Author Topic: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s  (Read 19115 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« on: October 22, 2013, 09:55:09 AM »
Been lurking for a while – figured it was time to join.  New to FE’s but a lifetime hotrodder.  Currently driving a ’60 f-100 with a stone stock ’61 T-bird 390/COM combo.  Last winter I participated in my first FE build – a 428 PI for a friends ’67 GT 500. What a thrill to work on that car, it had been totally restored some time ago, but he sucked a nut from an air cleaner stud and ruined a cylinder wall…..nothing fancy on the build, modern CJ replacement cam, custom flat top pistons, “stock” dual quad intake.  But this motor made me a believer in FE Power – the car goes like a raped ape and the “power band” is immense.

Now onto my proposed build/questions. Note, I want this to be as much of an “old school” type build as possible.  It will be used “for fun” in a lightweight, good handeling car (still sorting this out).  The block is an early ’65 center oiler fresh from the machine shop, blueprinted and finished at a 4.25” bore – this is as far as I’ve gotten.

I have a freshly ground 3.5” stroke 352 crank and “long” factory rods – Am I absolutely nuts for thinking about using them with stock dimension (compression height) 427 wiseco pistons (at “0” deck)?  How strong are these rods (with arp bolts)? Was this combo ever used “back in the day” for any class racing or high RPM applications?  How high would you spin the motor with this combo (everything checked, balanced, etc)?  Should I just use a 390 crank and scat or eagle rods? 428 crank? Or get a 4.25 stroker kit like everyone else?

Heads – To start, I’m thinking garden variety low risers with a 1.66 ex valve and a 2.19 intake.  How much compression do I need to run to make the 1.66 valve “work” as opposed to a 1.71?  10:1? 11:1? 12:1?....Obviously, the heads would also be ported.  Do the chambers need to be opened up to unshroud the larger valves? No – I will not buy edelbrock heads.

Intake (I know – buy the book) but what do you think – perf RPM, streetmaster, victor, 2x4? I assume port matching is mandatory.

Camshaft – 294s? bigger? Smaller?

I know – tons of questions in a marathon post from a “newbie” – Please be easy on me – Thanks - Mike

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4828
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2013, 11:57:55 AM »
Hi Mike,

I personally wouldn't use the "long" rods.  I'm not much of a fan of using factory rods at all, especially with higher horsepower builds, but the 352 rods are very spindly in comparison to other FE rods.   

On another note, I don't see the 427 pistons working with this combination.  Typical 427 piston compression height, meant to be used with a 3.780" stroke and a 6.490" rod is about 1.775-1.780".  To use a 352 crank and a 352/360 rod, you would need a piston roughly around 1.830"-1.850" compression height to get to zero deck.

Now, I'm not going to rain on your parade and say don't do it, but if I were going to use this combination, I would find another rod and a custom piston.  I like the 4.125/4.250 stroke motors as well as everybody else, but sometimes it's refreshing to see something that's more factory-ish.

If you're interested in a factory build with LR heads and a big cam, you can look at my thread that I posted a few weeks ago about some old school iron combos. 

Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2013, 11:59:56 AM »
Welcome to the forum, Mike.  You've got a great start with that block.  First suggestion:  Go with the stroker kit, like everybody else  ;D  There is a reason they are popular.  Number 1, you aren't using old parts.  Eventually old, used parts will fail.  Number 2, the BBC bearings in the stroker kits are wider and smaller in diameter than stock FE bearings, giving you more load surface and less bearing speed at a given RPM.  Number 3, cubic inches rule, especially on the street.  If you think your friends 428 has an immense powerband, wait 'til you feel a 482" FE powerband.  Number 4, a 4.25" stroker combination is easily capable of 7000 RPM, and will pull hard all the way there.  If you are trying to build a real winder, a shorter stroke crank will let you go higher, but you'll still be down on power because of fewer cubes.

On the heads, the 1.66 valve will work fine, but I guess I'm not sure why you don't want to go with the 1.71.  That valve would be a better match for your 2.19 intake.  You should be able to get 300 cfm on the intake side with those heads, making over 600 HP do-able with this combination.  You should not have to open up the low riser chambers much, if at all, to get that flow number.

I would go with a 2X4 intake, probably the medium riser dual plane 2X4 manifold if you can find one (factory or Blue Thunder; they both perform about the same).  And you will want a bigger cam than a 294S; more cubic inches will require more camshaft.  I would consider a roller cam, like a Comp 308R or maybe a hydraulic roller, although the hydraulic roller probably won't let you go to 7000 RPM.

There, I've just spent all your money for you  ;D  600 HP, here we come...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4828
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2013, 12:28:45 PM »
All good points....

The availability of BBC parts is much cheaper.   Even a Scat BBC H-beam rod compared to a Scat FE H-beam rod is much cheaper.  I will say this, on many "factory" builds, I will turn the rod journals down to a 2.200" journal because of the reasons that Jay outlined. 

Still nothing wrong with a factory build though, if your heart so desires...
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2013, 01:24:12 PM »
Wow – thanks for the thoughts.  I hadn’t really “done the math” on the deck height – I knew it would be close – I have to look at where my block ended up.  As far as the rods are concerned, I think I knew the answer before I asked the question.  The BBC rods do intrigue me though – are any modifications to the rods themselves necessary? Is the profile the same? Anything special need to be done to the crank when it’s turned (fillet, chamfer oil holes, etc)?  I assume since I would be getting custom pistons the pin size is not a problem.  My freshly turned 352 crank actually came out of a rebuilt short block that was never fired but sat for a long time – so indexing it and cutting it to the BBC journals wouldn’t be a problem.  I guess my attraction to the 427 piston/352 crank and rods was that if I didn’t like it I only had to change the rods and crank to get back to a “real” 427…..If I go the BBC/custom piston route, I better like it.  As far as the exhaust valve goes, I was under the assumption that the higher the compression ratio, the less the exhaust port/valve size mattered as it had ample help to evacuate the cylinder – If there are no issues going 2.19/1.71 in the LR heads I’ll probably just do that. As for the heads, are the early “closed” chambers (like a 406 tri-power head) better (as far as flow and “swirl”) than the typical “squared off” 71-76cc chambers?  I think it would be fun to put this combo together and see how it does on the Dyno.

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4828
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2013, 01:58:54 PM »
The crank journal has to be turned down and widened both....depending on your relationship with your crank grinder, it can get expensive.  No mods to the rods are necessary and you just get a piston with a .990" pin bore instead of a .975".

The exhaust valve size really depends on what you're needing the heads to do as far as flow more so than the compression ratio.  The camshaft also dictates a lot of exhaust events, as the overlap will help the exhaust scavenge the intake charge.

Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

garyv

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2013, 02:10:28 PM »
You have come to the right place to get honest opinions from guys that live and breathe FE's.
Take their advice and you will be a happy man.
Sounds like you have a plan in mind. just remember there is more than one way to skin a cat.
As Jay said, you can go the stroker route and get there easier if you are looking for a specific HP/Tq.
You could run a solid flat tappet cam which will let you turn some RPM's.
could also go solid roller cam but that is lot more expensive.
stay away from stock rods. just not worth the risk.
You could still use 428 crank and use aftermarket rods if you wanted. that will give you 454 cubes.
this is still an old school stroke.
make sure your heads have a good valve job done on them and the proper springs to match the cam.
Don't skimp on cheap rockers such as the pro comp stuff.
If you don't know just ask.  Plenty of good help just a click away.
good luck
garyv


« Last Edit: October 22, 2013, 03:50:50 PM by garyv »

afret

  • Guest
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2013, 06:06:21 PM »
You might consider having the lifter oil passages drilled in your block in case you decided to go with a hydraulic roller or allow pressure oiling to solid rollers if you ever decide to go this way.

bn69stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2013, 03:38:28 PM »
Welcome to the forum , take my advice read listen and learn from all of these guy s . Spend your money on new parts as Jay said as well as everybody else , build a 482 with a solid valve train and you will be a happy camper .
69 mach 1 , 428 C J  Blue Oval Performance BBM heads -T@D rocker s- Blue thunder intake - Comp hydr roller - MSD ignition - FPA headers- Holley 850 hp double pumper - TKO 600 - 9 inch 3.89 Detroit Locker . ride tech coil over conversion - power rack @ pinoin steering - 13 inch drilled @ slotted 4 wheel disc brakes ..

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2013, 10:55:57 AM »
Thanks again for all the input - after crunching the numbers on the combination as well as the cost , and being honest with myself about how I'm gonna use it, I've decided to go with a stock (3.78") cast crank and aftermarket stock dimension rods and flat top pistons - My focus will be on quality parts and machine work - I will keep this thread updated as I make progress.

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2013, 11:36:34 AM »
Well - I'm moving along on this build and need some more input...Ended up stock stroke with flat-tops .015 in the hole, plan to use fel-pro head gaskets.  Stock cobra jet heads (have not cc'd them yet).  I am assuming I will end up in the 10.25-10.5:1 range.  This will be a "play" motor that I want to run well on pump gas in a 3200lb vehicle with a 3000rpm stall c6 and anywhere from 3.70 to 4.30 gears (have 2 chucks) I know this won't be a "grunt down low" type of set up - I'm perfectly happy making power between 3000-6500rpm. Now onto my question....

I have a solid cam with the following specs - 244 duration at .050, 114 intake centerline, 114 lobe separation, Exhaust opens 56 BBDC and Closes 8 ATDC Intake opens 8 BTDC and closes 56 ABDC  Would you use this cam? - straight up? Advanced?

Any input on this set up would be greatly appreciated - MERRY CHRISTMAS

plovett

  • Guest
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #11 on: December 25, 2013, 10:59:50 AM »
Just to make sure I have it right.  You are at 4.25" by 3.50" for 397 cubic inches?

Some thoughts:

I think your compression ratio will be a bit lower unless the heads have been milled a fair amount.  I come up with about 9.9:1 with a 72 cc chamber.  I believe stock CJ's are supposed to be in the 72-76cc range.  I'm assuming your flat tops have some 5-6cc valve reliefs?

Maybe you could get some steel shim head gaskets to up the compression some.  Mr. Gasket makes some.  I'm not sure what their compressed thickness is.  They are sometimes advertised as 0.20" thick and sometimes as 0.032" thick if I remember correctly.  I think I emailed them a long time ago and they told me the larger figure was correct.  It'd be worth checking into.  0.032" plus the 0.015" your pistons are in the hole would give a .047" quench height.  That would be close to ideal in my opinion.  It would also bump the compression ratio about a quarter point.

Cam.  Do you know the advertised duration spec's?  Lift?  It has a wide lobe separation at 114.  For a hotrod type motor I think I'd want a tighter lobe separation for more mid to mid-high range power.  The wide lobe separation should give you a better idle and a wider overall power band.  I think a tighter LSA should concentrate the power in the middle of the power band better which is good, in my opinion.  I'd rather see something like a 108-110 degree LSA.   Considering the relatively small cubic inches I'd install the cam advanced a bit.  Maybe 4-8 degrees advanced from straight up. 

Are you still going to get some port work done on the heads?  Well worth it in my opinion.  I'd get them pocket ported and some mild port work. 

Considering the cubic inches and weight of the vehicle I'd lean toward the lower (4.30) gearing.  3200 lb is not very heavy, but I'd still err on the side of lower gearing.  Closer to 4.30 than 3.70.

JMO,

paulie

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #12 on: December 25, 2013, 11:52:01 AM »
I'm sorry - we went back and fourth a bit on this one - its stock 427 stroke 3.78 - the advertised duration is 296

plovett

  • Guest
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #13 on: December 25, 2013, 12:30:41 PM »
Ah, that makes the compression ratio range you mentioned make sense.  That's good. 

As for the cam I think it'll work fine and since you're at 429 cubic inches I wouldn't be worried about using a little higher gearing, like the 3.70's instead of 4.30's. 

Personally I still think you'd be better off with a tighter lobe separation unless you are looking for a smooth idle.  If you use the one you have I still think a "standard" advance of around 4 degrees past straight up would be good.  That is install it on a 110 degree intake centerline.  You could advance it a bit more than that.  I wouldn't advance it less than 4 degrees. 

Also check to see if some advance is ground in to the cam.  I mean I wouldn't just advance it 4 degrees without checking where it's at when installed straight up.  Degreeing the cam is the only way to see exactly where its at.

And I'm still for port work on the heads.

JMO,

paulie
« Last Edit: December 25, 2013, 01:00:09 PM by plovett »

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4461
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #14 on: December 25, 2013, 04:58:09 PM »
Like Paulie said, with 114 LSA that cam will give a pretty smooth idle, even for the duration. Actually sounds like it would be a pretty good choice for a 'no hassles' cam that can be driven often or even daily if you chose to. Especially with the 3.70 gears. The 4.30 gears will KILL mileage and cruise speed unless you have some really tall tires....or just don't care. The cam will pretty much be done making power by 6000 though I'm guessing. Although it should run to 6500 without problems given the right springs and other valvetrain components.

Unless you are wanting to spend some serious money, or have the knowledge to do it yourself, I would leave the heads alone. CJ heads are good heads in factory form. Maybe gasket match and just clean up the transition from bowl to seat.....IF you are careful. It's easy to screw things up if you're not sure what you're doing.

Sounds to me like you are moving in the right direction and making good choices. Should be a good running engine when you're done.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2014, 02:55:23 PM »
My felpro head gaskets are 8554PT. Will these seal with a 4.25 bore? Also, will my quench be too far off (pistons .015 in the hole) for a total of .065+? Thinking about MLS gaskets at .027 for .042 total.....So the question is will 10.8:1 static compression with a .42 quench be ok on pump gas (93 octane E10) with the cam I have? If not can you suggest a cam that may work OR is 10.25:1 with a .065 quench with my current cam ok on the same pump gas? Any other gasket/quench suggestions?

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2014, 07:40:15 AM »
I'd go with the thinner head gaskets if at all possible, to optimize the quench distance.  Do you have the advertised intake duration spec for your cam?  You need the advertised number (not duration @ .050") to do a DCR calculation and determine where the cam should be installed for running on pump gas.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2014, 07:45:49 AM »
I had listid the valve timing specs (open/close) in an earlier post - the advertized duration is 296

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2014, 08:02:11 AM »
Sorry I missed that.  Assuming that with your combustion chamber volume and piston dome volume that your 10.8:1 static compression ratio number is correct, I get a dynamic compression ratio of 7.6:1 with the cam intake centerline at 110 (4 degrees advanced with your 114 LSA).  That is low for DCR.  There is no problem running on pump gas at that DCR, but you'll be leaving some power on the table.  If you are going to stick with that cam I'd advance it quite a bit more, to a 104 intake centerline.  That would get you to a DCR of about 8.1:1, which should still be fine with cast iron heads and pump gas, and should pick up some power over the 110 ICL.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

HolmanMoodyStroppeVet

  • Guest
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2014, 04:07:32 PM »
If you 'didn't do it', then who did? And were there any witnesses? Ha Ha

I wish I had more time to read all of this sage wisdom, and good advice, so I plan to be here more often.  This 'other' forum has a few really rude and abrasive people. Many fine minds too, regardless..

OK, we built a whole bunch of 427s for Ford's race team back when and since, and I have a different take. Just to expand the analysis. We have also built hundreds and hundreds of high end street rods for top vendors so the goal comes to mind.

I want you to decide what we are doing, and where we are doing it.

I want to know if we are racing, bracket racing for a purse, racing non professionally, street cruising, or what.

I want to know how hard she will be used, and how we might build in some latitude into your first design, to win or be real reliable, fun, efficient should you add power to the first build.  I need a target. 

You don't have a car,,,,I like light cars a lot, I like cars with down force if we get serious, I like a rigid platform, a safe car, but I love them all. Let's set some goal.

I want to know if we can use race gas, a blower, injection, or need pump gas too. Can we use Nitrous ?  Adding some simple juice, and a secondary fuel system for it, nozzles and so on, is such cheap horsepower.

Is this a auto trans build, just a good old tough C6, or a built c4 with a trans brake, a 4 speed, 5 speed,B&J,   Lenco...multi disc clutch, slipper clutch deal,lets chat more along the way

Then, we can plan a race engine, or a street strip engine, or a cruiser that just gets punched once in a while on pump gas.  Or a pump gas engine that gets nailed more than not...ha ha !

Will you be spending the money to outfit an engine room with dial indicators, bore gages,mics,precision tools,solvent,air,lights,a rod vise,head stands, etc?

If yes, great, and you can amortize that cost, over future builds.

I love a real 427, which was born of racing, for racing, in original form if the goal is authenticity and the original sound, feel and power in some cases.

Real Ford crank, heads and so on.  I love the SOHC heads,High Risers and Tunnel Ports. We raced a bunch of them and they are worth the money.  We raced heads that had huge amounts of time and R&D, and still do.  You might want to try this art as well, why not.  I am big on using great heads.

I really am no huge fan of low riser heads unless it is a heavy car, low RPM compared to a race piece, or if they get well ported, relieved, bigger valves and other tricks.  We swapped a LOT of real medium riser heads, or CJ heads, improved, for low riser heads.  They have their place, like oval port heads on a Rat....if high low end torque is a goal, for example, a jet boat pulling skier out of the water,or a tall geared, heavy car with a big rear seat, lots of glass and so on.  I'd stroke it more times than not.

We stroked so many 427s, and used special spec TRW forgings, many that we finished, TRW said that they added the 427/428 crank slugs into their performance catalog, way back.  We had probably ordered 100 sets by then....and more and more guys began to develop that combo.

We did a lot of billet strokers too, longer Carillo or Crower rods, or aluminum rods for the drags.  Venolia,Forged True, Arias and others helped a lot to lighten what we needed.  We lightened everything, including new SK rods and cranks.

My personal 427 has 2 1/4 inch valves and we sometimes raced a little bigger.  I was kind of raised in the Spin to Win camp, ie, use awesome heads and RPM to post the ponies if the class or race can be won this way.

A 427 came to play, but you can build it for street gas....let her spin I'd say.  Aluminum heads can help you build more static compression there, just a bit, and save a lot of weight, they have hard seats, and better port designs.  I think about Shelby Cobra style builds here, for a second generation use for example.  Stainless roller rockers, SCAT crank,rods,Arias,Mahle or Diamond pistons.  Spec cam for the exact goal and gas. Single 4V quite often.

For all we know, mileage may be a factor....

We were running 427s over 14.5 to 1 in the 60s, today, you can race a lot more.  A modern race engine, like these awesome Super Stockers, or Nostalgia Bolts, A/FXs and such, almost cackle on the return road, like blown cars from back when.   Love it.  Look into how the current bad boys go together for Franken Fuel...bearing oxygen.....like Nitro does.  You had to know tricks to make 14.5 live, 12.5 was more the norm, today, guys are in the 17 to 1 range on some types of race cars,which need much less advance, and have a small, fast burn chamber, relocated plug, valves and so on.

We flew for Dyno Don in match race form, later, like that, based on a big 385 based Ford big block, that Pro Stock SVO block,jesel belt, plate rockers,huge lift cam, crank trigger, dry sump, monstor heads by a big big name. and so on. Big inches.

I am working on an 8 second SOHC that has close to 14 to 1, that is an original engine done by part of the team I knew helping Dyno Don.  The tricks in there, are many tricks Don, us, and others figured out way back when. The heads there allow you a lot of latitude to spin it way up and make power too. And this is not a super light car.  We have a better bullet going together for grudge racing basically

Until you have a car, and a defined goal, I'd say, get the car and then design the power band, with the chassis, and class in mind

Once you get farther along, I want you to email my pal Blair Patrick as well. He has a lot of parts, combos,cams, and tricks to get you racing if we go there. And you will never meet a nicer or brighter racer who has a nice stack of Trophies.  He has fine character as well.

I'd say, you are young, energetic, find a real light door car, tubbed, motor plate maybe, roll cage, fuel cell, certified maybe, or not.

I am helping a new team, resurrect one of Don's cars, the 70-71 Maverick Pro Stocks, with the SOHC's. My close friend was his crew chief then, we built a lot together too.

Suggestion. You want to drive a bunch of Ford fans nuts, show up in a replica of his Maverick Pro Stock and do a nice burnout in 3rd.  I will pledge to help a legitimate re do. somehow, as time allows. Out of repsect for a close friend.

Build a race engine, and get the best heads you can find. High Risers maybe. Or the Blue Thunder High Risers.  Make sure the valve centerlines are for a 427, not 390. Consider getting raw heads, to move the valves too.

Find a tunnel Wedge intake....and we'll chat

If you decide on a repro Cobra maybe...we will proceed a lot differently. We raced with those cool cats too.  If you get into club racing sports car Cobra style, we may go single 4, 11 ish to 1, and heads like a current Shelby, light, and strong, flow good for torque off the corner, high velocity for uses unique to a Sports car, not a drag car,etc.

If you go for a nice big Ford, heavy hitter, we may do a different combo again, big inches, and so on. Maybe go over square on the bore to Stroke ratio. Maybe send the low riser heads to a pro for bigger valves,relieving,porting,hard seats,and such.

If you do what we have done a lot.....find the very very lightest car...like a T Bucket (Raced them on blown Nitro), or a Street Rod ( Raced many many and lived to laugh about it) like a 32 Ford 3 or 5 window, or 33-4  3 window, I might say less stroke, no need to hit the tire so hard,or,have to dead hook a gorilla. Some light cars like RPM not brute low end torque, to hook on some tracks.

You can build a 32 Roadster, or Coupe, with a nice FE, go to Bonneville, and probably work your way into the 200 MPH Club, and that, is an honor. Need to know the ropes and pay your dues. Ford set a lot of records there too.

Look, we have gone about 250 MPH with 397 inches, blown on fuel of course, but, we spin those close to 10,000 RPM out the back door.

You can get into the 5s, with a small block at about the same cubes.

The Champion Speed shop car won the Hot Rod Runion, slayed a list of 426 Chryslers, 417 Donovans and 392 Hemi's...so...even a small block can turn the earth if done right.  Or explode enough to need a bubble canopy.....lol.  What cool guys.

We tend toward an engine that can handle high RPM for many builds, so don't rule out the stock stroke immediately, in my humble opinion.

IF this is just a slap it together, minimum cost deal, I also would save the 352 rods for a 352. 

A iron 390 crank has the same stroke as a 427 and will take a lot more power, and live fine, than what some magazine guys, who can be less than the last word...LOL   have preached for decades, in many builds. Get a better dampner.

Better rods are cheap now, as are lighter, stronger pistons and pins.

You said your block is fresh, 017 over.  We hone to the finished bore size, last. Only after we mic the pistons we are using. So now, you just need to carefully mic the bores, dial bore gage them, then call out your dimension to the piston maker. Issue there is, who's standards match yours.  You used a head plate, so, you may want to measure, clamped down of course, then,get a piston half a thou bigger, then select fit them with a light finish hone. If you get real  serious.

And please, use Barry Robotnick and Brent for help too.  Get Barry's book for a lot of info. I respect them all a lot and trust them implicitly.  I only build for our private shop, and we have close to 200 cars now, many are race cars for fun runs, all done in house, and fusy fuss stuff together for race teams I am helping, or old pals.  Or pretty women. Ha Ha....

If you want to build a retro Talladega or Daytona style beast, email the older guys here, for a trick or two,,,,for the fun of it.....

OK..

You promise me just one thing....

Have fun and stand on the gas !!!

Lunch is over...LOL





« Last Edit: April 01, 2014, 06:01:32 PM by HolmanMoodyStroppeVet »

Ididntdoit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: New Guy Intro and 427 Build ?'s
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2014, 02:01:25 PM »
OK - here's how things ended up - 4.25x3.78 .042 quench 11:1 static compression - stock cj heads - 1966 PI intake - 3310 - Faron set up the dist (curve and pertronics) - the cam is the aformentioned general kinetics (loose copy of the AA cam) it is .525 lift 296adv 244@.050 114lsa installed on a 106ICL - exhaust is open non restrictive headers - so the question is....how much hp? 425? at what rpm? torque? - gear up those keyboard dynos for me.......