Author Topic: Throwback Thursday - Cammer  (Read 2876 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

thatdarncat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
    • View Profile
Throwback Thursday - Cammer
« on: August 14, 2014, 12:47:47 AM »
Photo from Phil Burgess weekly column on NHRA.com submitted by a reader. Nice closeup from 1968 of Connie Kallitta's Cammer powered dragster.

Kevin Rolph

1967 Cougar Drag Car ( under constuction )
1966 7 litre Galaxie
1966 Country Squire 390
1966 Cyclone GT 390
1968 Torino GT 390
1972 Gran Torino wagon
1978 Lincoln Mk V

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7413
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Throwback Thursday - Cammer
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2014, 07:12:01 AM »
"Throwback Thursday" LOL!  Great picture, Kevin. 
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

cobracammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1165
    • View Profile
Re: Throwback Thursday - Cammer
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2014, 08:40:45 AM »
Yea that's awesome.....  Love the Roots blower
Jason
2005 Saleen S281 (427 SOHC 2 X 4 EFI swap), T56 Magnum XL 6 speed, 9" Currie rear with 3.89 Gears

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Throwback Thursday - Cammer
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2014, 09:01:49 AM »
Cool! But, take a close look at the blower case. It's a Pete Robinson magnesium case that also has cut out the traditional GMC mounting. Here's the story as GN7 relates from another forum:

*******************************************************************************
Jerk, this requires a little explaining, so sit tight. The first mag blowers were not cast because they were lighter. That was a side benefit. The reason for them back in the day was for the reason Steelcomp ask some time ago about billet rotors and billit cases. Do the same materials gall easier, than if the case cast. I believe yes. I May be wrong, but the idea is plausable. When the rotors and the case are both cast, the answer is yes. Not plausable, FACT!

The first mag cases were cast at GM by Ohio George Montgomery, who worked at GM on the night shift and was able to get someone to pull this off. (Sneaky) Pete Robinson machined them and they both had mag case blowers long before anyone else caught on. They both painted the cases to hide them. The reason was they could fit them tighter and if the rotors touched the cases, it didn't do as much harm to the case, and the rotor took most of it. Back them they didn't strip the rotors, and if you look at a stock GM rotor, there is a rib right where they strip them today. That rib was the sealing edge. If they wore the edge down, they replaced the rotor which was fairly cheap back then. Specially if you worked for GM and you were a racer.

"Today, with teflon stripping(really just bumpers)the ONLY benfit is weight. As to how you should fit it. You shouldn't. You should turn the thing over to someone that knows mag blowers, and you tell them the usage. Not some one that says yeah, there all the same and I do this all the time. Someone like Littlefield, or RBS superchargers. Or, set the thing so loose it just doesn't matter and live with the boost you get. It just doesn't get any simpler than that.

*******************************************************************************

Kalitta had unlimited Ford $ to get those lightweight mag cases.  I do think Kalitta's early SOHC success also got Ohio George to add the SOHC to his Willy's coupe and later the Mustang. 
« Last Edit: August 14, 2014, 09:03:24 AM by machoneman »
Bob Maag