Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MrRupp

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
31
FE Technical Forum / Re: Iron head question for builders
« on: August 14, 2021, 03:23:14 PM »
Why not just run a lead additive in every tank of fuel. That way you don't have to mess with the head. I did that in my 428 CJ in my 76 F-250 highboy for at least 10 years. Drove it everyday, had no trouble at all. Clint

32
Yep we made it. The Mustang ran ok. The best run was 11:81 @115 mph, that's about 3 tenth slower then our best run. We're pretty sure we have the car WAY over jetted. I guess it's time to get the 1050 dominator on and tune the motor to it. We did run some more timing and I think that helped having the jetting way out of wack. It gave it time to burn all that fuel we were force feeding it.
I'm pretty sure I met your uncle Doug a few years ago at an All Ford Sunday. I'm sure I saw all your family and friends run. It's to bad you couldn't make it, because it was a great day of racing. Well have a good one, can't wait to see your mustang out on the track. Clint

33
Well we finally got the new headers installed and it's just in time for All Ford Day this weekend. It will be the first time we raced this year. All we changed from last years set up is bigger headers and were going to run more timing. Can't wait to see how she runs. Clint

34
Sounds great, come over anytime. I do my running in the mornings. Afternoon is the best time to catch me. We just picked up a 1050 dominator for the mustang, can't wait get that on. Clint

35
mbrunson427, I can't wait to see your Mustang, and I bet she going to be fast. I think we found an oil pan that will work with our headers, we are keeping our fingers crossed. My shop is in Littleton, the name of it is Gorman's Tool Chest. Come down and we can BS about fast FEs. Clint

36
What is it when you pay $1200.00 for custom fit headers and they don't fit. They fit good as long as we don't use the oil pan. Will make them fit, isn't that why you have a welder and a torch? Clint

37
I was thinking we need to be at least 36, but you guy's are thinking more like 38 to 40? Another thing were not sure about is if we have the total advance coming in at the right rpm. It's a never ending quest to go faster. Thanks for all your help it's greatly appreciated. Clint

38
Here's a quick update on the old 79 Foxbody. We finally received the new headers from RCI. They did a fantastic job. We're going get them fitted this weekend, and then send them out to Jet-hot and have them ceramic coated. I been reading some of the old threads, about how much advance we need to run for timing. The way it looks we are not running enough total timing at all. Our initial timing now is 16 and 33 total at 2800 RPM. The heads we are running are C4AE-G. They are ported with 2.125 intakes and 1.71 exhaust. So what I been reading in the threads is cast iron ford heads like more timing. I know in the old days when we did a tune up here in Colorado we always advanced the initial timing 4 to 6 degree's more then what the factory wanted. We don't have access to a dyno, will have to play with it at the track, which opens this weekend. Well that's it for now. Clint

39
Drag Strip Results for FE Powered Vehicles / Re: 79 Foxbody Mustang FE 445
« on: February 24, 2021, 01:01:39 PM »
That sounds great, it's always good to see another FE powered race car. We are very out numbered. People can't believe we got an FE to fit in a Foxbody Mustang, and then when make an 11.5 N/A run. They really take notice. Well mbrunson427 hope to see you this summer tearing up the track. Clint

40
Drag Strip Results for FE Powered Vehicles / Re: 79 Foxbody Mustang FE 445
« on: February 23, 2021, 05:23:27 PM »
Well it's back to work on the Mustang, hopefully will be a little faster this year. Track opens the second week in April, with a two day test and tune. So that gives us around a month and a half to get the car ready. First thing we are doing is upgrading the headers. We're going from 1 3/4 to 2" primaries with 3 1/2 collectors. The other major thing is we want to go with a different torque converter. The one we have now stalls right at 2800 RPM, but the cam we have starts to make power around 3500 RPM. We have a couple of places around here that will build us a converter to work with our combination, all it takes is money. Well that's it for now, I hope everybody stay healthy.Clint

41
FE Technical Forum / Re: cam selection
« on: December 01, 2020, 01:19:44 PM »
Have Brent grind you a cam, you won't regret it. I got one of his cams for our 445 in my race car and it made it a monster.

42
No we don't have a data logger wish we did, so we have to do it old school. It does it when we burn out, but it come out of the hole really strong and we can't feel any miss. It seem like it only does it in the higher rpm, like right when we shift, and when we go through the lights. We kinda think were running out of gas, or maybe a plug breaking down. Will find it this winter I hope. The plus to this season was we drove the car off and on the trailer every race and it was with it's own power. Hopefully next year we will post some time that will be impressive, I no this year was pretty boring. I believe the car has low elevens or maybe a high tens we just got find the right combination. Until next year. Clint

43
Took the Mustang to the track last Wednesday to do some more testing and it is probably the last time we will run it this race season. It ran pretty good, but my buddy that was running the car said he could feel something breaking down on the top end. We got 4 runs in and the best was 11.66@ 115mph. We only had 1 run that we won't talk about, all the rest were with in a tenth of each other. One racer challenge us to a grudge race so we said sure. It was a 64 Ford F-100 short bed 2wd with a stroke 351w with efi. It runs consistent low 12s, so realistically we should clean his clock. He got us out of the hole about a half car, but we ran him down at the other to win the race. We thought that's a good note to end the season on. We did have few racer come over to the car and could not believe we running an FE. They were very impressed and amazed on how well it fits and runs. Well that's it for this year, hopefully will be faster next so year I can post some impressive numbers. We do have some thing were going change on the car, that hopefully will make her faster or not. Clint

44
Drag Strip Results for FE Powered Vehicles / Re: '64 Custom
« on: September 17, 2020, 11:35:12 AM »
Those are two very cool stories and two of my favorite engines. Thanks for sharing. Clint

45
Well we finally got the Trick Flow track heat intake manifold installed on the 445. Took the car to the track yesterday and we really weren't sure how the intake would change things. We did jet the car up, from 87s square to 94s. When we were running the Holley Street Dominator we had 92s for jetting and seemed about right the plugs look really good. We don't have an 02 sensor so we have to do it the old fashion way by reading the plugs. When we had the Cobra Jet intake on we had lots of low end and not so much on the top end. The Dominator intake was pretty good all the way through the RPM range. Now the Trick Flow intake seems to give plenty of low end. We Foot brake launch at 3000 which is a little low for our cam, and we were getting some wheel spin coming out of the hole. the top end was great the car pulled hard all the way through the traps. We're pretty sure we founds some horse power now we just need to figure how to get it to the ground. The best run out of 3 was 11.77 @ 114 which is off our best by 2 tenths, but we're sure there's more to be found. Stay tuned. Clint

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5