FE Power Forums

FE Power Forums => FE Technical Forum => Topic started by: chris401 on June 13, 2014, 11:24:51 PM

Title: 69 428 w/o Extra Webbing?
Post by: chris401 on June 13, 2014, 11:24:51 PM
Found this add. Not looking to buy just curious. Did these blocks offer 428 cores? I have wondered about the cores in an engine I had. In 100 deg weather, loaded trailer my 69 .060 over 390 never had overheating issues. http://austin.craigslist.org/pts/4504509427.html
Title: Re: 69 428 w/o Extra Webbing?
Post by: Ford428CJ on June 14, 2014, 09:16:11 AM
Not a 428. Needs a "X", "A" or a "C" on the back of the block. And not all 428's came with extra webbing.  ;D
Title: Re: 69 428 w/o Extra Webbing?
Post by: cjshaker on June 14, 2014, 10:34:19 PM
I have always been under the impression that the only true test for a 428 block was the drill bit test, because I thought Ford used different rear bulkhead mold patterns on all sorts of blocks over the years of production. But I am no expert on all the changes (and there are many) that Ford made over the years. One thing is for sure, the drill bit test is a quick judgment as to whether or not it will handle the bore size of a 428 instead of wondering if it just a severely overbored 360/390.
Title: Re: 69 428 w/o Extra Webbing?
Post by: Ford428CJ on June 14, 2014, 11:47:53 PM
http://www.428cobrajet.org/id-block
Title: Re: 69 428 w/o Extra Webbing?
Post by: chris401 on June 15, 2014, 02:37:25 AM
Good post on link Wes. That was the first thing I noticed was this block has the same makeup as my 70 390 I have now. The only blocks I have had that did have 428 cores and webbing were D3 and D4 castings. Guy in add may have straight cores cut to max.
Title: Re: 69 428 w/o Extra Webbing?
Post by: bn69stang on June 17, 2014, 05:46:51 PM
Yep and most likely the block is done , i have 2  428 cj blocks , both have  C7ME A and the c on the back , and 428 in the water jackets .. Bud