Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - jimeast

Pages: [1] 2
1
Private Classifieds / WTB: Blue Thunder MR Intake
« on: March 18, 2022, 04:47:32 PM »
Might be unobtanium, but...  If someone has a Blue Thunder MR Intake they don't need, let me know. 

2
Is there a consensus on whether the engine should be painted after assembly or at the components stage before assembly?

3
I got a call from the shop that's balancing a Scat 2.25 stroker crank and rods I picked up yrs ago.  It's for a 482 stroker.

Rods: Scat H-Beam 6.7"  (not sure of the weight)
Crank: Scat 2.25 stroker
Pistons.  Lightweight from Blair P.

The shop is concerned they will need to use around 3 slugs of mallory and it seems excessive to them.  Is it typical to need this much mallory in a scat stroker? 

*** I thought this info as I learn it might be helpful in future searches.
***EDITED After Barry's Comments: 
***Scat 6.7 H-Beam Connecting Rod: Wt 815gm; Big End: 567gm; Small End: 248gm
***Scat 6.7 I-Beam Connecting Rod:  Wt 771gm; Big End: 545gm; Small End: 226gm (Ross's data from below post)

4
Does anyone have pushrod length data from a build using Barry's Felony heads, OEM non-adjustable rockers and stands, and Morel 5325 hydraulic rollers.  I need to order an adjustable pushrod from Smith Brothers to use to determine pushrod length (at zero lash)  for my build. The Smith Adjuster offered only has .250 range and ideally I can order one that's provides 1/8" adjustment in each direction.

I thought these checker pushrods would have more range, but Smith is the only option I found to get a 3/8 ball on one end and a 5/16 ball on the other.  I'm open to alternate suggestions.

5
FE Technical Forum / Jet suggestions for Carb Re-build
« on: June 17, 2020, 01:28:03 PM »
As mentioned in a previous post, I plan on using a 3310-1 Holley 780cfm in a 482 stroker rebuild, and would like feedback on starting point for Jets and Power Valves.  I know the jets and power valves are more likely than not to change during tuning, but am curious if someone has done a similar build and can suggest a starting point for the jets and power valves to use in the rebuild.  The engine is for a '67 Mustang Convertible

Note:  The 3310-1 has a power valve in both the primary and secondary metering block.

Mustangtek list a number of 780CFM carbs for various engine combos, Primary jets run, 69,70, or 71;  Secondary jets 83.  Power valve 65 or 85 (no listings for 3310-1 with two power valves) 

Engine Build:
Block:  427 stroked to 482
Compression Ratio: 10:1
Heads: Mildly messaged Felony heads by Blair Patrick
Intake:  Blue Thunder MR
CAM: Hyd Roller, Lift .520, Duration 276 total, .224 at .05 (Symmetric)
Exhaust:  Will use CJ cast iron, or FPA headers

6
FE Technical Forum / Carb for 482 stroker street build
« on: June 13, 2020, 09:25:13 AM »
I've been doing a little work on my long term project, a 482 stroker to drop in my '67 Mustang convertible with a 4 speed manual transmission.  It's being built for the street, power coming in low, and starting to run out of steam somewhere north of 5,000 RPM, maybe up to 5,500?  Yrs ago on a lark I picked up a used 3310-1 (Holley 780 cfm) carb.   It seems like it's a nice size for a street motor of this size, but...  The linkages might be for a GM auto transmission, and it needs rebuilt, but the finish is still very nice, better than most older carbs I see.  I plan on using a Blue Thunder MR intake. 

Any advice on how to determine if this carb makes sense or if I'm pushing on rope?

7
FE Technical Forum / Adjustable Pushrod Tool
« on: August 15, 2017, 03:39:06 PM »
I'm collecting several tools for my build. I will need to get an adjustable pushrod tool to specify the pushrod size(s). Hydraulic Roller with Morel Roller Lifters. Can anyone suggest an adjustable pushrod or tool that worked for them.

8
Member Projects / '67 Mustang Convertible Swapping 390 for 427 Stroker
« on: August 13, 2017, 11:39:12 AM »
Probably a thread that will last years...

I have a '67 convertible GTA 390.  A/C, P/S, Power disc/drum brakes, Thermactor, C6, Deluxe Interior.  I have not driven in years due to engine trouble, transmission trouble, radiator trouble, brake trouble, steering trouble, suspension trouble etc...  It's a CA car that might be a legitimate 38k mileage car (I have not been able to make a decision one way or another as I dig into it, if I think the mileage is original.  I think it was wrecked in some way and sat for many years, and then put through a restoration of sorts in the early 90's.  Engine is correct date code, but has been out & apart)

At first I was going to freshen up the 390 and stroke it to 445 and use the original heads.  I got a lot of flack for that idea, and got carried away one weekend and purchased a set of Survival Heads from Blair Patrick that he worked over a bit.  Come to find out Blair could have set up the 390 heads the way I imagined for a reasonable price, but the survival heads were already purchased.
 
The block I've decided to use is a late service block side oiler that sat in the Collier's Collection's GT40 for many years before they realized it should have a properly date coded block.  It is in very good shape, hardly used, but some questionable factory machining and assembly work.  I've had it tucked away for 10 years or so. 

The block has just been machined by my local shop and I’m trying to get everything ordered to balance the rotating assembly in the next week or so.

I'm shooting for a 10:1 Comp ratio and a hydraulic roller with fairly low lift that uses factory non-adjustable rockers.  I'd like a Blue Thunder intake with a 735 or 780 carb on it, but I also get a little carried away with the idea of a Blue Thunder 8v with a set of 600s on top

I'm switching the transmission to a toploader, and have many of the parts needed.  It's a long list of parts and I still need more.  I'm using a McLeod RST Clutch and steel flywheel.  I have a new in the box Romac 427 balancer I've had for 10 yrs or so that I'll use.  I was going to use an original 427 balancer, but the shop talked me out of it.  (One less component to send out and get rebuilt)

More to come.


9
FE Technical Forum / For Jay: Questions: The Great Intake Comparo
« on: September 28, 2015, 08:32:23 AM »
Jay, I have the book, extremely helpful.

I have a 390 stroker  to build and a 427 block that will be built after the 390.  I'm curious about the idling conditions and street-ability of the 390 stroker and 427 (non-stroker) dyno mules you built.  I suspect the cams you used are a little too aggressive for most street rides, but thought I'd ask.  And if you have any data, I'd be curious about the general vacuum conditions these two dyno mules delivered.

10
FE Technical Forum / Standard Abrasives Porting Kit
« on: August 30, 2015, 10:38:10 PM »
Will this kit be adequate for porting a set of cast iron heads.  I also have a few carbide cutters, but nothing like the selection of cartridge rolls in this kit.

http://www.amazon.com/Standard-Abrasives-260001-Deluxe-Porting/dp/B0015DQH2Q

11
FE Technical Forum / Head Gasket for 390-445 Build
« on: August 17, 2015, 08:21:24 AM »
I'm in the early stages of a 445 build.  I'm using C6AE-R heads iron heads.  My question is around the head gasket.  The chambers of the C6AE-R heads open up slightly more than 4.080 in several places and the cylinder bores will have chamfers that are more than 4.080 in diameter at the top.  Assuming a zero-deck, Is there anything to consider when you have a situation where the gasket bore diameter is slightly smaller in some places than the chamber diameter or chamfer diameter on the bores?

Also, it looks like for 4.08 bore diameter, Cometic is the only choice in 4.08 that comes up on Summit.  Any other head gasket choices I should consider?

12
FE Technical Forum / Valve Stem Location in C6AE-R Head
« on: July 19, 2015, 01:33:35 PM »
Does anyone have some dimensional information on the location of the Valve Stem center or plane with respect to the chamber of the C6AE-R heads.  I have read that the valves are 2" apart, but do not see any data on where the intake or exhaust is located with respect to the center plane of the chamber  I can measure this to a degree of accuracy, but would like exact info if available.  The "Shoe" drawings I have are for a MR head which have a longer valve spread 

13
FE Technical Forum / 16 Hole pattern for CJ Exhaust
« on: June 05, 2015, 04:16:43 PM »
I have a set of C6AE-R heads with eight exhaust flange bolts.  I would like to drill for a 16 bolt CJ exhaust pattern.  Does anyone have a drawing or a sketch showing the bolt hole pattern with dimensions? 


14
FE Technical Forum / FE Build Thoughts
« on: May 20, 2015, 12:35:48 PM »
I'm starting to collect parts for a build I am slowly working towards and thought I'd share my thoughts and see if anyone has suggestions on the parts.

I have a running 390 that I plan on stroking;

I have the following parts;

Running 390 engine
Stroker Crank and Rods
CJ Intake
C6AE-R bare heads

My current thoughts are to
1) Get the heads built with CJ valves, pocket port and a minimal cleanup of the ports
2) Set the compression around 10:1 with forged pistons
3) Acquire a set of CJ exhaust manifolds
4) Acquire a CJ 735 Carb or similar
5) Acquire a Solid Comp 282s Cam and associated parts
6) Acquire stock type adjustable rocker setup

Regarding the CAM, I plan on getting a little advice from a cam grinder when I'm ready to buy the CAM, I'll have the heads done by then, but it seems like the 282s is a pretty standard recipe for a 445 build, so out of the selection of solid grinds in catalogs, it seems like a good starting point

I plan on using a 3.25"1 rear end, it's currently 3.00:1
My current transmission is a C-6, but I've collected most of the parts needed for a toploader conversion.
Exhaust will be 2.25 stock CJ or 2.5" that is visually similar to the stock setup if possible.

The engine is for a '67 Mustang convertible that will be street only.  Any strong opinions on a better way to go for a fun very responsive, but drivable street ride would be appreciated. 
 


15
FE Technical Forum / Vacuum and CAM selection in 445 build
« on: May 15, 2015, 07:49:41 AM »
I'm pondering a 445 build with my 390.  It will be for a street car, 67 Mustang Convertible.  I'ts a fairly standard build, 4.25 stroke. 10:1 comp, C6AE-R heads (or stock C7 GT heads) with CJ size valves, pocket port and good valve job.  CJ intake, carb and exhaust manifolds with a 2-1/4 or 2-1/2 stock fitting exhaust.  Transmission is a C6, (I'm collecting parts for a toploader conversion).  The car has power brakes, AC, PS.  It has a 3:0 open differential now.  I plan on changing to a 3.25:1 trac-loc.   

It seems like with this combination, the biggest consideration regarding cam selection is to end up with a responsive engine that revs well from 1,500RPM to as close to 6,000RPM as possible and holds good vacuum at low RPM for the brakes, automatic transmission, etc...

I am thinking about using a solid lifter cam like the 282s from comp.  Any cam specs to consider for vacuum?  I've read that for good vacuum, staying below 220 exhaust duration at .05 lift is a good rule of thumb, but I'm not sure if this holds as the cubic inches grow.

Does anyone have experience with a similar build and resulting vacuum?  Ideally I'll end up with a very responsive fun ride with vacuum enough for the brakes, automatic transmission, etc... 

Pages: [1] 2