Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Member Projects / Re: 69 Ranchero R code
« Last post by MeanGene on Today at 12:03:46 PM »
It kinda sounds like the familiar story of a Chebbie- infused shop trying to wing it through an FE build using what they know works on a Chebbie. Anyone with much performance FE experience would know that those size valves won't go in a 390 block. Starting from scratch on how to do a strong FE many times ends up with some nice parts getting boogered up as the builder tries to make it into a Chebbie. Too many FE- savvy shops out there- they are just different than Chebbies
2
Member Projects / Re: 69 Ranchero R code
« Last post by Heo on Today at 11:38:55 AM »
Well the plot has thickened yet again ! Had the engine all together and up on the dyno set timing and just checking things over pulled dipstick and found "frothy" oil, was running 6 qts in 7qt pan as a test. Added extra qt to no avail.
 So here is what has happened over many weekends. Ended up finding that pump was pushing oil out at input shaft and "froth" there.
Reworked an old pump and put all back together, oil pressure was down about 20 psi running on drill which made us happier was about 70 psi before on drill. My buddy was running it later in the week as he tries not to offend neighbors with dyno runs after a certain time in evenings. Checked the oil and found water in oil checked her over and came up with manifold leak in one corner. So machined manifold to set more uniform and figured it was fixed. I had went down and spent a day cleaning the gunk out of everything and re assembling. Again he had it running later in week and found water in oil. So took her off the dyno as he had another engine coming in for testing. Made some block off plates for water jacket and found the real culprit a crack in valley above a couple lifter bores. Hairline crack but I decided we aren't attempting any repairs on that block.
 So yesterday went down and disassembled that engine inspecting for anything that could have been damaged, no issues thankfully.
 Loaded my original 428 block up and gauged the bores to see where we were with them. Ordered new pistons to work with the stroker kit for these bores. Once they arrive can finish machine this block and get it all back together.
 It's been an interesting time with all of this.

I had a 390 block that was cracked there. It did not show up on pressure test. could idle it no water in oil but as soon as i steped on it there was water in the oil
Discovered the crack when i was grinding on the block, the grinding dust formed a line along the crack like magnafluxing
3
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: 1999 Ranger clutch bleeding problem
« Last post by Heo on Today at 11:27:58 AM »
I finally figured out why I couldn’t get the hydraulic clutch system to bleed on my 1999 Ranger. 

The reservoir had a rubber insert that I thought was a filter to keep dirt out of the system.  I kept the filter filled while I tried to bleed the system.  The “filter” was not filter it was a rubber isolator to keep air out away from the fluid.  When I removed the “filter” to clean it I found that there was no fluid under it. 

As soon as I added oil it saw bubbles coming out of the line.  Bleeding the system was easy after that.

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D I bought a Mercedes clutch mastercyl (aftermarket) that dont had the inlet drilled deep enough so no fluid enterd the master
that was a pain in the but to blead
4
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Jegs Order Cancellation
« Last post by mike7570 on Today at 11:13:26 AM »
I have the Quicktime bellhousing on my 428 with a C-4 trans. There is no access to tighten the torque converter nuts so I just drilled an access hole a little larger than the socket I needed through the 1 piece spacer/cover  in line with the converter studs. No problem with installing.
5
Member Projects / Re: 69 Ranchero R code
« Last post by hbstang on Today at 10:00:00 AM »
well that sucks! but fe engines are known for many problems with 50 plus year old blocks.also what heads are you running?and maybe pressure test the 428 block ?
6
Private Classifieds / Re: Wanted: Valve springs
« Last post by 6667fan on Today at 09:23:37 AM »
Hey Doug,
I have a used set of Comp 930-16 springs. (1.550)

They were set up at 330/120 with a hydro roller when I used them.
7
The pitting is what will bite you.  All the drill bit tests in the world won't tell you where the thin spots are.   And even a sonic test won't tell you everything.  I've ruined some good blocks before, even ones that tested thick, by getting greedy on the bore size. 
8
I have a 428CJ "C" scratch numbers matching engine that I just bored to +.030" over, and did a fresh sonic test that has cylinder walls capable of +.065" overbore and still have at least .125" everywhere.  The block is dated 8G23 which should be a '68.5 dated engine.  I believe that those real CJs have decent cylinder wall thicknesses remaining if the owners used antifreeze in their engines from the beginning.  Joe-JDC

I sonic check a few too and the C scratch is almost always head and shoulders over the early X, A, CI, and CX in thickness and consistency.  The later CI/CX can be as thick, but often inconsistent in core location, X and A tend to be a little thinner.  I agree with you though, if everyone would have used good antifreeze, things would be much easier.  I had one Mexican 302 casting that was thick for a Windsor, but rusted from the inside, sonic checked good, but I poured a little gas in the water jacket because I saw a shadow and it weeped.  Pitting can be bad
9
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Jegs Order Cancellation
« Last post by hwoods on Today at 07:39:44 AM »
after almost one year, order placed on June 30-2023, Performance Automatics Cancelled my order for a PA26390  bellhousing, C4 Trans to FE engine.


I was given multiple ship dates since then, but wanted the part.  I thought it was a good price basis what I was seeing from anyone that claimed to have one available to ship.  I have a Qucktime bellhousing, but believed the PA bellhousing offered better access to the torque convertor than the Quicktime.

I had in the past even reached out direct to PA, but they would never respond to me.
10
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: 1999 Ranger clutch bleeding problem
« Last post by bsprowl on May 22, 2024, 08:42:55 PM »
I finally figured out why I couldn’t get the hydraulic clutch system to bleed on my 1999 Ranger. 

The reservoir had a rubber insert that I thought was a filter to keep dirt out of the system.  I kept the filter filled while I tried to bleed the system.  The “filter” was not filter it was a rubber isolator to keep air out away from the fluid.  When I removed the “filter” to clean it I found that there was no fluid under it. 

As soon as I added oil it saw bubbles coming out of the line.  Bleeding the system was easy after that.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10