FE Power Forums

FE Power Forums => FE Technical Forum => Topic started by: Drew Pojedinec on October 16, 2013, 10:43:06 AM

Title: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Drew Pojedinec on October 16, 2013, 10:43:06 AM
Jay,
Do you still have the pictures that are missing from this thread:  http://www.network54.com/Forum/74182/thread/1234198030/Jay+Brown-+Galaxie+Suspension
It would answer a few questions for me.

Redoing the rear end in my car and trying to figure everything out beforehand.  Anyone else with a 63-64 please feel free to chime in, it'll be very helpful.
I doubt I'd need as large a tire as you have, but since I'm doing everything, I might as well massage as much room possible while I have it all apart.

Thanks!
Dp
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: jayb on October 16, 2013, 11:38:15 AM
Sure...

(http://fepower.net/Photos/Posts/rearsp1.JPG)

(http://fepower.net/Photos/Posts/rearsp2.JPG)


(http://fepower.net/Photos/Posts/rearsp3.JPG)


(http://fepower.net/Photos/Posts/rearsp4.JPG)


(http://fepower.net/Photos/Posts/rearsp5.JPG)


Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Heo on October 16, 2013, 03:43:27 PM
I had 275/60r 15 BFG on 8.5 American racing TT
and it touched on one side(outside) if i had people in the
rear seat
Now i have 255/75 or 70 i dont remember and they
clear with full load hard to get in and out of the Wheel
house though
So with a carefully centered rearend i Think 275 is possible
without cuting anything.
If that is of any help for you
Title: Jay, what's the reason(s) for the cable on the front of Cal Trac?
Post by: Qikbbstang on October 18, 2013, 09:19:32 AM
Limit travel, hold up the bar in the event of catastrophic failure,  sanctioning rules,  piece of mind Or ........?
BTW the small (economy) jack-stands (pictured under the rear) especially at max lift have "surprisingly" little stability. I found out the hard after tipping a car into a garage wall as it fell over - so I'm gun-shy whenever I see them . At least IF you use one a 3-5 Ton stand on the other side the axle (which you might already have there) it adds some stability to the small stand. Small footprint stands are a nightmare waiting to happen. I ended up welding large steel plates under my small footprint stands and pouncing on 3-5 ton stands that are majorly stable whenever I found them priced right
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Heo on October 18, 2013, 10:49:25 AM
I dont know in Jays case but i use wires
like that to not perform a pole jump ;D
if the rod end broke
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: jayb on October 18, 2013, 11:58:26 AM
I dont know in Jays case but i use wires
like that to not perform a pole jump ;D
if the rod end broke
That is exactly why they are there.  NHRA has started enforcing their use on traction bars like Cal-Tracs, I'm told...
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Drew Pojedinec on October 18, 2013, 12:28:29 PM
either way, appreciate the input Jay and Heo.
Just wanted a lil info bookmarked for when I get started on the project.
Title: Re: Jay, what's the reason(s) for the cable on the front of Cal Trac?
Post by: jayb on October 18, 2013, 12:59:50 PM
BTW the small (economy) jack-stands (pictured under the rear) especially at max lift have "surprisingly" little stability. I found out the hard after tipping a car into a garage wall as it fell over - so I'm gun-shy whenever I see them . At least IF you use one a 3-5 Ton stand on the other side the axle (which you might already have there) it adds some stability to the small stand. Small footprint stands are a nightmare waiting to happen. I ended up welding large steel plates under my small footprint stands and pouncing on 3-5 ton stands that are majorly stable whenever I found them priced right

Those are actually 6 ton jackstands, BB, not the small ones.  They are plenty stable - Jay
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: LuxurySportCoupe on October 19, 2013, 12:20:43 PM
I had 275/60r 15 BFG on 8.5 American racing TT
and it touched on one side(outside) if i had people in the
rear seat
Now i have 255/75 or 70 i dont remember and they
clear with full load hard to get in and out of the Wheel
house though
So with a carefully centered rearend i Think 275 is possible
without cuting anything.
If that is of any help for you

I've got a 275 60 on mine. The rear must have been centered pretty well from the factory though, because they don't rub at all. I'm not going to try, but it almost looks like there is room to fit 295's in there. That's on a 15x8, 4.5 backspace American Racing 200.
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Drew Pojedinec on October 19, 2013, 01:25:25 PM
Jay, (or anyone with the monoleafs)
How does the rear end hold up compared to 4-5leaf springs when towing your lil teardrop trailer or with any other load on in the back?
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: jayb on October 19, 2013, 02:23:00 PM

I've got a 275 60 on mine. The rear must have been centered pretty well from the factory though, because they don't rub at all. I'm not going to try, but it almost looks like there is room to fit 295's in there. That's on a 15x8, 4.5 backspace American Racing 200.

That is a good looking car.  I definitely need to get my '64 back on the road...
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: jayb on October 19, 2013, 02:25:05 PM
Jay, (or anyone with the monoleafs)
How does the rear end hold up compared to 4-5leaf springs when towing your lil teardrop trailer or with any other load on in the back?

If I recall correctly Travis at Cal-Trac recommended that you replace the monoleaf springs every 3-4 years, so I would say they don't hold up as well long term.  They don't drag way down under the weight of my little trailer, though.
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Randy on November 06, 2013, 11:32:30 AM
We have L-60 15 under our cars you could do this pretty ease we just ground off about a 1/4 inch on the inner edge and used 8 inch wheels with a 4 1/2 inch inside off set.
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: ScotiaFE on November 06, 2013, 01:58:29 PM
Gezz Randy

What are those L 60's 30 years?
Must be getting close to some fresh rubber... :P
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Heo on November 06, 2013, 02:27:26 PM
I still have some N50 15s Formula 1 Super Stock
any one remember those? :)  on some 12 in wide slotmags
the widest tire you could buy in Sweden in the 70s ;D ;D
maby some longer shackles and air shocks and i can fit
them on my 64 Galaxie
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: jayb on November 06, 2013, 04:52:47 PM
I remember those!  Every time you saw them, they were hanging two inches outside the fender because nobody was tubbing their cars back then.  On a lot of cars there would be groove in the tread from the fender banging down on the tire over bumps  :o
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: Heo on November 06, 2013, 05:23:56 PM
A guy im my Town had a 63 impala with N50s maby 4 inch
hanging out. And he had  cut front springs  riding shotgun
you had to hold on to the dashbord. The rear bumper was
so high you could drive under it with Another car :o
I still remember the first time i saw it i was maby 13-14
years old and thought it was the most awsome car ever ::) ::).
And ofcause he had a superior steering Wheel. 8 inch dia
Cadillac 59 tail lights glued to the stock ones
he tried to pass inspection with it and got 22 remarks ;D ;D
a record that was for many years
Title: Re: 63-64 Galaxie rears
Post by: hyper64 on November 09, 2013, 06:32:07 PM
On my 1964 Custom, I run a 275/60-15 on an eight inch steel wheel with 4.5 backspace. It doesn't rub at all but putting them on and or taking them off the car is interesting. I have to put the jackstands on the frame and let the housing sag, at that point I can shoehorn them in. I hope I don't get a flat driving down the road.  Jim M