Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
FE Technical Forum / Re: More valvetrain issues
« Last post by 1968galaxie on May 26, 2024, 10:17:58 PM »
Rocker geometry is right on. Definitely not coil bind.

I was thinking spring surge (too much distance to coil bind). Surge can cause havoc - and break parts.
2
FE Technical Forum / Re: More valvetrain issues
« Last post by jayb on May 26, 2024, 08:09:53 PM »
Jim, I'd give some consideration to backing off on your spring pressure a little bit.  That cam is not all that radical, maybe drop to 575-600 open,180-200 on the seat?  Might be enough to make a difference, and valve springs are a lot cheaper than a new rocker setup - Jay
3
FE Technical Forum / Re: More valvetrain issues
« Last post by Jim Comet on May 26, 2024, 05:37:31 PM »
Rocker geometry is right on. Definitely not coil bind.
4
FE Technical Forum / Re: More valvetrain issues
« Last post by 1968galaxie on May 26, 2024, 04:58:38 PM »
That is one heck of alot of rpm for the short duration cam.
Not too little valve spring.
Did you verify rocker geometry?
Something is not happy.
What valve spring distance to bind (max net lift to coil bind)?

Cheers
5
FE Technical Forum / Re: More valvetrain issues
« Last post by Jim Comet on May 26, 2024, 04:05:50 PM »
The cam is a solid roller 244/252 @.050 and .640 lift. Shifting at 6600 going through the traps at 6800-6900.
6
FE Technical Forum / Re: More valvetrain issues
« Last post by 1968galaxie on May 26, 2024, 03:42:03 PM »
Ouch!
What SR camshaft specs?
Lobe numbers (I assume Comp Cams solid roller)?
The valve train is certainly not happy.
The bent stud and hammered push rod cup is telling you something.

7
FE Technical Forum / More valvetrain issues
« Last post by Jim Comet on May 26, 2024, 03:29:16 PM »
I took the Comet to Brainerd this weekend with the new motor. We had dyno'd it and it made 540hp. We tried 4 passes with the E85 Carb and could not make full passes due to it running very lean and not wanting to hurt the motor. I then put on my race gas carb and the car responded with a 10.99 @123mph. We went up for our next pass and it ran 11.02 @124mph but on the top end made a funny noise and my boy shut it down. An exhaust push rod had broken the adjusting cup.  Before installing the motor in the car I rechecked the valve lash and retorqued the retaining studs. When I removed the rocker assembly with the broken rocker, I found the ARP stud next to it was slightly bent. By all appearance the adjuster had not backed off and the bent stud next to it still appeared to be holding torque. My assumption is that the 660 open spring pressures are just too much for the stock style T&D setup to handle even with the EZ lock inserts installed in the heads to prevent pulling out. What do you think, I don't have 3500.00 bucks to get the race T&D's this year. would you give it another try with new studs and what I have and hope this was a fluke? Thanks for your thoughts. Jim
8
Private Classifieds / WTB: Ford 3x2 sloped Tri-Power Intake
« Last post by FirstEliminator on May 25, 2024, 09:47:16 PM »
Hi,
   Looking for a Ford, 3x2 Tri-Power intake manifold. Just the manifold. I'd consider an air cleaner and linkage as well.

    No Edelbrock.
   
   I will be in Carlisle All Ford next weekend with cash.
    Send me a message or email to FirstEliminator@aol.com with asking price and condition.

     
9
FE Technical Forum / Re: FE/385 Dampeners
« Last post by frnkeore on May 25, 2024, 07:11:46 PM »
yes,they are.
10
FE Technical Forum / Re: FE/385 Dampeners
« Last post by Stangman on May 25, 2024, 05:34:14 PM »
But why are they less expensive
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10