myself without having to wait for anyone
else.  My schedule for making it to the track on August 22 was probably out the window, but I could still be ready for Drag Week
if I got the engine back together quickly.  My pal Steve (57 Lima Bean on the forum), who is with me at Drag Week this year,
volunteered to come out a couple of nights during the week and help with the gasket scraping and re-assembly.  By this time I
was really, really sick and tired of scraping gaskets and cleaning sealing surfaces on this engine, so his help was very
welcome. 

After pulling the heads, I set them on the bench and did my normal check of the valve seal.  I do this with every new set of
heads that comes back from the machine shop, just to check the work.  What this involves is filling the ports, one side at a
time, with isopropyl alcohol, and seeing if the fluid leaks past the valve and seat.  If you have a poor valve job, you will
get some seepage there within 15 minutes or so (I once received a set of finished, CNC'd heads from a well known engine builder
that leaked like a sieve during this test).  I was expecting to see a bunch of leaky valves, but was surprised to find that
despite the marks on the pistons, none of the ports leaked any alcohol!  Relieved, and thinking that I had lucked out and not
bent any valves, I pulled off the valve springs to inspect all the components.  All the valves moved freely in the guides, so
that was also good news.  However, in most cases where the valve had hit the piston, the valve locks were scarred up where
they contacted the valve.  I ended up replacing 11 sets of the valve locks with new ones (again, lucky I had the spares). 
The three rockers were damaged for sure, and it seems that they took the brunt of the impact; two out of the three had the
roller end bent.  See the picture below, with the good rocker on top, and the bent rocker on the bottom:



When I had pulled the crank gear off the crank, I had watched two small shards of the crank key drop into the oil pan and
through the windage tray.  I'd spent an hour trying to fish them out with a magnet and some bent up welding rod, and got one,
but the other was still in there, so I'd had to take the oil pan off.  As long as it was off, I took the opportunity to pull
the rod cap on the #4 rod, which was the one that I'd replaced earlier, and check out the bearing.  Thankfully, it looked
perfect, so I reinstalled the rod cap and torqued the bolts. 

Steve was over on Tuesday night and between the two of us we got the block and the heads cleaned off and ready for installation
of the heads.  Wednesday evening I installed the left cylinder head.  Installing the heads on this engine is a long, drawn out
process, because of the copper head gaskets and the need for sealer, and also because of the process I go through to try to
extend the life of the copper head gaskets.  This is a process that Mike LeFevers (who was at Shelby and contributed to the
original Shelby block design) described to me years ago, to make copper head gaskets live on the street.  It involves putting
little circles of nylon thread around all the water jacket openings in the block and heads, which act as O-rings and improve
the seal when the copper gaskets starts work hardening and flexing after multiple heat cycles.  I've been doing this on this
engine since I originally built it in 2007, and I've never had a copper head gasket fail.

While I was installing the left head, I missed a phone call from my friend Kurt.  He left me a message, which I got late that
evening, which said in effect that he had spoken to Bryan at R&R, and Bryan had said that often a valve spring that is strong
on the seat will pull a bent valve shut.  If that was the case, then my isopropyl test was not valid.  Crap!  If that turned
out to be the case, I'd have to pull the left head that I'd just installed. 

Thursday night in the shop I decided to remove all the valves in the right head and check them in my lathe with a dial
indicator.  I found four bent exhausts, and one bent intake.  They weren't bent by much, between .005" and .020" runout, but
I wasn't going to leave them in there like that.  Resigned to the fact that the left head had to come back off, I pulled it and
then checked its valves, and also got 4 bent exhausts.  I rounded up my collection of spare valves and only had 5 exhausts that
were ready to install, but I did have some others with a slightly larger head diameter that could be cut down.

I had taken Friday off to get my NHRA mandated physical for my NHRA driver's license, so before I went in for that I dropped the
valves off at R&R so Bryan could cut them down.  While I was there he showed me a BBC head that had come in with bent valves. 
With the springs on the valves, they were perfectly sealed, but when the springs were removed you could twirl the valves in
the guides and see at least 0.100" of runout!  Those valves were badly bent, and still the spring bent them back to seal.  The
issue here is that the spring is bending the valve on every cycle, and at some point the valve will fail at the stem and the
head will come off.  Ron, the dyno guy at R&R, was also really surprised by this result, but Bryan said he had seen it many
times before.  (This behavior calls into question the value of a leakdown test; unless the valve is bent so much that the spring
can't close it, you would never detect a bent valve, and the leakdown check is only going to give you the condition of the
rings.  You'd have to put checker springs on the valves in order to get an indication if they were bent.  And then why, four
weeks earlier when I had done the leakdown on #5, did I see a 70% leakdown number??  That exhaust valve was not badly bent. 
After replacing the valve and reinstallation of the head, leakdown checked fine.  More mysteries...)

After my physical I picked up the valves at R&R and went back to the shop.  I spent the rest of the day on Friday reassembling
the heads with the new valves. and getting them installed on the engine.  On Saturday Steve and Kurt were over to help me get
the engine assembled, which on these motors is no mean feat, but by 7:00 PM on Saturday the front cover and timing setup were
installed, and the oil pan was back on.  Saturday night and into Sunday I got the rest of the engine put together, and by 4:00
PM Sunday was ready to run again, only one week after the latest disaster.  The engine fired right up and ran fine, albeit
with a fairly high idle.  I let it warm up for 15 minutes then shut it down and adjusted the chain tension and lashed all
the valves.  The moment of truth was at hand.  I ran the first pull from 4000-6000 RPM and the engine sounded a little off,
although it didn't sound like it was missing.  I checked the dyno data and it was down 150 HP from where it had been before. 
But then I looked at the exhaust temp data, and it was obvious that #2 wasn't firing.  This was not at all obvious from the
way the engine sounded, and just reinforced my opinion that the results from the original "steaming pile" dyno session in 2011
were due to a dead hole.

I traced the problem to one of the wires feeding the #2 coil, which had fallen down on the headers and burned through.  I
fixed this issue and ran one more 4000-6000 RPM pull, and I was relieved to see that the engine was right back where it started,
making 920 HP at 6000 RPM.  It also had picked up power all across the RPM range, up to 15 HP at 5500 RPM, and was running much
leaner than it had before.  This was probably attributable to the headers; if they were scavenging the exhaust more efficiently,
more fuel would be required.  Also, the smaller primary pipes probably helped at the lower engine speeds.  I felt that this
result was very positive, and that the engine would be up on power when the A/F was dialed in.

I called it a night at that point, and lined up Scott for a remote tuning session the next night.  Seemed like the first time
in a month that I'd had a good night's sleep!

The next night (Monday), turned out Scott wasn't available after all, so I ran the tests myself.  Everything looked good as I
crept cautiously up the RPM range, until I tried a 5100-7100 RPM pull.  The engine peaked at 992 HP at 6900 RPM, but then fell
off rapidly at 7100; dyno chart below:



When I see a HP curve like this, I always suspect a valvetrain issue.  I didn't want to run the engine any more like this, so I
called it a night on the dyno and began investigating the valvesprings.  Last year, with the Comp 26115 springs, same cams, and
same heads, the engine ran to 7500 making the peak power level all the way.  I had replaced the valvesprings from last year
after the first dyno session with PAC springs that had the same seat pressure and just slightly less open pressure (about
20 pounds), at least according to the manufacturers data.  The PAC springs and retainer combination were also significantly
lighter, so I figured that would compensate for the lower open pressure.  And I liked the idea of a little less spring pressure,
 thinking of the stress on the long timing chain.

When I first got the PAC springs I measured them on my valve spring tester, and they measured quite a bit lower than the
catalog said they should.  But I have a cheap valve spring checker, so I took a couple of the springs into R&R and had Bryan
 measure them, and they were right on.  So, my valve spring checker measures a little low.  Tuesday night I took a spare PAC
spring and a spare Comp spring and measured them on my spring checker, and was surprised to see that the Comp spring measured
quite a bit higher, 255 vs 220 for the PAC on the seat, and 630 vs 560 over the nose.  The conclusion I came to was that Comp's
published specs for these springs were really conservative, and the extra spring pressure of the Comp springs was allowing the
engine to rev higher.  I got on Summit's web site and ordered a new set of Comp springs for delivery on Wednesday.

Wednesday and Thursday nights I installed the new valvesprings, and re-assembled the engine on Friday night so it was ready to
run.  After the engine was back together Friday night it was already 8:00 (past dyno time), so I stayed up and wrote a CNC
program for a plastic 1" plenum spacer for my sheet metal intake.  I was still worried about the "W" shape of the plenum and
how that might affect power production, and thought that the spacer might help with that.

Saturday August 22 was finally a good day on the dyno.  I had some help from my friends Steve and Kurt, and we managed to run
quite a few tests on the engine with various components.  Here is what we found:

-  The new valvesprings did not appear to make a major change to the engine's power band, but they seemed to flatten the HP
curve out just a little.  But in any case, at 7100 RPM, power starts decreasing on this engine.  At this point it was clear
that the power drop-off was intake manifold related, because that was really the only significant change from last year.  The
old steaming pile intake had runner lengths tuned for a much higher engine speed (8500 RPM), while the new intake had runner
lengths tuned for 7000 RPM.  It seemed that the old intake manifold held the engine up in the higher RPM ranges, at the cost
of power in the 5500-7000 RPM range.  Peak power, and average power across the band of interest was much better for the new
intake, despite the fall off at the top end, so that was the intake that was staying on the engine.

-  No matter what we did, the engine peaked at 992 HP, and would not budge 1 HP higher than that.  Either the cams or the heads
are limiting the power production at that level.  I've never cheated my dyno data, but I have to admit I was tempted to add 1%
to the numbers and claim 1000 HP LOL!

- The 1" plenum spacer made no difference in power, anywhere in the RPM range.  This was a surprise; we were all betting that
the plenum spacer would offer an improvement.  But the HP and torque curves with and without the spacer were right on top of
each other.  This was actually good, because without the spacer I had more hood clearance in the car.

-  I ran the initial tests with the larger header collector; this collector had a 4" outlet and a 2-3/4" choke.  When we
switched to the smaller header collector (3-1/2" outlet, 2-1/2" choke) the engine made identical power up to 7000 RPM, but
improved slightly by 5-7 HP up to 7300 RPM.  This was counter-intuitive to me, but the dyno results were clear.  This pick-up
of the power curve at the top end also made the power drop-off less dramatic, and HP curve was starting to look a little more
normal.

-  The last test we ran was with header extensions.  We ran these tests with the exhaust system on the dyno disconnected from
the engine, allowing the exhaust to fill the dyno room and be evacuated by the fan at the end of the room; I wanted to get a
true picture of  the sonic tuning effects of the header changes.  First, I added 12" collector extensions to both collectors,
and observed no change in power.  But I had painted a stripe of yellow paint on the extension, to look for the change in color,
so I could cut the collector extensions off there.  I had previously run this engine's specs through Pipemax, and Pipemax said
that the length of the collector from the choke to the end should be about 17".  When I checked the length of the collector
from the choke back to the end of the burn marks, I got about 17-1/2".  So, I cut the collector extensions off there, and with
the shortened collector extensions the engine again picked up a little more power from 7000-7300, with no loss at the lower
speed ranges.  So despite the fact that the Pipemax recommendations for primary pipe diameter were way, way too big, at least
the collector length recommendation was right on, and also consistent with the old racer's trick of cutting the extensions off
at the burn mark.  And again, this increase at the top end helped flatten out the HP curve somewhat, making it appear more
normal.

Here's a plot of the best dyno pull from this year's engine (in black), compared with the one from last year (in red):



Looking at this data I decided I'd better gear the car down a little, maybe from 4.56 to 4.29, to take advantage of the lower
power band.  This was also going to be easier on the engine, shifting at 7200 instead of 7500, so that was a plus.

We were done on the dyno by 2:30, and Steve and Kurt hung around to help me get the engine off the dyno and into the car by
7:00 PM or so.  Later that evening after they'd gone, I got the engine and trans bolted down on the mounts and started the
hookup.  My pal JC came over on Sunday to help, and by the end of the night Sunday the dry sump system was installed, the
front suspension was back in the car, the headers were assembled and installed, and the radiator was installed and hooked up. 
There was a test and tune the next Saturday on the 29th, and I was going to do my best to make it there.  What I really needed
at this point was some track time on the car.

All week I burned the midnight oil getting the car put back together.  Got it fired and the hood installed on Thursday night,
and was looking forward to a test drive (and car wash) on Friday night, prior to loading the car on the trailer.  But things
didn't go as planned during the day on Friday.  I had been waiting all week for an email from NHRA with my new driver's license
attached.  I had filled out the form and had the physical at the beginning of August, but they had mailed it back to me because
my doctor had not filled in all the form properly.  I'd run it back over to him, had the corrections made, and sent it back,
but still not heard back from NHRA.  Tuesday I'd called, and gotten a very rude woman who wouldn't let me talk without
interrupting me to explain how busy she was.  Finally she said she had my application and would get the email with my
license sent out by the end of the week.  Friday afternoon arrived and I still didn't have an email, so I called back, only
to find out that the NHRA Division 5 office closes at noon on Friday!  No driver's licen

156
Drag Week 2015 / This year's Drag Week Cars
« on: August 30, 2015, 08:14:38 PM »
This afternoon my friend Kevin (thatdarncat) came by with his Drag Week car for the year and we took a cruise together.  I got some good pictures, so I thought I'd use this as an excuse to start up the Drag Week board a little early this year.  Kevin is actually still on the waiting list for the event, but he's right near the top, so its a lock that he'll get in.  He's bringing his 67 Shelby to the event; to me, it is really cool that he races an original Shelby, and he is going to take it to Drag Week this year too.  Here are some pictures of his car:







For my part, I'm going with the same car as last year, my 69 Shelby clone.  It has given me fits all summer long, which I will detail in a long post right before the start of the event, but it looks now like I'm going to make it with the car, so I don't need to fall back to my 69 Mach 1.  Here are a couple pictures of this car:






I'd say they look pretty good together  ;D



The Cobra mural on the hood of Kevin's car is original from the 1970s, according to Kevin.  He has owned the car for about 30 years.

We have both been trying to get some shakedown miles on our cars, so when Kevin came over I called my old trunk monkey Captain Stabbin' (HemiJoel on the forum), and he was naturally in the shop working on his cars, so Kevin and I took off for Joel's place about 20 miles away.  Joel has been trying to get two cars ready for some events at the end of the summer, his '30s Plymouth for the hot rod class in Drag Week, and his 1929 Duesenberg, for the Duesenberg drag race on Labor Day weekend.  Unfortunately for Joel, he hasn't been able to get the projects finished in time, and so he'll be skipping the Duesenberg race, and is planning on bringing his 1967 Hemi GTX convertible to Drag Week.  According to Joel the GTX convertible is only one of 17 built in 67 with the Hemi, so it is an extremely rare car, and just like with Kevin's Shelby, I'm impressed that Joel is going to take that car down the track at Drag Week.  It probably won't be very fast, but it WILL be very cool.

Another reason that I wanted to get over to see Joel is that his Duesenberg engine is still apart.  I was very interested in seeing the guts of that thing.  For those who are not familiar with them, this is a double overhead cam, 4 valve per cylinder, hemispherical combustion chamber straight 8, 420 cubic inches, and built new in 1929!  It sounded super cool, so I was looking forward to the visit.

This is the sight that greeted us inside Joel's garage:



Man, that is one Looooong engine compartment!  After showing us the car, Joel took us over to see the cylinder head next.  Here's a few pictures of the head, cast in 1929.  The lifters look like a bucket that goes over the valve springs; you can see one installed over the valve and spring in the far bank in the middle of the first photo:









Unbelievable technology for the day, and you wonder why it took Detroit another 60 years to come up with something similar.  I guess pushrods are cheaper  ::)  Anyway, next Joel showed us the short block, which is now assembled:





That's Joel's Drag Week car, the 67 Hemi GTX, in the background of the second picture. (It's too bad it has one of those oily, smelly, greasy, fluid couplings in it, instead of a 4 speed ;))  In the Duesenberg short block, those are some real domed pistons, perfectly hemispherical on top with no valve reliefs.  They are aftermarket, because the engine originally came with only 5:1 compression, due to the fuel available back in the day.  According to Joel the original pistons were flat tops.  And how about that 4 row timing chain!  A two row chain is a duplex chain, so this must be a quadruplex chain setup.  In addition to the pistons, Joel also replaced the factory connecting rods with Carillo rods.  Some pictures of the original parts are shown below; in the first picture the rod babbit is chipping away, which is why Joel took the engine apart to rebuild it this year:







Aluminum rods in 1929!  Unbelievable.  The pistons are a unique design that thermally separate the piston skirts from the ringed portion of the pistons at the top.  According to Joel, this allowed Duesenberg to run very tight clearances on the piston skirts, to eliminate noise and scuffing.  Joel is a veritable fountain of information on these engines, and he is using the opportunity of rebuilding his to write a book about them.

Next Joel flipped the engine over on his custom made engine stand (modified just for this project) so we could see the bottom end.  Notice that some of the main caps are 4 bolt, and you can see the Carillo rods here.  They are much, much heavier than the original factory aluminum rods, so Joel will have to keep the revs down on this motor  ;D





The picture above shows a couple of innovations on this engine.  There is a float around the oil pump so that the oil level can be read with a mechanical rod that is attached to the float and comes through the block, so you can check your oil level without using a dipstick.  Also, that can that is attached to the crank is apparently a patented Duesenberg invention.  According to Joel, it contains mercury, and along with a matching can on the other side of the crank, it balances the engine.  Kind of like a Fluidampr is supposed to work. 

And look at the size of the oil pan in the picture below!  It is complete with a windage tray and a round seal that fits around the oil pump, so that the oil has to scavenge through the slots in the windage tray before it gets picked back up by the pump.



I have to say I came away mighty impressed by this engine, and its too bad that Joel didn't get it back together in time for the Duesenberg drag race next weekend.  I'll bet he'll make it next year, though. 

Kevin and I had an uneventful trip back to my place after the visit with Joel.  An uneventful drive is always good in your Drag Week car LOL!  Drag Week registration is two weeks from today.  I think we are all getting pretty excited...

157
FE Technical Forum / Guess the Classic FE Race Car
« on: August 07, 2015, 12:02:45 PM »
Tom M sent me these pictures, and says this is a classic FE race car in the process of being reborn.  Any guesses on which one it is?  Pictures are from a cell phone camera, so they're not that great, but you'll get the idea.  There's a drawing at the end showing what the powerplant install will look like.












158
FE Technical Forum / Interesting pictures from Tom M...
« on: July 15, 2015, 03:34:43 PM »
Tom forwarded these pictures for me to post.  Some of them are kind of blurry, but you get the general drift of what's going on.  I like the Holman Moody dyno data, and what looks like some kind of a magneto, plus the SOHC stuff.  Tom has promised to come on and give a description of what we're looking at here...




















159
Private Classifieds / What's the value of a 1969 Torino Cobra?
« on: June 18, 2015, 09:02:26 PM »
I had a guy offer to sell me his car tonight.  It is an original Torino Cobra, but the original 428 is gone, replaced by a 390.  The original 4 speed and 9" (3.91 traction lok) are still in the car.  It runs and drives, was an original red car, has some rust issues he says, but not terrible or anything.  I forgot to ask if it is a notchback or a fastback  ::), but I'd probably be interested in it either way.  He has the Marti report for the car. 

I don't really know what these things go for.  Any suggestions on a fair price?  Also, are patch panels and replacement parts readily available for these cars, like they are for Mustangs?  Thanks - Jay

160
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Age of Forum Members
« on: June 11, 2015, 10:24:38 AM »
Felony's Conundrum post, and the associated age admissions, got me to thinking about the average age of our forum members.  Generally speaking us FE folks are older than the hot rodding public in general, but I'm curious about just how "long in the tooth" we all really are.  Click the buttons in the poll to vote.  You have to vote to see the results.

161
FE Technical Forum / Who can decode this rear end tag for me?
« on: June 02, 2015, 10:35:34 PM »
This is from the 8" rearend that came out of my 68 Mustang.  I thought it was just more junkyard scrap, but then yesterday when I was moving it around I noticed that when I turned the pinion, both axles moved - in the same direction!  Could this thing have a Traction Lok in it?  I know less than nothing about 8" rear ends, so any insight is appreciated.  The tag reads:

WCZ-V1
2.79 7GC 930

A small block Mustang with 2.79 gears!  No wonder the car was a dog...

162
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Royce B and Barry R Make Engine Masters!
« on: May 26, 2015, 11:10:45 PM »
Our own forum member Royce has been accepted at Engine Masters, with his Lincoln engine.  He'll be going toe to toe with the Y-blocks from Kaase and Mummert, some old poly combustion chamber Mopars, and whatever other old school stuff shows up.  Attaboy Royce!  Let's hear some details on that Lincoln engine!

Also, my Y-block pal JC is first alternate for the class!  He has a good chance of making the show, and is planning on borrowing my Weber carbs for his Y-block effort.  (As a result, he has been very nice to me lately ;D ;D)

I was also told by JC that the LS engine class still has two open spots to fill.  Maybe there's room for an FE in that class  ::)

I wonder if Barry R made it in...

Edit:  Thanks for the update, glad to hear that Barry made it in too.  Barry, anything new for this year?

163
Member Projects / 68 Mustang Memorial Day Weekend Thrash
« on: May 22, 2015, 12:45:35 PM »
Seems like every year I end up with a major project over the Memorial Day weekend.  This year is no different, and in fact several months ago I decided that this was the weekend I was going to revamp my 68 Mustang fastback.  I've owned this car for about 10 years now, and never really done anything with it.  My first car, back in 1976, was a 67 Mustang fastback with the deluxe interior, 289 and automatic.  I bought my 68 Shelby convertible in 1978, and always regretted that I had to sell the 67 fastback to be able to afford the Shelby.  So, I bought the 68 fastback as kind of a replacement for my first Mustang.  Shortly after I bought it I acquired all the parts necessary to convert the interior to the 67 deluxe interior that I liked so much way back when, and its been sitting this way ever since.

Here's some pictures of the car as it sat in my driveway today:








Right now this car has several problems.  The major one is, that being an FE guy, I can't stand the small block that is in there.  I'm used to the effortless acceleration of the FE, and this engine labors mightily under acceleration despite its headers, aftermarket intake, and Holley double pumper.  Small blocks are for punks!  This thing has GOT to go:



I also have some issues with the electrical and charging system in the car, and the engine is now leaking a little antifreeze from the bypass hose, the carb needs to be rebuilt, the brakes (4 wheel drum) suck, and so does the suspension. 

So, over the last few years I've been collecting parts to do a wholesale drivetrain, suspension, and brake swap in this car.  I took today off work so I had a four day weekend to accomplish as much of this as I could, and I started out by putting all the parts I'm planning to use in one area:



The engine is my old reliable 428CJ dyno mule, which makes around 440 horsepower on the dyno with the Edelbrock Torker intake and Holley 750 double pumper carb.  Two years ago I picked up the T56 Magnum 6 speed transmission and installation kit from American Powertrain, and I'm planning to do whatever is necessary to get that combination installed in the car.  This part is going to be new to me, because I'll have to convert the clutch pedal to a hydraulic one, and use the hydraulic throwout bearing that came with the kit.  Plus, I'm figuring some floor modifications may be required.  But I'm looking forward to the overdrive gears in the transmission, and the smooth shifting that these things are noted for.

Also visible is a 57 Ford rear axle housing, an N-case with 4.11 gears and a Detroit locker, and the Mark Williams Masterline axles I had in my Mach 1 back in 2004 and 2005; these are going to have to be cut back a little because the 57 Ford axle housing is slightly narrower than the stock Mustang axle housing.  I'll also need to cut off the spring perches and weld on some new ones I got from Currie, to fit the leaf spring position in the Mustang.  I also have all new front suspension components, including upper and lower control arms, all the tie rod end pieces, and a 1" front sway bar.  Finally, there is a complete 4 wheel disc brake package from Wilwood for the car, including the master cylinder.

I'm still waffling on the rear suspension pieces; I'm really tempted to go with the Cal-Tracs and monoleaf springs again, because they work so well on my Mach 1, but I think I want to drive the car with the stock rear suspension in it first before I make that decision.  This is not going to be a track car, pretty much daily driver street duty in the summer, so if I can tame the wheel hop with some cheap traction bars I might just leave it as is.  We'll see after I drive it for a while.

I'll post updates throughout the weekend as I get going on this project.  I'm hoping to have all the parts installed by the end of the day Monday; I will still need to get a driveshaft and screw around with the electrical system, finish all the details, etc., but if I can get that all accomplished the heavy lifting will be done, and I can kind of tinker with the car over the next couple weeks to get it running and driving correctly. 

I may be asking questions about the T56 install, so if anybody has any advice for me on that, I'd love to hear it - Jay

164
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Street Outlaws
« on: May 18, 2015, 07:53:53 PM »
Just sitting down to watch the season premier, 2 hour episode.  Anybody else hooked on this show?  I love it that there's a TV show that speaks the drag racer's language...

165
Performance Summary:
      1/4 mile ET:   10.55            1/4 mile MPH:   129
      1/8 mile ET:                        1/8 mile MPH:
      60 foot time:
      Track:         Gateway International Raceway, St. Louis area
      Weather Conditions:    Hot!

Vehicle Specifications:

Model Year:  1969

Model:  Mustang

Style:  Mach 1

Engine Details (link to post in Dyno Results board if available:
http://fepower.net/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=2675.0

Transmission:  Performance Automatics C4, full reverse manual valve body with trans brake (brake not used), Gear Vendors overdrive

Torque converter details (if automatic):  Neil Chance 10" converter, "almost" locked at 2500 RPM for good street performance, fully locked at 4000 RPM for drag use

Clutch details (if manual):  NA

Driveshaft:  Mark Williams chrome moly drive shaft

U-joints:  Mark Williams 1350 U-Joints

Rear end type:  Ford 9", factory housing with reinforced spring perches, Mark Williams aluminum center section, aluminum pinion support

Differential type:  Detroit locker, old style that clicks around corners

Gear Ratio:  4.11

Axles:  Mark Williams Masterline 31 spline

Front tires:  225-60/15 Goodyear street tires

Front wheels:  Magnum 500 15X7

Rear tires:  Mickey Thompson 9.0 X 28.0 ET Drag Tires

Rear wheels:  Magnum 500 15X8

Front suspension information:  Small block front springs (one coil cut off to lower front end), front sway bar removed, Competition Engineering 90/10 shocks, rollerized spring perches

Rear suspension information:  Cal-Trac traction bars set in lower hole, 1/2 turn preload on driver's side, monoleaf springs, Rancho shocks

Ready-to-race vehicle weight, including driver:  3600 pounds

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 25