Poll

What would be more interesting to see the results of?

7500 rpm hydraulic roller FE
49 (58.3%)
7500 rpm solid flat tappet FE build with low spring pressure and some "non-normal" parts combinations
35 (41.7%)

Total Members Voted: 79

Voting closed: August 14, 2018, 12:23:19 PM

Author Topic: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?  (Read 23299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CaptCobrajet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #30 on: August 08, 2018, 12:39:57 PM »
Brent, if you bore the cam tunnel in a topoiler style block, you should look at making the oil groove deeper.  I usually make them 427 size and depth when we bore the tunnel because you have to fix the groove anyway.  Some 390 blocks have a very shallow groove even before boring the tunnel.  There are 60mm babbit bearings for the 2.500 bore.

I turned one of those "dueling 390" hydraulic rollers 7500 on hydraulic rollers just to see if it would go there.  Peak power was at 7000, but it did not float at 7500.  Ford non-adjustable, conical spring, 11/32 valves.  240/248 at .050........it is doable.
Blair Patrick

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4828
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #31 on: August 08, 2018, 12:46:05 PM »
Will do.

Running 7mm and 5/16" stem valves here. 

It may just work.....

Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

Tommy-T

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #32 on: August 08, 2018, 02:22:34 PM »
Hydraulic lifters are for girls. 8)

Tommy

BigBlueIron

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #33 on: August 08, 2018, 02:46:27 PM »
I vote the flat tappet for only one simple reason. Class rules, some groups do not allow a roller cam unless factory equipped.

In the near future I hope to start assembly on just such an engine for a pulling truck. Blair has a set of heads with my name on them for just such an application. But granted I am the minority. 

FElony

  • Guest
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #34 on: August 08, 2018, 04:47:31 PM »
Hydraulic lifters are for girls. 8)

Tommy

You sold all your shit, so go to the back of the line, pussy.

FElony

  • Guest
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #35 on: August 08, 2018, 04:50:02 PM »
Grassroots?  Can you explain?

Every time I have brought up something along the lines of DIY grassroots, you have shot it down. Not wasting my time again.

Nightmist66

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #36 on: August 08, 2018, 09:38:14 PM »
I vote for the solid flat tappet.  A 12:1 high rpm 390 just screams old school.


If you can wait just a lil longer.......... :)
Jared



66 Fairlane GT 390 - .035" Over 390, Wide Ratio Top Loader, 9" w/spool, 4.86

babybolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #37 on: August 09, 2018, 09:12:34 AM »
In another post or two Felony will be telling you to run flat solids on one side the block and rollers on the other side of the same block.

plovett

  • Guest
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #38 on: August 09, 2018, 09:17:34 AM »
I vote for the solid flat tappet.  A 12:1 high rpm 390 just screams old school.


If you can wait just a lil longer.......... :)

Cool! I can't wait to hear about it. 

Drew Pojedinec

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2117
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #39 on: August 09, 2018, 10:07:15 AM »
I mean, we all love seeing engines that show big on the dyno and never see the insides of an engine bay, right? I mean, nobody actually drives an FE hither and thither, right? Daily? Oh, drat and pshaw.

I don’t own a vehicle without an fe. So yes, daily driven.
Let’s see yours. Otherwise get to the back of the line felony. 
« Last Edit: August 09, 2018, 10:41:16 AM by Drew Pojedinec »

6667fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 719
  • Every Second Counts
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #40 on: August 09, 2018, 10:33:33 AM »
Vote for high rolling hydro roller. Bring it on. JB
JB


67 Fairlane 500
482 cid 636/619.
Tunnel Wedge, Survival EMC CNC heads, Lykins Custom Hydraulic Roller, Ram adjustable clutch, Jerico 4-spd, Strange third member with Detroit Locker, 35 spline axles, 4.86
10.68@125.71 1.56 60’

Tommy-T

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #41 on: August 09, 2018, 11:36:02 AM »
Hydraulic lifters are for girls. 8)

Tommy

You sold all your shit, so go to the back of the line, pussy.

While it is true that I sold my Thunderbird & Mustang, I am actively building a 427 stroker (with a solid flat tappet cam) for my '65 Cyclone. That fact was included in the post where I revealed that I did sell those 2 cars.

Never let a snarky reply get in the way of the facts.

Pussy, indeed.

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4461
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #42 on: August 09, 2018, 12:03:56 PM »
I don’t own a vehicle without an fe. So yes, daily driven.
Let’s see yours. Otherwise get to the back of the line felony.

That alone is pretty cool, Drew. I've got 5 licensed and insured vehicles that I alone drive, 3 of which are FE powered, and I'm about to add a 4th to that FE list. One of those 6 is about to get parked permanently, and it ain't one of the FE ones, so yes, driven ALMOST daily.

While it is true that I sold my Thunderbird & Mustang, I am actively building a 427 stroker (with a solid flat tappet cam) for my '65 Cyclone. That fact was included in the post where I revealed that I did sell those 2 cars.

You should post about that, Tommy. I'd love to hear more about it.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

FElony

  • Guest
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #43 on: August 09, 2018, 01:54:11 PM »
So much more fun being a bad guy instead of a good guy.

On a serious note, I like Barry Ratrodnick's second paragraph in post #18.

Tommy-T

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: What would you rather see R&D on?
« Reply #44 on: August 09, 2018, 02:15:09 PM »
I don’t own a vehicle without an fe. So yes, daily driven.
Let’s see yours. Otherwise get to the back of the line felony.

That alone is pretty cool, Drew. I've got 5 licensed and insured vehicles that I alone drive, 3 of which are FE powered, and I'm about to add a 4th to that FE list. One of those 6 is about to get parked permanently, and it ain't one of the FE ones, so yes, driven ALMOST daily.

While it is true that I sold my Thunderbird & Mustang, I am actively building a 427 stroker (with a solid flat tappet cam) for my '65 Cyclone. That fact was included in the post where I revealed that I did sell those 2 cars.

You should post about that, Tommy. I'd love to hear more about it.

Doug,
You can follow the build in the Members Projects section of the FE Forum.