Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Joe-JDC

Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 100
1096
FE Technical Forum / Re: Thinking about casting some valve covers...
« on: December 15, 2016, 10:29:08 AM »
Those H/M valve covers in Brent's picture are very FE looking and without the H/M logo, they would be great looking on any vehicle with a FE.

On edit, Jay a valve cover like the CJ but with a .300-.400 taller top to fit over the roller rocker arms from T&D, Jessel, HS, etc. would be very cool.   Joe-JDC

1097
FE Technical Forum / Re: BBM blocks
« on: December 14, 2016, 12:30:43 PM »
Personally, I don't think it is right to pay ahead of time for something that is not ready to sell.  I had to do that for the tunnel wedge, and I had some harsh words spoken to me about my questioning the whole situation.  I also have a question if it is legal to require a pre-payment for something that is not readily available.  The quality is good, but is sure makes it seem that a business is working on credit when they require a prepaid order.  Be careful how you spend your hard earned credit.  Joe-JDC

1098
FE Technical Forum / Re: 462 build: Stage II or Stage III or....?
« on: December 13, 2016, 10:36:57 PM »
At that power level and cubic inch, stay with the Stage II heads.  The ones I have flowed are in the 330+cfm range, and for the price the additional flow with Stage III heads would only help with a camshaft over .700" lift.  Also, the larger ports would more than likely be down on torque for any street duty. JMO, but you asked. Joe-JDC

1099
FE Technical Forum / Re: BBM Heads-Block////Blue Thunder intakes-Heads
« on: December 12, 2016, 10:17:49 PM »
Haven't spoken with Art personally that I am aware of, but I have friends who have.  He casts a lot of parts for other engine families besides the FE, and they sell quite well.  Demand is always a key factor on determining what to cast, stock, or warehouse.  Maybe if someone would place an order for 50-100 manifolds it would get his attention and speed things up.  Takes money to make things happen in this economy.  Just saying---Joe-JDC 

1100
I bought two of the Edel 14053s with two tuning kits for dyno testing.  My intakes are the Edelbrock 255 8V, and Ford ECG-D 8V, both of which I have extensively ported and flow balanced as much as possible.  I have spacers matched to the intakes, and hopefully they will perform as well as the Mummert 4V, or better.  The Edelbrock 255 that I ported for Ted Eaton's intake shootout series made the best power over all the other 8V intakes tested, before the new Mummert TR.  Joe-JDC 

1101
You guys are scaring me, I just purchased a pair of 600 Edelbrocks for a 8V intake on my Y block, and I figured they would run decent on the street.  Carb spacing made the choice for me.  I hope they work, will be testing them on the dyno when the engine is finished.  Joe-JDC

1102
FE Technical Forum / Re: Sheet Metal Intake on Tunnel Port Intake Adapter
« on: November 29, 2016, 10:23:03 AM »
The ports are enlarged to compensate for the tube, but you could fill the floors by cleaning them, roughing them up to give the epoxy a rough texture to cling to, and fill the floors at least a half inch all the way to the short turn.  You can do that by running a piece of wide tape all the way across the face of the head, and doubling it for strength, then tilting the head so that the short turn is level with the top of the tape.  Fill each port until they run over the short turn, and let set up.  Do both heads the same way.  After the epoxy takes a hard set, you can shape it anyway you desire, and I would recommend a rough (36-40 grit) or even use a carbide, or stone,  to rough up the intake ports.  Do not polish them.  If you know someone who can port them, they can actually fill the ports more and increase the short turn height, giving a much faster velocity and actually increase the flow potential of the heads.   I have ported several sets of heads for other brands of engines that flow in the 280-290 cfm range that make ~600 hp, so the TP is capable of much more with some matching of parts.  Joe-JDC

1103
For anyone interested, I just saw this pickup in person, and it is absolutely beautiful.  The underside is as clean as the topside.  Joe-JDC

1104
FE Technical Forum / Re: Sheet Metal Intake on Tunnel Port Intake Adapter
« on: November 28, 2016, 10:52:32 PM »
Jay:  On the venturi, I was referring to the two carb spacers he is using for placement of the carbs.  The typical 4150/4160 Holleys are 1 3/4" butterflies.  Also, with a round port, you only need ~80% of the valve diameter for optimum flow which would 1.800" inches, or just over 1 3/4" intake runner size at the head opening/intake exit.  Anything more than that will lose velocity and be down on torque until the rpms build enough to keep the velocity strong.  I recently watched a dyno test of a Cleveland that had killer CHI heads, and an intake that was large enough to literally stick your arm down the ports.  The dyno operator tried everything he knew how to load the engine at 34-3500 rpms, and it simply would die because the airflow was too slow to take the load.  Even went up to 4500 rpm and still no loading.  Worked on the tune, worked on the ignition, worked on the EFI, and had two Super Flow technicians try every trick in the book to get good clean pulls.  Two days wasted.  Installed a different Cleveland with CHI heads, smaller intake, and instant 750+ hp.  My point is that with a stock 427 TP, or even 454 TP, those ports are going to be lazy until the rpms come up.  Your 585 SOHC with a 2.350/2.400/2.450 intake valve would be just about perfect at 1.960-2.000" tubes at head entrance.  JMO, but that is my past experience.  Joe-JDC

1105
FE Technical Forum / Re: Sheet Metal Intake on Tunnel Port Intake Adapter
« on: November 27, 2016, 10:15:24 PM »
I started to answer this morning, but decided to wait and see what develops with the answers.  Not trying to be a naysayer, but you are building an intake that uses a 1 3/4" venturi going into what looks like over 2" diameter round tube.  Unless you intend to install Dominators and spin it to very high rpms, I think you are way too big.  Whatever your heads flow, whether a mild porting of 340 cfm, or radical at ~370 cfm, you only need a runner size for those intakes that is about 1 3/4" diameter at the head, and only slightly larger in the plenum for a small taper.  You also will need to contour the opening into the ports quite a bit to prevent any turbulence and loss of flow.  A smooth tube that is 1 3/4" diameter will flow over 400 cfm in case anyone is doubtful.  We build things too large for optimum filling in my opinion.  Otherwise, have fun, and keep us posted on the results after you get it running.  Joe-JDC

1106
FE Technical Forum / Re: Engine mounts
« on: November 27, 2016, 10:03:51 PM »
I raced a '63 center oiler 427 block at 452 cubic inches in my '69 Mach I for many years using the two bolt holes and a strap on the left front of the block.  Grade 8 bolts through the motor mounts with double nuts, and no more broken motor mounts or vibrations.  Never broke the block or mount.  Joe-JDC

1107
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Way OT engine question about 335 M engines.
« on: November 27, 2016, 11:32:20 AM »
I built a 351M using a 400 crankshaft, with ported set of 2V heads, Holley Street Dominator intake with mild gasket match, Holley 600, headers, and good dual exhaust with crossover pipe, Comp Cams H268 camshaft with matching springs, etc., hardened pushrods, guide plates, roller rocker arms with rocker arm bosses milled for screw in studs, and I was able to tow a 6000# trailer with my '78 all over the USA.  Would rev past 6000 rpm with ease, but not much to be gained by doing so.  Very strong and took the abuse of two sons finishing high school as a daily driver.  Had 4 speed OD manual transmission that was supposedly junk, but lived quite well as a tow transmission, and daily driver.  Joe-JDC

1108
FE Technical Forum / Re: New Trick Flow FE cylinder heads & Intake
« on: November 02, 2016, 12:09:14 AM »
Are they really TFS, or did they CNC those Chinese copies of the Edelbrock heads?  Joe-JDC

1109
FE Technical Forum / Re: Mystery oil consumption
« on: October 27, 2016, 10:42:46 PM »
Just about put money on the PCV system sucking it out and burning it.  There are different PCV valves with differing flow rates.  Does the system have a mesh strainer/separator installed in the PCV/road draft tube location?  Valley tin installed?  Joe-JDC

1110
FE Technical Forum / Re: Please help me guys! Knocking and gurgling.
« on: October 27, 2016, 09:07:20 AM »
Sounds like you have way too much compression for 91 octane gasoline, and your timing is advancing too much.  A quick check would be to fill the tank with 93-94 octane and see if the knocking/pinging goes away, or is lessened.  If so, then you need to totally re-curve, re-time your engine and use only the best gasoline.  Joe-JDC

Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 100