I will be honest, I don't even think about ethanol. My lawn mower, snow blower and two stroke weed-wacker and blower have never been apart, start first pull and all are at least 10 years old. (OK a little lie, actually the 4 strokes fire first pull, the 2-strokes are 2 pulls full choke, then 1 pull no choke LOL)
My Mustang got EFI in 2009, and got a fresh fuel filter in 2013 and the old one looked new. Pulled the bowls on the 1000 Holley after it was run 3 years on E10 and whatever else I threw in the tank pre-Mustang EFI, looked new, so I put it on the 445 truck without even a fresh kit.
I also live in Nebraska, the land of ethanol, and people claim our E10 is likely 15-20 and not a regular mix, I don't know. However, I also don't even consider the tuning to be that significant unless somehow you are able to tune to a knife's edge.
I do add Stabil to my tanks each winter, and the the car sits in a sealed bag, the truck usually sits at home in a garage that swings in temp from 65 to whatever outside temp is, and the lawn equipment gets no maintenance at all and sits near the garage door (shame on me LOL, I can't even remember changing the oil in my lawn mower...some engine guy huh?)
That doesn't mean I think ethanol is economical or worth being subsidized at the levels it is, but as a fuel, for performance, it doesn't bother me at current mixes
I am going math geek on you now, keep in mind I used E15 for a bigger difference in the math, E10 would be slightly closer to gas. This math also doesn't account for viscosity or whatever "gasoline" is, as there are different mixes and I just found the most repeatable values I could for power production I could in 10 minutes of looking.
- If the BTU value for gas is 116K, and pure ethanol is 77K, a 15% mix of gas/ethanol (E15) would mathematically be 110K (all rounded)
- That difference is 5%
- A Holley 80 jet, with a hole size of .093, has an area of .00679
- A 5% increase to supply the same BTU value of fuel is an area of .00712, that is about equal to a Holley 83 jet
- Now, 3 jet sizes can be significant, but, if you consider a stock Holley build to be a bit on the rich side, and you realize that all the circuits can be a little fat, making up the difference is likely in the carb already, and as long as you aren't running on the lean side, you are likely just fine.
- Again, the math does not account for alcohol flowing more easily (which I would think it would but I could not find a value for "pump gas" viscosity) and the actual make up of the gasoline we call "pure" has quite a range, so who knows
****I built this on a spread sheet, so I couldn't help myself, the percentage difference for E10 would be 3% which equates to just the low side of the 83 jet. Pretty much the same