Author Topic: 390 short block ????  (Read 36047 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

unclewill

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2017, 09:38:13 AM »
Nice!
1969 Ford Cobra, 482 side oiler, BBM aluminum heads, FiTech EFI, Edelbrock 7105, Comp 292H, CR 4 speed, 9", 3.50

scott foxwell

  • Guest
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2017, 10:55:31 AM »
My current combo is an early 64 390 block  with the nubs that was cross bolted, filled with hard block and then bored to 4.130 and lined honed. It has an eagle crank, rods, weisco 13 to 1 pistons, Crain roller cam and lifters, ebock heads fully ported, with 2.15 and 1.72 valves, Crain springs, victor intake ported to match the heads, msd ignition. Use a cobrajet c6 with a tci kit and brake. In my mustang it has run 10.19 at 130 mph leaving at 3500 and shifting at 6000.
What stroke?

George vega

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #17 on: July 04, 2017, 10:21:50 AM »
3.98, 428.

The marking pics are on my new block.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2017, 10:24:01 AM by George vega »
68 Mustang Cobra Jet tribute Race Car

scott foxwell

  • Guest
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #18 on: July 04, 2017, 10:38:51 AM »
I have an identical complete S code engine.

George vega

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #19 on: July 04, 2017, 11:43:09 AM »
So far it looks like a good solid core.
68 Mustang Cobra Jet tribute Race Car

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7409
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #20 on: July 04, 2017, 12:07:23 PM »
George, do you have any pictures of the deck of the block?  From those you can tell if it has the 428 water jacket cores (and thicker cylinders).
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

scott foxwell

  • Guest
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #21 on: July 04, 2017, 01:43:57 PM »
The block I have which I'm guessing is the same as the one George has does not have the 428 water passages but does pass the drill test and it passes the test between all the cylinders so you can rule out at least front to back core shift.
I'm going to punch mine out to 4.11 and use the Icon IC868 piston, 3.98 stroke steel crank and a 6.80 Chevy rod. I'm having Adney Brown build me an offset ground truck crank with a 3.98 stroke and 2.20 Chevy journal. The piston has a pretty big dish but it's going to be .008 out of the hole so I'll take another .010 off the deck, take .018 off the piston and bring the compression up to a little over 10:1. Only thing I wish I could do is get a better ring pack but 1/16 x 2, 3/16 isn't the end of the world for a 600hp street engine. I really like the Icon pistons.

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4829
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #22 on: July 04, 2017, 03:11:34 PM »
Scott, sent you a PM....
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

George vega

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #23 on: July 04, 2017, 10:17:21 PM »
George, do you have any pictures of the deck of the block?  From those you can tell if it has the 428 water jacket cores (and thicker cylinders).

I've  already looked Jay. The water passages are real clean. I looked at the center freeze plugs and at the floor of the rear water jacket. It does pass the drill test in all the cylinders.
68 Mustang Cobra Jet tribute Race Car

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7409
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #24 on: July 04, 2017, 10:26:20 PM »
I was talking about the shape of the water jacket holes in the deck.  The 428 water jacket cores leave a hole in the deck that extends down below the head bolt hole, while a 390 water jacket core hole doesn't, see the pics below.

390:





428:

Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

thatdarncat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #25 on: July 04, 2017, 10:46:17 PM »
Jay, one thing for everyone to note - Dennis K, who supplied that blueprint you have referenced, has commented on the FE Facebook page, that the FE block deck water passage shape info ( short triangle for 390, tall triangle for 428, round hole for 427 ) ONLY applies to DIF cast blocks. The later MCC cast blocks ( like the D3TE & D4TE ) will tend to have the "428" style water passage shape, but do not have the 428 cylinder cores since MCC never cast 428 blocks. Just something to know so people don't mistakenly apply that tip to those blocks.
Kevin Rolph

1967 Cougar Drag Car ( under constuction )
1966 7 litre Galaxie
1966 Country Squire 390
1966 Cyclone GT 390
1968 Torino GT 390
1972 Gran Torino wagon
1978 Lincoln Mk V

fomocoloco

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #26 on: July 05, 2017, 07:24:27 AM »
i have one of those 64 blocks. it is at a fresh .030 bore. i have not had it sonic tested.

jim oberg
9 65-72  f100 sb trucks 6 428's 1 460 2 521 strokers
1 66 f100 lb ranger
3 67-75 f350
numerous parts vehicles and parts

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4829
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #27 on: July 05, 2017, 07:28:37 AM »
I would be very leery about taking any 390 block to 4.130".  I've tried several times and was able to do it 1 out of 4 times...wasted 3 blocks in the process, even after sonic testing them.  You would have to sonic test every square inch of a cylinder and even if you get a block that looks thick, it can really be thin in spots.  In addition to that, there's really no reason to do it, especially when you can make up the displacement (and a ton more) with a crankshaft.  Ring seal and reliability are paramount.
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

Gregwill16

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #28 on: July 05, 2017, 09:19:37 AM »
+1 Brent. After Dale showed me how to sonic check one block and then let me sonic several others of my own, the person doing it has to have some integrity and move around and record the thinnest spot or the check is very misleading.

George vega

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: 390 short block ????
« Reply #29 on: July 05, 2017, 09:50:35 AM »
I was talking about the shape of the water jacket holes in the deck.  The 428 water jacket cores leave a hole in the deck that extends down below the head bolt hole, while a 390 water jacket core hole doesn't, see the pics below.

390:





428:



This is a pic of the deck Jay. It has flashing that hasn't been removed yet in some of the cooling holes.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2017, 10:38:59 AM by George vega »
68 Mustang Cobra Jet tribute Race Car