Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - allrightmike

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16
196
FE Technical Forum / Re: Someone needs to fess-up
« on: November 16, 2019, 07:49:36 AM »
   Is that a blower drive pulley of the front of the crank?


Mike.

197
FE Technical Forum / Re: Street engine cam timing
« on: November 10, 2019, 05:21:50 PM »
  Once again I really do appreciate your generosity of knowledge. The engine that is going in my Starliner is a 427 10.5 comp. comp. 282S Iron heads single plane EFI 411 gearvenders and converter to be determined. Being a heavy car I was considering setting cam advanced a couple degrees but after reading the response I will go straight up at least as a starting point. This will be for street use.

 Mike.


 

198
FE Technical Forum / Street engine cam timing
« on: November 10, 2019, 10:35:48 AM »
   Is it still common practice to set cam timing one or two degrees advanced for
a street use engine to allow for a bit of chain stretch or just to pump up low end torque?


Mike.

199
FE Technical Forum / Re: Combustion chamber turbulence
« on: November 07, 2019, 02:30:44 PM »
Concerning the flathead chamber, about 3/4 of the area above the piston is quench so maybe not so large a chamber as it might appear

Mike..

200
FE Technical Forum / Combustion chamber turbulence
« on: November 07, 2019, 07:46:31 AM »
  As I understand it combustion chamber turbulence (call it CCT) helps promote flame propagation and reduces total spark advance requirements. Barney Navarro once told me that flathead Fords only wanted 18-22 degrees total because they had an extremely turbulent chamber. This leads to my question, modern chamber and coordinating piston shapes seem to have very little squish area which would tend to create less turbulence thus slower flame travel thus more spark advance requirement. I know that this is not the case so how do these modern designs create such rapid flame travel?


Mike.

201
FE Technical Forum / Re: Lets talk rod to stroke ratio's...
« on: November 05, 2019, 05:30:27 AM »
  Would wrist pin offset have any significant effect on rod angle and or piston side thrust in an engine with a marginally too short rod?








Mike.

202
FE Technical Forum / Re: Lets talk rod to stroke ratio's...
« on: October 31, 2019, 06:22:15 PM »
   When 347 small block ford stroker cranks came into prominence we saw quite a lot of talk about stroke to rod length issues because this combo had a very short rod and engine life was a concern. Might be why not so much being printed these days. IMO.
Mike.

203
FE Technical Forum / Re: The next guess the horsepower game.....
« on: October 21, 2019, 04:03:46 PM »
450 HP

204
FE Technical Forum / Piston speed
« on: October 20, 2019, 12:57:42 PM »
  Do the old rules about critical piston speed still apply? Seems I recall John Kasse running something like a 4.750 stroke in a four cam ford in the EMC and it really liked to rev. Piston speed at a given rpm must be very high with that much stroke. Yes,no?
Mike.

205
FE Technical Forum / Re: vintage oil
« on: October 20, 2019, 12:44:02 PM »
   People used to say the gray stuff was from running STP in the engine.

206
FE Technical Forum / Re: vintage oil
« on: October 18, 2019, 04:27:38 PM »
   Thanks for the feedback guys. My lawn mower will love this stuff! 

207
FE Technical Forum / vintage oil
« on: October 18, 2019, 09:50:55 AM »
   I have two cases of API service SF oil in cardboard cans that I estimate to be late 80's vintage. One is Shell fire and ice 10W40. The other is Kendall Superb 100 10W40. After break in with proper flat tappet oil would the previously described oil be an acceptable choice? Street 427 comp. 282S single four barrel 10.5 compression.
Mike.

208
FE Technical Forum / One piece rear main seal
« on: October 08, 2019, 07:46:12 AM »
    The July issue of Camaro Craft, sorry, Car Craft Magazine has a 427 FE build. In the article they show a one piece rear main seal from Roush. Has anyone had experience With this part? And how do they get it over the crank flange?

209
FE Technical Forum / Re: Galaxie wiper motor
« on: September 25, 2019, 04:09:26 PM »
   Thanks guys for the info. I do have one of those fuel pumps with the vac. booster, also have a vac. canister for power brakes that I could plumb in. Had no idea Ford changed the wiper timing from parallel to opposed. Seems almost nothing fits a '60 other than another '60 part.

210
FE Technical Forum / Galaxie wiper motor
« on: September 25, 2019, 08:36:13 AM »
    Will a later model ('63-'64) Galaxie electric wiper motor physically fit a '60 Galaxie given the correct switch? I don't think my old vacuum motor will work well with a cammed up engine. Comp. 282s 433 cu. in. single plane.
Mike.

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16