I lost track of what this build is LOL
However, I do agree, the Molnars are really nice, and if they will deliver as soon as you want, then go for it. All the benefits of a modern rod and lighter than the SCAT, and really it's as close to a "big dollar" connecting rod as you can get for an FE without paying a big premium. Strokers have more choices. Downsides, if you don't have one, you'll need a torque/angle style torque wrench
Nothing wrong with the SCAT, but, it's a sledgehammer, they are heavier. If you need a rebalance, it can take more to correct. The nice thing about them is availability, strength, standard torque procedures, and like the Molnars (and all capscrew rods) the cap is located by a bushing instead of the shank of the bolt. Not to many aftermarket rods rely on a bolt to locate the cap like a stocker. Overkill? Depends on the power and RPM you end up turning.
For a long time I have wished they'd add a capscrew I-beam to the SCAT FE line up, but unless we all start squealing I don't see it happening. It would be a good match for what I think you are doing.
The compression is a thing to watch though, I haven't measured as many TFS chambers as Brent, but have had a few through here, and 2 sets on the shelf that I recently measured. They have all come in at 69.7-69.9 cc, that's quite a bit smaller than a Ford or other aftermarket head. I would add another thing to check though, if you are running Speed Pro pistons, look very close at radial valve clearance too. They have both shallow and small diameter valve reliefs, and to add to the confusion, left and right banks tend to be slightly different when installed with notch forward
Too many cooks in the kitchen here though, just remember, plan the flight, fly the plan.... Since you are taking a knee waiting for rods, maybe mock it all up and check clearances, to include valve, deck height, intake fitment, thrust, mains, etc, and then when the rods come in you'll have everything ready