Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - machoneman

Pages: 1 ... 254 255 [256] 257
3826
I'm still not eating my hat until Jay can verify what happened later on. I will keep some real maple syrup handy though.......... :D

3827
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Rear gear set for Drag Week
« on: August 27, 2011, 08:01:08 AM »
I'd buy a used NASCAR gearset next time around. But, I'll note there are two kinds generally available. One looks like a std. gearset and may/may not have all outer surfaces polished.

The other has a heavily modified ring gear that has the backside profiled milled & swiss-cheesed, so to speak, and ring gear bolt bosses have been scalloped to save weight and reduce inertia. I don't think this type of gearset would be useful to a drag racer where more mass equals more strength.  

Here's a pic of a scalloped gear. Not that easy to see but blow up the pic about 150% and it becomes much more obvious. Amazing too one can buy a whole 9" center for just under $500! 

http://www.rcrdriveline.com/6raniinfoces.html

3828
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Rear gear set for Drag Week
« on: August 25, 2011, 01:31:44 PM »
No Drag Week participant here but....see what Mark Williams says about Richmond's street versus race gears

http://www.markwilliams.com/ringpin.aspx

I've run both over the years (mainly Richmond) but would not hesitate to run the softer race gears in a car that will see occasional to moderate drag use. What really makes a difference is someone with a heavy car, stick, lots of hp, lots of slick and a dump-the-clutch launch at WOT. The lack of a trans brake and the somewhat forgiving nature of an auto trans has helped Jay a bunch, I'm sure.  Btw, the 'softer' material in race gears has only marginally lower Rockwell numbers and the material spec is pretty close too....it's not that much different than street gears.

3829
My take is......it's the dyno.

Read the post earlier this a.m. and thought about it for a few hours. Engines that far down on power (-16% or so by my math) must exhibit some pretty distinctive issues that even w/o a dyno one could detect like lazy acceleration (how about acceleration per second now versus last year's data?), fuel consumption, total timing, spark quality, etc. all of which you checked.  Oh, and an oil pan that killed 150 hp? I don't think so.  

If the engine isn't bucking, backfiring, running lean, burning up coils, et al and the rpms accelerate like a banshee while NOT under the dyno's load (don't know if you can do this on your dyno stand but....) methinks the problem lies in the one part of the absorber you could not get apart. Your idea of quickly whipping the motor, as is, on your local shop's dyno is a capital idea  :)  

I'll eat my hat (or yours) otherwise!


    

3830
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: New/Old guy
« on: August 04, 2011, 02:24:13 PM »
Hey Bill,

Good to see you're still kickin'.....over here at least! Glad to see your post.

3831
Jay, here's your ride for 2012...all the work done already! Would be cool to see a real SOHC in it methinks  ;D

http://blogs.hotrod.com/2012-ford-mustang-competition-roller-available-1765.html

3832
FE Technical Forum / Re: Noisy lifters at hot idle
« on: July 28, 2011, 09:26:13 AM »
When you swapped in the new oil pumps (HD or Std) did the hot idle oil pressure change? From your reply, it appears not to have changed. If so, I'd suspect as Jay mentioned internal oil leaks (from a variety of sources) that are bleeding off oil before it hits the lifters. The 20-25 psi hot idle is pretty low for a new build and a new pump, if that was the issue, should have raised your psi at both  ends of the scale.

As for options, one way to eliminate the lifter variable is to pop the intake and replace them. Kinda' iffy using new lifters on a broken in cam but it's been done before. I'd also make sure you get a good quality Johnson lifter (see link, others also sell them) as it is possible the supplied lifters were cheapies.

http://www.flatlanderracing.com/lifters-427feshell.html

But, it seems a better track would be to yank the engine and tear it down for a full inspection of all clearances and a check for any cracks in the cam tunnel-to-main bearing saddle areas.
  

3833
FE Technical Forum / Re: Thoughts on my planned combo
« on: July 22, 2011, 06:12:45 AM »
Perhaps Jay can comment on the tri-power intakes limits but it's the cork in the bottle, for sure.  Hate to see all those great parts hp limited by the alleged cool factor of three deuces but hey, go for it.

3834
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Check out my Barn Find '32 Ford!
« on: July 19, 2011, 11:42:26 AM »
Very cool find and how lucky! It almost screams to be in a Hollywood movie, like a re-make of the Untouchables or a 30's era gangster movie.

But please, no Chevy engine!

3835
Yah! That Joel is quite a pal, even for a Hemihead!

3836
so we can chip in and air drop some refreshments to keep that Shelby work going....LOL! Light or regular?  :D

http://www.startribune.com/politics/blogs/125490398.html

3837
FE Technical Forum / Very cool!
« on: July 01, 2011, 08:12:41 AM »
Nice piece. What was it run on and how well did it do?

3838
The Road to Drag Week 2011 / Car's name: Jason
« on: June 27, 2011, 10:43:34 AM »
For Jason and the Argonauts whom the gods put through numerous trials before final success. That or Hercules, once again for all the trials and tribulations :)

Nice! 

3840
Seems like we've been here before. The benefits of the plastic intake design though are many...wonder how hard it would be, using the old PSE aluminum base, to cast-up a composite intake using much more modern 351C intakes (CHI, Trickflow etc.) with the finished aluminum version as a mold pattern? Maybe you were right Jay, a whole new set of FE intake comparos may be in the offing.

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/1107phr_afr_titan_series_intake_manifolds/index.html




Pages: 1 ... 254 255 [256] 257