FE Power Forums

FE Power Forums => Non-FE Discussion Forum => Topic started by: Hubble63 on February 17, 2014, 01:21:27 PM

Title: block
Post by: Hubble63 on February 17, 2014, 01:21:27 PM
I have a ford block in my shop and don't no what it is. block numbers are D2AE-ca HELP lol
Title: Re: block
Post by: machoneman on February 17, 2014, 01:36:05 PM
http://www.mustangtek.com/block/Block.html
Title: Re: block
Post by: Hubble63 on February 17, 2014, 02:17:26 PM
 :) thanks 351 Cleveland found it in a dumpster on the way to be scraped
Title: Re: block
Post by: Heo on February 17, 2014, 04:57:44 PM
Nice find. I like the Cleveland engines
Title: Re: block
Post by: Hubble63 on February 18, 2014, 04:26:53 PM
its a 2 barrel but still a 351 c  now need to find something to use it in lol  :)
Title: Re: block
Post by: cjshaker on February 18, 2014, 10:31:34 PM
There's really no difference between the 2bbl and the 4bbl blocks. Some 4bbl blocks had 4 bolt mains, but even then the only difference is the caps. Get some aftermarket or factory caps and whalaa ;)
Title: Re: block
Post by: Heo on February 19, 2014, 12:44:54 AM
Yes there is material to drill for four bolt caps.
And if you build it get a cam with a Cleveland
grind and not with some Chevy grind.
Relativly easy to get 400 hp with 2v heads
I dont know how it is today but in the 80s
people was afraid of 4v heads so they was
almost free. Contrary to their rumor to not
work on the street they do if you dont go
to wild on the duration. They make Power
anyway
Title: Re: block
Post by: fastback 427 on February 19, 2014, 01:26:26 AM
Like the others said the Clevelands aren't a slouch. Thin wall block that are best bored out no more than 30 thouthands. Dan Jones has tons of Info on them. With the closed chamber quench head 500 HP on pump gas is possible with factory stroke.
Title: Re: block
Post by: Heo on February 19, 2014, 02:29:20 AM
I dont understand why ford killed the
Cleveland and continued to make the
Windsor ???
Title: Re: block
Post by: machoneman on February 19, 2014, 08:13:50 AM
Weight, physical size and the fact that both engines were of similar C.I.D., hp and torque. Cheaper to pick one (the W) and focus on it and it's easier to fit (width) in more vehicles. That's what the 'word' was back then.   
Title: Re: block
Post by: blykins on February 19, 2014, 08:17:55 AM
Don't scrap it.  I'll take it.  I build a lot of Clevelands and I actually prefer them over the Windsors.  Canted valve heads make lots of horsey-power....

Title: Re: block
Post by: Heo on February 19, 2014, 12:03:14 PM
I prefer the CL over the w too. Better heads
better bottom end no messing with water
when you swap intake
Think if ford had killed the springtowers
and continued with the CL and made better
exhaust ports and continued to develope it
20 more years instead of the Windsor
Where had we standed today both with factory
and aftermarket parts

Naaa lets scrap this 4 years old modern design...
Or wait!! Lets send it to the underside of the eart
and continue with this 50s design ::)
Title: Re: block
Post by: Hubble63 on February 20, 2014, 01:50:15 PM
 8) what kind of rpms  will the c run and stay together
Title: Re: block
Post by: blykins on February 20, 2014, 03:58:20 PM
Whatever you need....lots of 1/4 milers and road race guys turning them to 7000-8000.
Title: Re: block
Post by: Heo on February 20, 2014, 04:07:06 PM
Missed a shift and left the scale on the tach :-[(8k)
and it stayed together. But i dont Think it will like it
for a whole day ;D
You got smaller dia.crank bearing so you can spin
the crank faster theoretical than a Windsor
Today i realy dont know with new parts availibel????
Havent built an Engine since the 80s
There was a mustang around here they said he
reved 9500-10000 through the traps if its true i dont know
but that Cleveland realy liked to rev.
it was the whole deal with portplates on the exhaust side
rumored to be an old Prostock engine
Title: Re: block
Post by: fastback 427 on February 20, 2014, 06:07:49 PM
Had a buddy who built a Cleveland in the early 80's for his 67 fastback. Closed chamber quench 4bbl heads, Bob glidden pistons, custom rockers, .700 lift cam, polished factory rods. Was a dog below 6000 rpm, pulled hard at 7000, insane at 8000 and felt like time warp after 9000. He regularly shifted at 10000. He pulled it apart after 18 years and the only thing wrong was some rod stretch. Car had no street manners and he drove around at 3500 to 4000 rpm.
Title: Re: block
Post by: Heo on February 20, 2014, 06:34:30 PM
A friend is building one with four weber DCOE s on a crossram intake
raised exhaust ports and a roller cam  for a Mustang but his buissnes is taking
up to much of his time so progress is slow
Interesting to se how it works out
Title: Re: block
Post by: Hubble63 on February 21, 2014, 02:42:09 PM
what type of pistons  are they using on the  2 barrel heads
Title: Re: block
Post by: cammerfe on February 21, 2014, 09:57:29 PM
Back when I was doing such things, the usual idea was to use flat tops.

KS
Title: Re: block
Post by: Hubble63 on February 22, 2014, 08:27:50 PM
does any one no of a nice forum like this one for 351 c  engines  :)
Title: Re: block
Post by: fastback 427 on February 22, 2014, 11:51:51 PM
Haha, good luck!  What other forum could compete? ;D.  I'd figure out what purpose the engine will be used for. Then find a good shop to get you started. If it was found I'd get it checked out first, bore size and magnafluxed. It could be junk. There's a lot of info on the net about the Cleveland. Dan Jones might be the Jay Brown of Cleveland engines ;)
Title: Re: block
Post by: garyv on February 23, 2014, 06:49:12 AM
If you are looking for a good Cleveland/Windsor forum try the 351Cforum.com.   Its run by Brent Lykins whom is a member here.
He builds a lot of FE's and Clevelands.
Lots of good info there.
garyv
Title: Re: block
Post by: mmason on February 23, 2014, 09:31:29 AM
Here is one I found.
http://351c.net/board/
Title: Re: block
Post by: 66FAIRLANE on February 23, 2014, 07:05:57 PM
does any one no of a nice forum like this one for 351 c  engines  :)

You could check out the Cleveland section in the workshop area of this forum.

http://www.fordforums.com.au/

We been playin' with Clevelands for a long time.
Title: Re: block
Post by: Hubble63 on February 24, 2014, 12:16:35 AM
 :-[ I have looked the heads over cant find casting numbers  help thanks
Title: Re: block
Post by: blykins on February 25, 2014, 06:44:25 AM
Throw some pics up and I can help.

Since it's Cleveland and not FE, I don't think Jay would mind me posting this link...

www.the351cforum.com

Title: Re: block
Post by: fe66comet on April 13, 2014, 02:00:27 PM
Cleaveland heads do fit Windsor blocks with a couple holes drilled, that makes a Boss. Combine that with the stronger Windsor block and a 427 stroker kit you got a SBF monster. Also the aftermarket blocks have Cleveland mains and four bolt caps for huge power and rpm. The Cleaveland engine did have it's issues as did the 400 modified, cracks were frequent in the lightweight castings and oiling problems were also a big issue. The 385 series was the solution for replacing the Cleveland and the FE. Both engines were phased out due to emissions requirements in automobiles as neither could pass. The Windsor was redesigned with low compression EGR open chamber heads to fit the bill but as we all know the eighties is a dark spot in automotive history where 200 HP often was unheard of.