FE Power Forums

FE Power Forums => FE Technical Forum => Topic started by: gregaba on December 20, 2020, 11:06:48 AM

Title: Cam King
Post by: gregaba on December 20, 2020, 11:06:48 AM
Has anybody used the Cam Research Cam King break in service?
I watched their video and it looks like it would work good.
To me it would be worth the $100 and shipping not to have to spend the couple of hours changing out my valve springs after break in.
Greg
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: e philpott on December 20, 2020, 11:20:25 AM
There’s no guarantee that the lifter bores are in the exact spot that yours are , my guess is the success rate is probably not any better than taking the time to break in right . Comp can nitrate the cam surface for a better chance of break in for an additional price that might be worth it
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: Joe-JDC on December 20, 2020, 12:00:43 PM
Are we talking about Mike Jones's camshafts?  His avatar on Speed Talk is Cam King.  Joe-JDC
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: blykins on December 20, 2020, 12:06:44 PM
It's not guaranteed that it will work and I've heard of guys wiping cams after this has been done.   As Eric mentioned, the lifter bores are not in the same spot from block to block, as well as some other variables that will be against you.

Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: rcodecj on December 20, 2020, 12:25:34 PM
I used a Cam Research cam with the lifters broken in. I broke in the cam at fast idle, etc just the same.
I had no problems with the cam.
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: gregaba on December 20, 2020, 02:19:14 PM
The owners name is Scott Main. I have done business with him off and on for the past 10 years and have been satisfied with his products.
Looks like I will be changing the springs out and I can't tell you how much I love to do this with the engine in the car, at least I have more room to work in the 63 verses the 71 429 Ranchero.
Greg
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: Joe-JDC on December 20, 2020, 02:29:31 PM
Scott builds a mean Cleveland SBF.  Met him at the EMC when he won in 2018.  Easy to talk with.  Seems to be genuine and likes all things Ford.  Joe-JDC
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: 427John on December 21, 2020, 04:01:17 AM
Isn't he the guy that originated the tongue plates for cleveland exhaust ports years ago?
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: fomocoloco on December 21, 2020, 08:41:44 AM
after losing three i opted for his cam recommendation and break in service. worked flawlessly. the next time i used him again. i have learned that you have to make sure those lifter bores are scrubbed and brushed and verify they drop in with no hickeys or force necessary. it sucks to do it more than once. even on a test stand.

jim
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: machoneman on December 21, 2020, 09:11:30 AM
after losing three i opted for his cam recommendation and break in service. worked flawlessly. the next time i used him again. i have learned that you have to make sure those lifter bores are scrubbed and brushed and verify they drop in with no hickeys or force necessary. it sucks to do it more than once. even on a test stand.

jim

Yes, I agree on the lifter bore issues. Too often, folks plug in a new set of lifters (cam swap) but fail to note the condition of the lifter bores. They must be clean of all crud, buildup, etc. to rotate properly. Oddly, it's easy to check by merely plugging in a lifter in each bore and see if it spins easily (emphasis on easy btw!). Since especially FE's are so darned old now and often in very high mileage condition, the buildup of crud alone may have been the reason some lose a cam lobe or two and then wonder why.   
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: fe-starliner on December 21, 2020, 10:13:19 AM
To the original poster.  I've used the break in service offered by Cam Research three times in the last 10 or so years.  All three of my FE engines have cams broken in by Scott Main at Cam Research and my youngest son's 408 small block had the same service on his race engine before he went to a roller cam.  What my son and I did was use the break in service offered and then when we installed our cams we did a normal engine break in period just as if we had not already had the cams broken in.  I agree with those above who say the lifter bores may not be in the exact position, but maybe I've just been lucky.  I've had no problems with the cams I've had done.  Same for my youngest son.  I just had Cam Research break in the cam for my 352 about six months ago.  Again so far no problems.  I wouldn't hesitate to use their service again.
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: gregaba on December 21, 2020, 10:52:18 AM
I want to thank everyone for their comments and experience's with Scott and his break in service.
Glad to see that everyone has had a good experience with his service.
Being the type of person that has a hard time making up his mind I have decided to go ahead and send him my cam and lifters after the new year. and then go and and break it in as normal.
I was planing on building a break in run stand last year but my shop is so full I could not find anywhere to put it and since I don't build as many engines as I used to decided not to build one.
One thing that was a concern with my block was the lifter bores after the engine sat in my shop for the last 15 years. They were really rough so I had Charles pay attention and redo them. Now they are like new.
Assembled the new rods and pistons yesterday and would really like to get the bottom end together before Christmas but guess I will have to wait until the cam comes back.
Greg
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: KsHighboy on December 21, 2020, 11:46:38 AM
I have one of Scotts cams in my 390 in my 67 Highboy. Its been in there probably 15yrs.  When I talked to Scott he recommended the break in machine since it was a pretty aggressive lobe and said it could beat down a lifter. So, I had him put it on the machine. It was $60 back then. After a few weeks of running the engine I started having lifter noise upon start up. I believe its only one, maybe 2 lifters. They quiet down after a few seconds so I've never replaced them.  Once in a while one will really tick upon start and it will hammer for a while. I have talked to Scott about it and he said it could have been the aggressive ramps on the cam but I just never have replaced them.
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: gregaba on December 21, 2020, 12:05:08 PM
Thats nice to know.
 That would drive me nuts. I don't believe I have to worry as everyone on the forum tells me my lobes aren't very aggressive.
I just want to have some insurance and lower my chances of a bad lobe or lifter.
I have never had a cam problem but with the new oils it has me a little worried as I have run out of my old oil from 25 years ago.
Greg
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: gt350hr on December 21, 2020, 12:30:41 PM
I have one of Scotts cams in my 390 in my 67 Highboy. Its been in there probably 15yrs.  When I talked to Scott he recommended the break in machine since it was a pretty aggressive lobe and said it could beat down a lifter. So, I had him put it on the machine. It was $60 back then. After a few weeks of running the engine I started having lifter noise upon start up. I believe its only one, maybe 2 lifters. They quiet down after a few seconds so I've never replaced them.  Once in a while one will really tick upon start and it will hammer for a while. I have talked to Scott about it and he said it could have been the aggressive ramps on the cam but I just never have replaced them.
    Valve spring pressure on an "open" valve with the engine not running "can" cause a lifter to "bleed down" . The will "tick" a bit upon restart. This is normal. Th eimportant thing is to NOT rev the engine excessively when the noise is there. Increasing lobe taper ensures lifter rotation  and has virtually eliminated flat lobes even with "lower" zinc content oils.
   Randy
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: My427stang on December 21, 2020, 12:42:32 PM
I have one of Scotts cams in my 390 in my 67 Highboy. Its been in there probably 15yrs.  When I talked to Scott he recommended the break in machine since it was a pretty aggressive lobe and said it could beat down a lifter. So, I had him put it on the machine. It was $60 back then. After a few weeks of running the engine I started having lifter noise upon start up. I believe its only one, maybe 2 lifters. They quiet down after a few seconds so I've never replaced them.  Once in a while one will really tick upon start and it will hammer for a while. I have talked to Scott about it and he said it could have been the aggressive ramps on the cam but I just never have replaced them.

There are certainly noisy lobes, XE series Comp and many of their Modern Muscle grinds are so noisy they advertise to sound like solids, but that wouldn't come and go.  I am certainly not trying to say you have to fix it, but likely is internal to the lifter, potentially a lifter bore up near its max size, or a preload issue.
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: blykins on December 21, 2020, 01:09:29 PM
I have one of Scotts cams in my 390 in my 67 Highboy. Its been in there probably 15yrs.  When I talked to Scott he recommended the break in machine since it was a pretty aggressive lobe and said it could beat down a lifter. So, I had him put it on the machine. It was $60 back then. After a few weeks of running the engine I started having lifter noise upon start up. I believe its only one, maybe 2 lifters. They quiet down after a few seconds so I've never replaced them.  Once in a while one will really tick upon start and it will hammer for a while. I have talked to Scott about it and he said it could have been the aggressive ramps on the cam but I just never have replaced them.
    Valve spring pressure on an "open" valve with the engine not running "can" cause a lifter to "bleed down" . The will "tick" a bit upon restart. This is normal. Th eimportant thing is to NOT rev the engine excessively when the noise is there. Increasing lobe taper ensures lifter rotation  and has virtually eliminated flat lobes even with "lower" zinc content oils.
   Randy

Bingo.  When I have flat tappets ground, I have an extra degree of lobe taper ground in.  In addition, I always use or recommend an oiling lifter, such as a Crower EDM or a Crower Cam Saver. 

To Greg, I'd make sure I had good lifters, such as the Crowers, make sure the spring pressures are around 100/280, use a Penngrade break-in oil, and let her fly.  I think it would be better to spend the labor/shipping money on good lifters and let her fly yourself. 
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: KsHighboy on December 21, 2020, 01:10:06 PM
Ross, I thought of pre load myself. I have re set the pre load a couple times and the tick persist. I have just figured its a lifter that is not holding after it sits.
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: gt350hr on December 21, 2020, 01:43:08 PM
   Agreed the tolerances might be a little off in one or two.
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: Keith Stevens on December 21, 2020, 02:02:42 PM
The owners name is Scott Main. I have done business with him off and on for the past 10 years and have been satisfied with his products.
Looks like I will be changing the springs out and I can't tell you how much I love to do this with the engine in the car, at least I have more room to work in the 63 verses the 71 429 Ranchero.
Greg

Stop your whining! LOL   I did it on my Mustang with power brakes and pent roof 427 cast aluminum covers.  A gentleman here was kind enough to loan me his tool for doing them doing them on bolting the pivot on the shaft pads. It went perfectly.
Title: Re: Cam King
Post by: gregaba on December 21, 2020, 02:17:48 PM
But I love to whine. Makes my day and everybody gets to make fun of me.
I have the tool but bending over the fender takes a toll on my back.
I just love to change out number 8,2,3, and 6.
Brent- I will give you a call on the crower lifters after the first.
Greg