Author Topic: Blue thunder heads  (Read 30596 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Blue thunder heads
« on: January 28, 2016, 09:00:32 AM »
Does anyone know if blue thunder FE heads will ever be available again ? Are they doing anything at all any longer ?
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2016, 09:03:17 AM »
Bob Maag

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2016, 09:24:05 AM »
So Barry act has some bare Hi rise // heads ?  Awesome. !! Tax time isa coming  :D
« Last Edit: January 28, 2016, 09:26:37 AM by fekbmax »
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2016, 11:00:51 AM »
I wish I had some.
They have been out of stock for quite a while.
He will probably make more - but its always a long time between runs...

Chrisss31

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2016, 04:15:40 PM »
How do Blue Thunder heads stack up compared to the new BBM heads?

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2016, 08:00:09 PM »
I've only seen one set of the BBM heads, but casting wise the Blue Thunder heads I've got look much better, more like aircraft quality castings.  I don't think anyone making aluminum castings can hold a candle to the quality of the Blue Thunder parts.  In design I have been told that the BBM heads are basically very similar to the early medium riser Blue Thunders, but with a conventional valvetrain arrangement rather than being set up for the T&D race rocker system.  The early Blue Thunder medium riser heads were very good from the port and chamber perspective, so if the BBM heads are similar, I'm sure they are very good also.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2016, 08:36:31 PM »
As far as all out performance/ max effort wedge head, what would be the best head ? Blue thunder high riser with its quinch type combustion chamber ? Dove Hi rise parquet port ? Tunnel port ? Highly modified medium riser ? Something else all together ?
I'm talking a head that could actually be had (in time) and have the full max effort work done.
Let's leave the billet heads out of it for now.
« Last Edit: January 28, 2016, 08:40:19 PM by fekbmax »
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

KMcCullah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2016, 09:12:27 PM »
Hey Keith- You should talk to Blair Patrick about a killer set of his Pro Ports. I sure am satisfied with mine.
Kevin McCullah


428kidd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2016, 09:22:00 PM »
Blair Patrick Pro ports for sure if your going max effort! ;D ;D

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4461
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2016, 09:33:18 PM »
Blair Patrick Pro ports for sure if your going max effort! ;D ;D

I don't think you'll find too many arguments with that statement. That's what I am going with for my current build.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2016, 09:48:09 PM »
I think the Blue Thunder high risers would be the top of the heap. Just my opinion. Like Jay said they are the best quality bare/machined castings available as well. They have more potential and have more average flow versus all out pro ports, if both are CNC maxed out. The high riser will have a higher entry angle and higher floor and roof both, by a large margin even versus the DOVE HR PIE ports, also better short side radius into the bowl then chamber.

Not to say that max effort CNC Pro Ports would be anything to sneeze at, and likely a very close second, big power potential and available castings. I think the BT heads have the edge also on the T&D rocker pad layout and design/strength.

Your results/opinions may vary.

I do happen to have a new/recent set (less than 24 months old LOL) of untouched BT HR quench chamber, narrow valve center (428HR) castings in the box. I waited 3 years for those to come available being on a waiting list. I also have a FE Power HR adapter and a 2 piece 1x4 Dominator race manifold that is superior to any 351C intake for a new top-end for my 487, swapping with my MR deal sometime within the next season. Should be interesting...
« Last Edit: January 28, 2016, 09:49:58 PM by XR7 »
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2016, 10:03:06 PM »
Sweet !!!
I'm jealous..
I you wanna part with such heads as they are, I'd love to be on the short list lol..
I know, fat chance lol..
Ofcourse I'd Haveta get a second mortgage... LoL..
« Last Edit: January 28, 2016, 10:09:43 PM by fekbmax »
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4461
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2016, 08:35:59 AM »
I didn't even think about the Highriser heads, so I'd have to agree with Thor. Probably because it requires an entirely different top end...and I've never had a Highriser. When it comes to any standard port configuration, I'd put the Pro Ports up there. Every BT piece I've had has been exceptional quality.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2016, 09:12:32 AM »
The problem with Blue Thunder FE parts has always been availability.  Right now, they are just not available; heads, intake manifolds, and valve covers are all on back order, or so I have been told.  If you want something in the short term, the Edelbrock Pro-Ports are the best way to go.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2016, 04:00:38 PM »
So the big question is then if anyone would care to answer, 
Blair Patrick max effort pro ports, CNC, titanium valves, machine for TnD race rockers
How much $$$ ??
A good ball park figure will be OK.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2016, 04:08:41 PM by fekbmax »
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

CaptCobrajet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2016, 06:29:55 PM »
I think the answer to that question depends on what the intended purpose is.   My definition of "max efort" may not be the same as others.  I can tell you for sure that the assumption that a BT High Riser is THE best max effort casting is just not the case.  The Edelbrock casting can be prepped to meet or exceed anything you can do with the BT HR head.  It does require a high port plate, a valve cover rail spacer, and the use of the T&D race valvetrain to do it, but I promise you with no doubt about it, that the Pro Port casting is up to the task.  It is available, and in raw form, much less expensive per casting than the BT head, which is not available anyway.  I decided a few years ago that I could not afford to sink the development and programming effort into a BT head that was/is hard to get, and possibly not available.   A person in the business of custom porting just can't do it based on a one-time, or a few-time opportrunity.    I can get the port just as high as, higher actually, in the Ed head as the BT.  The mounting pads for the T&D will become too thin to keep from pulling the top of the head off if you go too far with the BT without a high port plate, which ends up making all of the heads a candidate for the high port plate.  That's all I want to say about the intake port plate unless you contact me at the shop, but let's just say it is a high riser on steroids,  it requires a custom manifold, and it is not cheap.

Pro Ports can be done all kinds of ways. I would not normally post prices in a thread like this, but the question was asked.  The "Street Pro Port" can be had for $3500 ready for springs........that includes the cost of the castings, super alloy Ferrea custom valves, valvejob, blending, valves lapped, and seals.  The heads  have a Meduim Riser intake port location, require no offset valvetrain, can be used with OEM mounting, or milled for race T&D for a minimal charge.  I have not made more than 785 hp/710 torque with that head.  It is the most bang-for-the-buck head that I know of at $3500.  It has much smaller port volume than other heads that start life with an "as cast" port.  The other day we ran a set on a 390 with a .525 lift solid roller cam I just came up with and it made 550 hp at 6300, and had peak torque of 483.  The point being.....that version of the Pro Port is usable on anything from  360 or so inches to 500 inches and does not break the bank.

From there, "max effort" is a very broad term.  I have some "sure 'nuff" max effort stuff that is $12K-plus for a complete pair.......and then it goes down from there depending on what you are doing and how much you want to spend.  A set of 850 hp capable Pro Ports that work with a modified Tunnel Wedge would be $5K before hardware.  The cost per HP in heads  from 850-capable to 1000-capable is high in an FE.  A bunch of stuff has to change with the heads, manifold, and other pieces, to get past the 850 hp threshhold with certainty and reliability.  Lots of stuff in between the "street" and the 'extreme" heads, but the best CNC stuff that comes from here will all start life from the Pro Port casting.

The BT and the BBM heads can certainly make big power, if you work them right.  In my opinion, both would require some filling in places, be it weld or epoxy, to get the best results.  I have had conversations with BBM about a porter's head down the road, and there are/were a number of small port BT castings that have great potential, but are scarce and rare these days.


Blair Patrick

CaptCobrajet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2016, 06:40:13 PM »
Side note about the T&D mounting.  In the extreme, the only way to secure the valvetrain in a raised port FE is by bolting the subplate through the five 1/2" head bolts.  If you raise the port to the "max" in the BT head, the spring pressure will pull the top of the port right off the head.  Using the subplate mounted through the head bolts, there is no stress on the top of the port, and it can be thin there without risk of pulling the head apart.  At the point that use of the subplate/port plate is a requirement, the Ed head is at no height disadvantage...............JMO.
Blair Patrick

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2016, 09:23:03 PM »
Thanks Blair,
That's a great bit of general information and for sure your opinion is well respected.
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

bn69stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2016, 10:22:59 AM »
Thanks Blair for the shared knowledge , much appreciated ..Bud
69 mach 1 , 428 C J  Blue Oval Performance BBM heads -T@D rocker s- Blue thunder intake - Comp hydr roller - MSD ignition - FPA headers- Holley 850 hp double pumper - TKO 600 - 9 inch 3.89 Detroit Locker . ride tech coil over conversion - power rack @ pinoin steering - 13 inch drilled @ slotted 4 wheel disc brakes ..

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2016, 10:34:44 AM »
If you raise the port to the "max" in the BT head, the spring pressure will pull the top of the port right off the head. 

Ain't seen that one yet...

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2016, 09:17:05 PM »
Me neither, never heard of it even. I suppose anything is possible... remember the saying, some people can break a cannon ball, in a sand box, with their bare hands?

First off, I am not trying to argue or be disrespectful in any way, but I am having a hard time understanding this. I don't think the Edelbrock heads can be ported higher than the BT HR heads, at least not without welding or adding material whether it be weld, or aluminum bar stock or whatever (high port plate that you don't want to discuss), to the top of the head. I never thought about welding or adding material under the T&D sub-plate, but I imagine that is what you are talking about Blair. In that case, it wouldn't matter what head you were working with, at that point, any of them would work for that. I guess I was not thinking outside the box and thinking more of ported castings, without weld or epoxy (at least on the roof, filling the floor sure).

I for sure understand your point about availability, no question there. I waited 3 years to get these HR heads and have had them almost 2 years now, before I got Jay's HR adapter and a upper intake I think I can use without too much modification.

I have two sets of BT HR heads here (not all mine of course), and some BT MR, DOVE MR, and also several sets of Edelbrock heads (no BBM yet, but soon!). I did some measuring, as I was thinking about what you said about the top of the head ripping off above the port. The newer style (most recent castings) have increased material under the rocker pad that runs full length of the head, for T&D single piece stands or plate. Anyway when you write something I always read it Blair, and also in talking with you on the phone I always learn something, every time. Your advice is spot on and has helped me stay out of trouble. So I looked at the spring pads and decided to measure them to the bottom of the deck, the BT HR were .230 higher than the Edelbrocks, and .100 higher than the BT MR. The BT HR rocker pad is .810 higher than the Edelbrocks, also of note is the valve guide is .180 longer. Anyway, the Edelbrock head would have trouble sooner than the BT as far as the roof of the port in the bowl, around the valve guide, if raised too much and made thin in that area. I took some pictures of the new style rocker pad on the BT HR and also comparing ot the Edelbrock head, I made a line across the top of where the roof would likely be on the ED (maybe it can go higher yet, but would soon run out of casting) and also at the same hieght on the BT HR. Thought it was interesting...



more views







the BT HR port is as cast, it is small, only 1.330x2.020, the port roof can be raised quite a bit.


Here is a ported HR that didn't go real high at all because the DOVE tunnel wedge intake was not welded on the roof and could not be raised anymore as it was paper thin (manifold) so the head was not raised any further, it did not break into the rocker pad bolts so it wasn't very high at all. It was higher however than where the head bolts would be on a Edelbrock, do at that point, the Ed port would be up into the T&D sub-plate. The black line is not at the same height as on the other heads, it is higher, right at the head bolt bosses, so another 1/4" or so higher than the other black lines in the other pictures... oops. I did not port these, and they were rubbed on before the guy that knew what he was doing ported them so the floor was too low and was not filled for whatever reason.



Here is a BT HR that is raised pretty good and you can see the roof went up into the rocker pad threaded holes. This is pretty common in small blocks and Chevy stuff. I always thought it was weird but pretty common like I said, and you just put some sealer on the threads and not worry about it.




Here is a DOVE HR that has the T&D subplate on top of the port. Again, this is not as high as the BT HR roof, and it is getting thing, just .120 over the head bolt bosses, in height which is lower than the as cast BT HR or any ported versions.



Here is a Ed with the rocker pads machined off to accept the T&D sub-plate, and then installed, this looks like it could be raised higher however, no measurement on this, not my picture.





Here are a few more of the revised BT rocker pad, maybe they did have one rip off or some problems that they decided to beef it up and make it stronger. My thought are that when something like that happens, it is from a crash and the rocker breaks off the mount, not the springs. Or if a spring breaks and it goes into float and or over rev, or valve crashes into piston, or any.all of the above.









« Last Edit: January 31, 2016, 09:27:46 PM by XR7 »
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #21 on: January 31, 2016, 09:31:34 PM »
Are those pro port edelbrock heads ?
I thought the pro ports came with small unfinished ports.
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #22 on: January 31, 2016, 09:42:29 PM »
No they are regular Edelbrocks, a mild port for a street 390 engine. The pro ports do have small ports, made to be CNC ported, but the casting and machining is the same as far as exterior dimensions. I believe the (Pro Ports) ports do have thicker walls (smaller water jacket on the inside) so you can move the ports around. The rocker pads and machining is the same, just the chambers and ports are left small so the porter can do what he wants. The floors are definitely higher, so you can raise/straighten the port and not have to weld or fill with epoxy.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2016, 09:53:51 PM by XR7 »
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

CaptCobrajet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2016, 11:12:13 PM »
Hey Thor,  you are thinking in the right direction.   The Pro Port is machined a little different than the regular Ed at the rocker pad.  They are solid all the way across at the flange.  It requires very tall spacers on the bolt bosses, and a billet aluminium subplate.  When the max effort language entered the discussion, all of the heads need more material to go where I am talking about in terms of port roof height.  All of the heads need the floors filled a bunch, and the Pro Ports have a higher floor as cast, so that part is an easier fix.  The spring pads do have to be modified in the Eds, but easy if done on the front end.  Valve angle gets tweaked a little too, which helps the geometry in the end.  I'm doing some now, just not interested in  putting pics on the interweb.  They are still inline valves, and it will still look like an FE.  You are correct that staying within the confines of the original casting, the BT is taller, but we can't seem to count on those anyway, so I came up with a way to modify the Eds, which are available, to meet the "max effort" call.   At some point, I will have a cnc program for the billet plates that makes the modification much less expensive.  It would also work on the BBM head, but a person would have to be okay with a ton of green stuff in the floor.  I would not want to put that much weld (heat) in the casting as it will soften the head if you do too much, too fast.  I have been plating the Victor manifolds for years to get to the HR port height.  I'm pretty excited about plating Jay's HR adapter to accomodate the extra height of this junk I'm doing now.   It will be much less expensive than a billet valley tray to just modify Jay's piece and then build the spider.  I like to get outside the box like you said, but time to do the R&D on this stuff is hard to come by these days.  I hope all is well up your way..........
Blair Patrick

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2016, 11:48:11 PM »
Well I learned something again, I didn't know the Pro Port casting was solid across the rocker pad, that is smart and should be much stronger support for the T&D rocker sub-plate. I can understand you not wanting to put some pictures on the web on the high end stuff, no issue there.

Just lots of snow and cold weather here, it has warmed up a little and melted most of the snow we had piled up around here...

I am pretty excited about the HR adapter also. I had the valve cover rail raised some on that (just in case) and had Jay put "pro ports" LOL, or small peanut ports in the adapter so I can move them around to suite the head once ported, and the cast intake's runners I have. Here are a few teaser pics, both adapters pictured are high risers. I also had him mill the flange almost up to the valve cover rail, offset pushrod tubes, etc. I had a few other single cast spiders here, but they need too much welding I think.

68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

TomP

  • Guest
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #25 on: February 01, 2016, 03:03:19 AM »
Thor, i'm not sure that will fit under a flat hood!

I kind of think the BT head has more potential because the exhaust is raised too. The whole port casting bolt holes and all. The intake can be raised much more on the HR version.

I have some pix of raw Edelbrock ProPort, here you can see they added material around the rockershaft pedestals.


If the valve angles are altered i'm assuming tipped outward, say to 12 degrees or less? Not that much room to go unless the valve covers are altered, springs would get close to the rail. But it would give more room for rockers and I can see that being an issue with what I wanted to do. As the valves get longer the pushrods need to be further into the intake and the rocker pivot point moves close to the edge of the head. Looking at the Charlie Wescott HR intake for Ray Paquet it looks like they must be using 1.85" pivot length rockers (stock is 1.65 I think) and mounting them to the head and the intake adapter. The valve cover rail appears to be well more than inch further inboard.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2016, 03:05:08 AM by TomP »

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #26 on: February 01, 2016, 08:42:57 AM »
Well I learned something again, I didn't know the Pro Port casting was solid across the rocker pad, that is smart and should be much stronger support for the T&D rocker sub-plate. I can understand you not wanting to put some pictures on the web on the high end stuff, no issue there.

Just lots of snow and cold weather here, it has warmed up a little and melted most of the snow we had piled up around here...

I am pretty excited about the HR adapter also. I had the valve cover rail raised some on that (just in case) and had Jay put "pro ports" LOL, or small peanut ports in the adapter so I can move them around to suite the head once ported, and the cast intake's runners I have. Here are a few teaser pics, both adapters pictured are high risers. I also had him mill the flange almost up to the valve cover rail, offset pushrod tubes, etc. I had a few other single cast spiders here, but they need too much welding I think.



So XR7, what make is that intake? Is it a NASCAR 2 piece unit?
Bob Maag

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #27 on: February 01, 2016, 09:16:32 AM »
Still liking the blue thunder high risers..
I got a exstra kidney or lung, both in good shape,...  :D
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

ec164

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #28 on: February 01, 2016, 11:16:08 AM »
XR7
very impressive looking set up there!!  Are you planning on running it this summer? If so where in Ohio? or what track do you race at, I'm in Mid MI and it would be worth the ride if is actual race day and can check out other than the normal cars I see here in MI. This is also a very interesting thread and always enjoy when Blair and you all are chasing power!! This is a very nice Forum...............Al
You're ahead in a Mercury......all the way

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4461
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2016, 02:17:34 PM »
Thor (XR7) is a little ways from Michigan. A very very long little ways. Actually, I think he may be closer to Alaska than Michigan..lol
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2016, 07:46:06 PM »
Yeah, I'm in Idaho not Ohio, so a long trip away... probably not worth the gas. I still have an engine in the car. I am busy with other projects right now so not sure if I will get this new top end swapped this summer or not. I'd like to!

I'm not really trying to make max power, I'm just a bracket racer. It should do pretty well though. I always wanted to have a high riser 427 since I first got into cars/engines during high school... what a long time ago!

I will say the intake is not for any NASCAR engine, not a small block intake. It doesn't fit perfect, but much closer than the Cleveland stuff. It will need a little work, couple different ways to get there. I'll spill the beans later, but... anyone like to try and guess what intake it actually is? It is a 2 piece and has 5 bolts and 4 dowel pins.

68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

bluef100fe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2016, 09:24:18 PM »
Thor, is that intake the Gen II "Thor" intake for the 385 series blue thunder Thor heads? I've set a A460 intake on a FE before... The fit was remarkably close length and width wise ports were close IIRC never pursued it an further than that. Didn't think of how to keep the oil in either. No valve cover rail on that intake. Very neat work you guys are doing. Wish I had more time to play with this engine stuff these days.


<a href="https://servimg.com/view/14375057/64" target="_blank" ><img  src="https://i58.servimg.com/u/f58/14/37/50/57/img_2013.jpg" border="0" alt="Image hosted by servimg.com" /></a>

Cody Ladowski
1976 F-100 stepside
390 C6 9 inch
1.56 sixty ft.
7.38 @ 91.5
11.79 @ 111.5

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #32 on: February 03, 2016, 05:54:46 PM »
Good guess Cody, but no... it isn't a Blue Thunder "Thor" intake. With a name like that I should run one though! LOL. I have set a couple A460 intakes on the HR adapter, it could be made to work but... my feelings are that those intakes are just too big, cross section and plenum. They are designed for 572 and 598CI and 8000RPM, capable of 1200 HP. I don't want "too big" an intake for these heads.

A friend has the BT 2 piece SBF intake for the 4.3 canted valve heads. That one looked better on size, but the ports don't line up worth beans, 2 on, 2 off a little, 2 off quite a bit, and 2 off a ton. Maybe if it were cut into 8 pieces and Marcella welded it back up right... could probably buy a sheetmetal intake for less $$$$.

Any other guesses?
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #33 on: February 03, 2016, 06:32:41 PM »
No guess on the intake (actually I do have a guess but I don't want to screw up ::))

You are aware of the reason for B.T. 's using the Thor name for their baddest heads?

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #34 on: February 03, 2016, 07:15:03 PM »
No Barry, I actually don't know the answer to that! Please enlighten me.

I wonder why they didn't call the 4.3 the "mini Thor", or Thor Jr.  I have flowed a set of CNC 4.3's with side cant, and they "blew" me away! 443@.800
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

Qikbbstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 892
    • View Profile
I'd asked about the Edelbrock Pro-Ports running "production" Edelbrock water
« Reply #35 on: February 03, 2016, 07:47:38 PM »
jacketing or not and don't believe I ever got an answer.   I believe the Pro-Ports must fit inside the confines of the standard Edelbrock external dimensions -- IF this is true then not having to limit intake and exhaust ports to the confines is why the Factory High-Risers valve covers, intake and exhaust ports all sit noticeably higher then production FEs

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #36 on: February 03, 2016, 08:05:03 PM »
No Barry, I actually don't know the answer to that! Please enlighten me.

I wonder why they didn't call the 4.3 the "mini Thor", or Thor Jr.  I have flowed a set of CNC 4.3's with side cant, and they "blew" me away! 443@.800

Barry! Don't tell him unless he gives up the intake manifold info! HAH!
Bob Maag

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2016, 02:40:14 PM »
LOL Machoneman! Here are a couple more "teaser" pictures, it gives it away really...




Well, Photbucket is running slow and I can't find the other picture I wanted, maybe I'll post it later.
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

TomP

  • Guest
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2016, 03:36:19 PM »
I think it's an intake for a "goddamned LS". What do I win?

I think the LS intakes a better choice than Cleveland, easier to mount, more selection and ports line up better. That one is for a raised port rather than stock head.

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #39 on: February 05, 2016, 03:57:16 PM »
No sir Tom, not an LS. The Chevy bank offset is backwards to a Ford, so our #5 cylinder is toward the front on an LS. None of the LS runners line up worth a damn, well maybe a couple... that and the narrow bore space would require Marcella to weld it back up from 6-8 pieces... something like this. I'm not going there.

68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #40 on: February 05, 2016, 04:15:19 PM »

I think the LS intakes a better choice than Cleveland, easier to mount, more selection and ports line up better. That one is for a raised port rather than stock head.

It is rather unfortunately that the LS manifolds don't fit (as Thor mentioned the side to side offset is wrong).  There are a large variety of those things available, of course, and I think the bore spacing is closer to the FE than a Cleveland is.  Oh well, Cleveland is still the best option, unless you are talking about tunnel ports.  Then, there is a different, interesting option available...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

TomP

  • Guest
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #41 on: February 05, 2016, 10:44:07 PM »
Now i'm curious about what in heck Thor's could be for and also what else fits a Tunnel Port beside a Pontiac Ram Air V.
 Maybe Nailhead Buick but there aren't any intakes worth adapting for those.

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #42 on: February 05, 2016, 11:05:41 PM »
The Ram Air V intake was what I was referring to, Tom  :D
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #43 on: February 06, 2016, 08:08:01 AM »
No Barry, I actually don't know the answer to that! Please enlighten me.

Strange as it may seem (to me :) ) I actually know of only two people who share the name Thor.

You.  And A. T. Francis


sjmodels

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 39
    • View Profile
    • Southerngassers
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #44 on: February 06, 2016, 04:59:12 PM »
There is that Norse god with the big hammer. ???

Heo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3288
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #45 on: February 06, 2016, 06:05:58 PM »
Yes what we call thunder
Is the sound of Tor riding
His chariot over the sky
Slaying gigants with His
Hammer . He is also
The protector of the blacksmits



The defenition of a Gentleman, is a man that can play the accordion.But dont do it

TomP

  • Guest
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #46 on: February 08, 2016, 01:48:08 AM »
Art Thor Francis?

He makes some nice stuff.

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #47 on: February 08, 2016, 08:19:41 PM »
Hey that is kinda cool Barry. I sure did not know that. I have only known 2 (other) people with that name in my lifetime as well. One was in Norway where I was born, and the other I met in a remote fly in hunting camp, in Alaska, where I lived for 15 years. I have heard it is hard to even be able to talk with Art, he doesn't want to talk with customers, prefers them to go through dealers.

I always heard Thor was the Norse god of thunder. I have a hammer, but don't know how to use it...

Here is another picture, the next one after this will be a dead give-away...

68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

Chrisss31

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #48 on: February 10, 2016, 10:42:07 AM »
Busy weekend for the forum!!  So.........I'm ready for the answer ;)

BH107

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #49 on: February 12, 2016, 03:09:27 AM »
Speaking of Blue Thunder heads, I saw a new set for sale on eBay with rockers from one of their distributors.

FE Jonny

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #50 on: February 12, 2016, 11:40:45 AM »
If you are going max effort why not SOHC? I could never afford it but we have discussed the advantages with cam design and high RPM power. Plus no pushrods offer bigger, straighter ports.
Jon Heintz

Nightmist66

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #51 on: February 12, 2016, 09:09:28 PM »
If you are going max effort why not SOHC? I could never afford it but we have discussed the advantages with cam design and high RPM power. Plus no pushrods offer bigger, straighter ports.

Besides the cost as mentioned, another obvious consideration would be real-estate, especially in a shock tower car. Jmo.

And then there's boost or squeeze...........
Jared



66 Fairlane GT 390 - .035" Over 390, Wide Ratio Top Loader, 9" w/spool, 4.86

TomP

  • Guest
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #52 on: February 17, 2016, 03:53:26 PM »
I'm thinking the wedge might have more power potential than the Cammer just because of camshaft limitations in the SOHC design. The thing the Cammer has going for it is allowance for more stroke.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #53 on: February 18, 2016, 02:37:23 PM »
I'm thinking the wedge might have more power potential than the Cammer just because of camshaft limitations in the SOHC design. The thing the Cammer has going for it is allowance for more stroke.

Good point on the SOHC's camshaft/rocker lift issues. I'm quite sure Jay has mulled this over a lot. And I do hope someday he comes up with a viable solution for a lot more lift and duration at the valve while still retaining the head's stock integrity, even if it requires all new cams and rockers. I don't remember what Jay said long ago on the max lift he can attain now (under .800?) but I've often wondered what a SOHC  could do in the hp department with more like Pro Stock lifts of 1" or a tad more. JMO!
« Last Edit: February 18, 2016, 02:39:33 PM by machoneman »
Bob Maag

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #54 on: February 18, 2016, 05:14:32 PM »
I've wondered about the max lift available for the SOHC also, not that I'll ever own one but a friend is going through this now. His idea is too raise the cams, lengthen the valves and lengthen the rockers also, thus trying to get more ratio out of the rockers. Then the lobes could be bigger and with the increased ratio, much more lift could be attained. This sounds like all one off stuff, but he (and a head guru) are looking into it.

I think the SOHC rockers are only 1.3 ratio? Max lobe lift is something like .575 or so? I have never heard the exact numbers. .575 x 1.3 would be 747 gross...

I still have more pictures to post on the BT heads and the "mystery" intake I plan on using on Jay's HR adapter, just been real busy lately and away from home, travel, work,  etc.
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #55 on: February 18, 2016, 07:50:26 PM »
Miraculously, we have all witnessed one of those rare moments when Tom P has hit the nail on the head! ;D ;D ;D

My big SOHC has a reduced base circle on the cam and still maxes out at about 0.740" lift.  Stock rocker ratio is about 1.3:1.  The lobes look super radical compared to a wedge cam, but the lift just isn't there.  If I wanted to reduce the base circle some more I could increase lift, but to fit the lift the duration would have to increase also, and there would be a much greater tendency for valvetrain instability.  Because of the limits of the valve opening profile on the SOHC I think Tom is correct that a wedge FE may have just a little more peak power potential than an SOHC.

But on the other hand, I think its a lot easier to get to the engine's peak power potential with the SOHC.  Its easier to get the ports to work, and as Tom mentioned without the cam in the normal location you can fit a much bigger stroke into the engine, for more cubes, which will pull harder on the ports. 

I also think to get to 1000 naturally aspirated horsepower, you'd probably spend about the same amount of money with either engine.  JMO - Jay
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #56 on: February 18, 2016, 08:42:44 PM »
Cool Jay! Guess we need to wait until a whole bunch of your other FE projects get cleaned up before this topic can be re-visited.
Bob Maag

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #57 on: February 18, 2016, 09:30:14 PM »
So Jay, what do you think about raising the cam bore up, and lengthening rockers, valves, etc. Could it work to attain more lift?
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #58 on: February 18, 2016, 10:56:38 PM »
I actually did a design and started a machining project to go a different route.  This would be to use smaller diameter rocker shafts, and move the rocker fulcrum closer to the cam.  You could use offset bushings in the existing rocker shaft bores to position the new, smaller diameter shafts inboard towards the cam.  My drawings indicated that I could increase the rocker ratio to 1.5:1 this way.  Still a project I want to tackle, but other stuff has gotten in the way...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #59 on: February 20, 2016, 10:26:11 AM »
Appreciate the details. Per my shade tree math, your .570 at the cam with the std. 1.3 rockers nets the .741 valve lift. At a 1.5 rocker, you'd net .885 at the valve. Nothing to sneeze at for sure. It would appear then to approach 1.0, you'd need a 1.75 rocker which would net .998 valve lift.

While a 1" lift isn't any magical number, is it really approachable using your technique or is the .885 a true maximum lift with the SOHC, assuming stock head as-cast cam bearing bosses?
Bob Maag

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #60 on: February 20, 2016, 01:40:24 PM »
I think you would really have to get small in diameter with the rocker shafts in order to get to 1.75:1, or else raise the cam and rocker bosses like Thor suggested.  And then you'd have issues with rocker arm geometry...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

482supersnake

  • Guest
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #61 on: September 23, 2016, 11:55:41 PM »
Hey that is kinda cool Barry. I sure did not know that. I have only known 2 (other) people with that name in my lifetime as well. One was in Norway where I was born, and the other I met in a remote fly in hunting camp, in Alaska, where I lived for 15 years. I have heard it is hard to even be able to talk with Art, he doesn't want to talk with customers, prefers them to go through dealers.

I always heard Thor was the Norse god of thunder. I have a hammer, but don't know how to use it...

Here is another picture, the next one after this will be a dead give-away...




http://www.rolandracing.com/id47.html

What do I win? ;D

How close are the ports Thor?

mummert

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 43
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #62 on: September 26, 2016, 11:44:02 PM »
 I have played with SOHC ATV engines that have rocker ratio issues like the cammer.  In the end the best fix to get higher ratio is to move the valves farther away from the cam centerline and add arm length to the rocker.  Once your at this level, the bore is much bigger than Oem and has room for it.  Adding rocker arm length also reduces the swiping effect across the stem when your trying to achieve high lift.  Last thing  is making room for bigger intake valve and not having clip clearance issues that older hemi designs usually run into, a 2.4" intake would be a nice thing.  I would do it on the intakes at first, that the bang for the buck. Once its refined you could work on shorter duration higher lift exhaust cams and broaden up the mid range.

XR7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #63 on: October 06, 2016, 09:14:07 PM »
Hey that is kinda cool Barry. I sure did not know that. I have only known 2 (other) people with that name in my lifetime as well. One was in Norway where I was born, and the other I met in a remote fly in hunting camp, in Alaska, where I lived for 15 years. I have heard it is hard to even be able to talk with Art, he doesn't want to talk with customers, prefers them to go through dealers.

I always heard Thor was the Norse god of thunder. I have a hammer, but don't know how to use it...

Here is another picture, the next one after this will be a dead give-away...




http://www.rolandracing.com/id47.html

What do I win? ;D

How close are the ports Thor?

Ding Ding Ding... we have a winner! I missed this post, but you are correct, it is a Roland Racing Pontiac manifold for his canted valve heads. I'll buy you luch... just come to my town LOL!

He has a tunnel ram and also a "low" rise single Dominator manifold, so 3 diff. available. The ports line up much better side to side versus a 351C, but the runner entry is higher. It is higher than my high riser heads, I can make it work, bit think it would be too much work for a medium riser. A guy could still get it to work on a MR, just cut off the flange and shorten the runners a bit, weld on a new flange and match it to Jay's adapter. I had Jay mill almost all the flange off the adapter to the valve cover rail, and the manifold still sits high. I also had him mill the valve cover rail 3/8" higher, and had spacers made for the head to help. I did this on Jim's 496CI BT HR engine as well (3/8" raised VC rail on a custom FE Power adapter), with the sheetmetal intake and 2x4 Dominators that made 1087HP on the dyno@8200RPM.
68 Cougar XR7 GT street legal, 9.47@144.53, 3603# at the line, 487 HR center oiler, single carb, Jerico 4 speed, 10.5 tires, stock(er) suspension, all steel full interior

482supersnake

  • Guest
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #64 on: October 06, 2016, 09:31:22 PM »
Dang. I thought I would get my heads ported  ;)

There are some cool manifolds on that site. His prices seem reasonable also. To bad the ports aren't a little closer. I wonder how hard it would be to get the molds changed so they would fit on Jay's adapter?

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Blue thunder heads
« Reply #65 on: October 07, 2016, 08:40:54 AM »
It would probably be easier for me to do a custom adapter to fit that intake.  Since I CNC the ports anyway, I can move them wherever I want.  Might have to use the high riser casting instead of the medium riser, and also machining the adapter down somewhat, and maybe the intake also, could be required.  But I'll bet it could work.  Somebody buy one of those things and send it to me for a fit-up LOL!
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC