Author Topic: Interesting ebay auction showing tunnel port intake.  (Read 3440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

482supersnake

  • Guest
Interesting ebay auction showing tunnel port intake.
« on: January 13, 2015, 09:55:04 PM »
Guy has a Ford tunnel port listed for use on a Pontiac RAM AIR V with gasket showing how close the Ford and Pontiac ports are.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/PONTIAC-RAM-AIR-V-FORD-TUNNEL-PORT-INTAKE-2x4-/381112304722?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item58bc104452&vxp=mtr

Would be a lot of work to get the Ford intake to work on the Pontiac but the ports are close.

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Interesting ebay auction showing tunnel port intake.
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2015, 09:59:45 PM »
I know at least one guy who wants to use one of my intake adapters for a tunnel port, plus a Pontiac RamAir V intake manifold, for use on an FE.  The ports are very, very close...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

482supersnake

  • Guest
Re: Interesting ebay auction showing tunnel port intake.
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2015, 10:19:16 PM »
Have you set a 429/460 intake on one of the MR adapters to see how it fit? I think Joe Crain had mentioned that he had used a 429 intake on a PSE adapter before, but i didn't see any pictures.
Scott

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Interesting ebay auction showing tunnel port intake.
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2015, 10:34:50 PM »
I haven't, but the bore spacing on the 385 series is bigger than on the FE, so I would expect a mismatch.  Kind of like the mismatch between the 351C intakes and the FE ports.  The Pontiacs, on the other hand, have a bore spacing that is 4.62" compared to the FE's 4.63".  Its a pretty good match...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

Joe-JDC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1492
  • Truth stands on its own merit.
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting ebay auction showing tunnel port intake.
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2015, 11:49:33 PM »
The mismatch was not the problem with putting a 460 Victor on a PSE, it was the airflow.  Why put a 550cfm manifold on a 320cfm head?  Worse than the Dove spyder at anything below 6000rpm.  It all comes back to having the manifold flow around 120-125% more than the head for a race engine that uses a cast intake.  JMO, but plenum design, runner taper, and angle of entry into head are more important than maximum airflow.  I would much rather have a smaller port continue to flow air faster at higher lifts and water pressure than one that flows a lot of air, but shears over the short turn and loses flow at any lift.  If a port continues to increase airflow above 28" on my flow bench, I will sometimes check it all the way to 48" just to see if it will back-up or go turbulent.  If it does, the shape is wrong somewhere.  Takes a lot of patience to figure out what causes a port to go stagnant or back-up flow, and years of experience.  What looks good does not necessarily work on the engine, or on the flow bench.  JMO, but the more I learn, the less I make adamant statements.  There are always exceptions to what is accepted as "gospel" from the past.   Joe-JDC.
Joe-JDC '70GT-500

482supersnake

  • Guest