Author Topic: Mushroom Lifter 282S  (Read 4097 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chris401

  • Guest
Mushroom Lifter 282S
« on: January 02, 2014, 07:56:07 AM »
Swapping intakes out I found all my lifters had this surface. Picture isn't the best and lint on surface may be misleading, distorted/damaged surface is only in the circle almost like a water spot. They are all flat and you almost cant feel it. Cam and lifters only have 9,000 miles on them and have been in Rotella Triple protection along with additive. My other solid cam with these lifters don't have this wear. Mia investigated and confirmed my findings.



This normal?

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7406
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Mushroom Lifter 282S
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2014, 08:21:42 AM »
That is definitely NOT normal; I've never seen the bottom of a lifter look like that.  I'd replace those lifters, and I'd also be concerned about the cam.  How do the cam lobes look?

Sounds like you did everything right on the oil side of things.  Probably you just got a bad set of lifters.  Where did the lifters come from?
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

chris401

  • Guest
Re: Mushroom Lifter 282S
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2014, 10:13:22 AM »
It was in a Comp Cam kit I got from a machine shop I no longer use. I'm looking for ricept today. I will just eat it if I have to go through them. All I did was a visual and check gap, all looked good. Engine is being replaced in a few weeks with a cheap rebuild. Only mine will be un painted with new gaskets, silicon visible and empty bearing boxes. Not the Krylon soaked ones we see online.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: Mushroom Lifter 282S
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2014, 12:28:48 PM »
2X it's the lifters. Haven't seen that weird look in person (plenty of bad lifters as Jay noted but they don't look like yours) but I did see one like that posted on another forum awhile ago. The lack of any shiny spot at all seems to indicate poor heat treat, yet it's amazing if that is true you were able to go 9K miles on all 16 lifters. Puzzling, indeed!
« Last Edit: January 03, 2014, 02:14:36 PM by machoneman »
Bob Maag

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Mushroom Lifter 282S
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2014, 08:41:30 AM »
Almost looks as if some additive compound got embedded into the face.  Maybe you can actually get too much zinc with the oil and the additive combined?  In any case I'd be tempted to swap them out.  With 9,000 miles you're most likely well beyond any aftermarket part's normal warranty period so I would not expect much help there.

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3937
    • View Profile
Re: Mushroom Lifter 282S
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2014, 09:07:07 AM »
Look close at the base circle of the cam, if the footprint is very wide, there could be more wear in the cam than you think.  Often you can compare it to one of the other ones to get an idea

As far as reusing it with new lifters, it all depends what I saw on the cam. 
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

chris401

  • Guest
Re: Mushroom Lifter 282S
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2014, 10:59:59 AM »
Ill inspect the cam when I pull engine in a few weeks. I swaped from streetmaster to a 66 S. Will pulling the baffolds out of the PBF valve covers solve adjustable rocker clearance issues? Will it create any unnessisary oil consumtion without pvc baffold?

cammerfe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
    • View Profile
Re: Mushroom Lifter 282S
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2014, 12:59:50 PM »
If I go dig in the right box, I'm sure I can come up with several sets of shell-style lifters from twenty to forty years ago. And I believe at least some of them will exhibit the same sort of 'looks' as the picture.

When set on a flat surface (such as a piece of plate glass) is the very slightly convex surface of the contact end of a new lifter still perceptible?

KS

chris401

  • Guest
Any thoughts on baffle removal for stock vc? (above)
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2014, 03:08:00 PM »
The 4 that I checked were still flat, the rest were visualy checked. What Barry said made some sense on too much zinc. When I check the cam Ill post what I find and get with you on lifters.
Thanks