Author Topic: rear wheel hp,toploader vs c6  (Read 7248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cammerfe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
Re: rear wheel hp,toploader vs c6
« Reply #30 on: January 02, 2018, 01:53:51 PM »
Kevin---

As you might imagine, I have followed this particular subject with more than a bit of interest. You wrapped it all up very succinctly!

Thank you.

KS

fryedaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1253
    • View Profile
Re: rear wheel hp,toploader vs c6
« Reply #31 on: January 02, 2018, 03:29:33 PM »
a lot of good info.thank you
1966 comet caliente 428 4 speed owned since 1983                                                 1973 f250 ranger xlt 360 4 speed papaw bought new

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3853
    • View Profile
Re: rear wheel hp,toploader vs c6
« Reply #32 on: January 02, 2018, 04:27:19 PM »

I'm with Drew on this. I always cringe when I see something like that old Car Craft article because forever after one part of it it gets repeated as "fact" without any thought into what were the testing procedures, any qualifiers the article might have mentioned, or other factors, like Drew mentioned, that might affect the "real world" outcome that was intended, like will my race car run quicker?

I actually agree but LOVE to post that now old article!

Why, one may ask?

Simply because I'm trying to draw out much more modern, compresensive and track-tested articles on the very same subject, rear wheel hp notwithstanding. So far no takers nor articles.......
Bob Maag

fryedaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1253
    • View Profile
Re: rear wheel hp,toploader vs c6
« Reply #33 on: January 02, 2018, 04:41:41 PM »
the original question was comparing a c6 to a top loader,not other automatics.but still a lot of great info and opinions
1966 comet caliente 428 4 speed owned since 1983                                                 1973 f250 ranger xlt 360 4 speed papaw bought new