Well, two lessons learned here.
1 - When you don't verify something, you can get bit
2 - When you go cheap, you increase the chances of it going wrong
Brent recommended seeing where I was with the heads bolted up, measuring from the bottom, I trust him like a brother and didn't have a smoking gun, so I did it, but really didn't expect it to pan out, I was wrong! Sent Barry the pics too, he saw the odd marks and the numbers below and agrees that it would be noisy. I appreciate both of their advice.
Despite me wanting to hate the pistons, looks like it likely is the block, and likely my "reblock" would have worked if I did my normal block prep (sonic check, square deck, torque plate hone). I guess the good thing is that the Probe pistons have been checked 8 ways to Sunday and a cause was found, so they are good pistons, just won't work in my block.
When I replaced the block knowing it was .0075 clearance, I used a block that was already finished for a buddy's 390, it measured at .0045 clearance (no torque plate) and looked nicely done. In the end, I have one of two issues, or both, need to figure it out. But, knowing the shop by buddy uses doesn't have an FE torque plate. it's either just crooked when things are bolted up, or the cylinders are thin and moving around.
1 - Mocked up cylinder to see how far the piston skirt hung out. Did not hang out very much, .250 max and checking point on skirt never exited bore
2 - Pulled crank, installed heads, torqued caps and heads with head gasket
3 - Checked 6 points on each cylinder from bottom, 3 pin direction and 3 thrust direction, checked bore gauge vs piston after each bore
Summary
- Pin direction - 7 cylinders the same behavior at .0045 to .0055, growing toward bottom of bore, most measurements between .0045 and .005 (one oddball at .005-.006)
- Thrust direction - All 8 cylinders were bigger than pin direction, but 2 cylinders grew bigger as approaching bottom of stroke, 6 cylinders got smaller at the bottom
When I look at cylinder #7 in multiple pics, it is certainly the weirdest, but it's hard for me to show you, but it does correlate with the numbers. Numbers in bold are outside of Probe's limits, and all of #7 is bold because it is likely the noisiest, but the inconsistency is the odd thing. I put away my tools and went to lick my wounds, but I do intend to pull the heads and crank and do this again, just to see how far off the numbers are without the heads. When I originally asked the question, I took a lot of measurements, but not as many as I did here, and not in as regimented locations. My hunch is that numbers will get closer, but when I map it out there will still be something to see
In the end, if the cylinders are thick enough, my intention is to torque plate hone at a minimum oversize and put a set of 4032s to fit maybe shifting compression height up to 1.335 for a zero deck, but that is likely overkill
Cylinder Clearances
Top/Middle/Bottom - Thrust direction----------Top/Middle/Bottom - Pin direction
#1
.0065/.0070/.0070----------.0045/.0045/.0045
#2
.0070/.0065/.0060----------.0050/.0050/.0050
#3
.0075/.0070/.0065----------.0045/.0050/.0050
#4
.0070/.0070/.0065----------.0045/.0045/.0045
#5
.0060/.0065/.0065----------.0045/.0050/.0055
#6
.0075/.0070/.0065----------.0045/.0050/.0055
#7
.0080/.0080/.0065----------.0050/.0060/.0060
#8
.0055/.0070/.0070----------.0045/.0050/.0050
One thing I need to point out is, before yesterday, without the heads on, I had absolutely no numbers in the .007 or greater range. I have not been a torque plate nazi, although I like to when I can, if this block checks good for thickness, you won't see me prep one without a plate again.