Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 1968galaxie

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 21
1
I didn't even think of that when I asked Jay if I could hang my Cleveland results, sort of an obvious and fair option.  My email to him was actually, "where did the non-FE dyno page go? " But it never existed.  Not sure why I thought it did

It does exist:
FE Power Forums »FE Power Forums »Non-FE Discussion Forum
https://fepower.net/simplemachinesforum/index.php?board=3.0

2
I agree also that there are "proprietary" components/ideas to an engine build.
Brent certainly has his ideas and others do as well - That is what makes this hobby (or profession) fun.

Is this forum used by individuals to advertise their private business? Of course.
Same happens on Yellow Bullet, Speed talk and every other forum.
It is a quick and cheap way to advertise -

I do think non-FE builds, dyno tests, information etc.. should be posted on the NON-FE discussion sub- forum.
Calling out members of the forum as trolls for suggesting this is crazy@!







3
You rarely agree with any of the "older" crowd on any FE forum.

Cheers.




4
A new sub forum labeled "Non-FE Dyno Results" would certainly help.
Flathead forums do not showcase FE's.
Pontiac forums do not showcase sbc or BBC's.

Many, many have left this once awesome forum. Now it's dominated by half a dozen users.
Again, sad to see.

5
Minimal specs will be given - as this is a blatant form of FREE ADVERTISING on this FE forum.

No wonder there are less and less users on this once busy forum.

Very sad to see.

6
I am not sure why the "FE Engine Dyno Results" is being used to showcase other engines.
Perhaps Jay should flag these and remove them - or create another posting area for "other engines"

Directly from the first post in this section:

This board is for posting information on the dyno results you have for your FE engine.  I have put a suggested format below, and put a couple of example engines on the board to start with.  You can copy the format from this sticky, and paste it into your post, and then fill in the information.  If you don't have all the info (very few people will), don't sweat it, just fill in what you have.  If you have a photo of the engine, either on or off the dyno, please post that also.  Comments always welcome.  Hopefully this board will turn into a useful repository of FE engine data.

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: Speedmaster latest theft of property video
« on: April 12, 2024, 10:44:38 AM »
Thank you for this.
A lawsuit should be filed by Broader - copying a product is one thing - but then using a company logo on the copied part too?
Tells me everything I need to know about crapmaster products.

8
FE Technical Forum / Re: max spring pressure with aluminum heads
« on: April 07, 2024, 01:11:39 PM »
One must always remember that the spring pressure is not directly below the attaching rocker shaft bolts.
There is that rocker arm which multiplies the 650 lbs (example) of the spring. The rocker arm is a lever, multiplying
the force as seen by the rocker shaft/attaching hardware.

With a 1.76 ratio:
600lbs of force at long end of rocker/lever.
600 lbs X 1.76 = 1056 lbs of force at the short side of the rocker/lever.
The pivot point (shaft centerline) sees 600 + 1056 lbs of force.

No wonder T&D race rockers do not rely on the 4 mounting bolts.

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: Quench
« on: March 30, 2024, 07:18:05 PM »
Quench numbers of 0.036" and factory cast pistons - with cast piston tight clearances and low sub 5000 rpm use certainly might be survivable.
Add RPM, add forged piston clearance, and one just may have a disaster waiting to happen.
Why take a chance?
Like I said - its not my money.

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: Quench
« on: March 30, 2024, 06:47:55 PM »
Tunnelwedge must have been born on the moon - or has zero experience with FE blocks.
I have seen several that had end to end and side to side issues - as Brent has mentioned.
And I haven't worked on many - certainly far, far less than Brent has.
FE blocks from Ford were nowhere near parallel or square - and it didn't matter for 8.5:1(9.5:1 LOL 2bbl) and 9.5:1 (10.5:1 LOL 4bbl) FE's.



11
FE Technical Forum / Re: Quench
« on: March 30, 2024, 03:17:56 PM »
What the heck. Run it tight with the thin gasket.
Rev the hell out of it when back together.
Will be a great experiment (that we don't have to pay for).
If it survives we then know how tight we can run an FE.

All kidding aside - the "increase" in compression ratio with a 0.006" change in quench will not be worth even 1 HP.

Like bearing clearance - a little looser will not hurt. A little too tight will break things.
Your money - you choose.



12
FE Technical Forum / Re: engine balance (updated)
« on: March 25, 2024, 07:38:21 PM »
From my research:

"Most stock street engines will run smooth enough if they are balanced to 1 oz. (28 grams), although many late model engines have much tighter factory specifications (as little as 4 to 6 grams). For a high-revving performance application, aim for the recommended 2 grams or less."

Which category would your engine be?


13
FE Technical Forum / Re: piston skirt clearance
« on: March 19, 2024, 11:41:49 AM »
The 0.0028" to 0.0035" clearance specs are Minimum clearances!
I think you are missing the minimum part.
Just like bearing clearances, I never set to minimum.
I have seen many examples of damaged piston skirts from tight clearances.
As I mentioned a safe clearance for me would be 0.004+ not a bit less.
0.005" on one cylinder, not an issue at all.

14
FE Technical Forum / Re: piston skirt clearance
« on: March 18, 2024, 12:52:59 PM »
Run it!

From The Autotec 4032 piston instructions:

Applications Bore Range Min. Clearance
SB Applications 4.000-4.200 .0025-.0035+
BB Applications 4.200-4.600 .0035-.0045+

These are minimum values. You are at the minimum recommended on 7 cylinders.
I like to be a little above minimum recommendations. For me 0.0045" would be my happy place.
I would be honing the 7 other cylinders for more clearance - most certainly any that were below 0.035"


15
FE Technical Forum / Re: piston skirt clearance
« on: March 16, 2024, 08:42:05 PM »
My old 390 built in the 80's has/had the TRW 2292F 0.030" pistons.
The skirt clearance was 0.009"
Ran that way for many, many hard run miles.
Had 5.14 traction lock rear - saw plenty of rpm on a daily basis - was my daily driver through university.
The 390 sat on an engine stand for 25 years - took it apart last year. The piston skirts look brand new!

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 21