Author Topic: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long  (Read 4212 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

615STEELE

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« on: March 23, 2018, 01:13:08 PM »
Been lurking for a while, first time to post. Just wondering where the bottle neck is on my engine, and what would make the most improvement. engine info:  428 +.030, 268 comp cam, edelbrock heads, flat top speed-pro pistons, .008 in hole, edelbrock intake, Quick fuel 780 vs, CJ exhaust manifolds with 2.5 inch exhaust. Vacuum runs 13 in at idle, which seems low for power brakes, never have been able to raise it , changed intake from PI to edelbrock no change in vacuum. Didn't degree cam.  Street car only no stats other than seat of pants.  Was a GTA, installed a sb toploader with truck bell last year.



1966 fb mustang, 351w
1966 f100, 351w

RJP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 395
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2018, 01:27:26 PM »
How many miles on the engine?

Rory428

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1007
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2018, 02:06:23 PM »
Need more info, WHICH Edelbrock intake? Several models to chose from. What gear ratio, close or wide ratio toploader? What does the car weigh? If you have taken the can to the dragstrip, what did it run, & what are your expectations? If not raced, what are you using to determine that there is a bottleneck"? What ignition and timing spec? I agree, 13 in at idle seems pretty low for a Comp 268H, my 69 Mach 1 428CJ had that cam and stock CJ exhaust manifolds, and had 17-18 in.
1978 Fairmont,FE 427 with 428 crank, 4 speed Jerico best of 9.972@132.54MPH 1.29 60 foot
1985 Mustang HB 331 SB Ford, 4 speed Jerico, best of 10.29@128 MPH 1.40 60 foot.
1974 F350 race car hauler 390 NP435 4 speed
1959 Ford Meteor 2 dr sedan. 428 Cobra Jet, 4 speed Toploader. 12.54@ 108 MPH

615STEELE

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2018, 05:18:13 PM »
Engine has around 1000 miles,3:50 rear , rpm intake, It runs good. but rough idle. no track time.  Any take off above idle will break the tires loose.  Just  am wondering if my combo would support a cam change and add to performance.   I am guessing around 3400#, aluminum waterpump heads and intake.

RJP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 395
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2018, 05:37:29 PM »
A fresh engine will have low vacuum until it is broken in. 1K miles is not enough, get some miles [2500-3K] on the engine and recheck, it should come up to 16-17" which is enough to operate the power brake booster. Changing intakes made no difference, it won't unless it was leaking.  You say there is a 'bottleneck'... In power/torque? If you can "break the tires loose" at anything above an idle what exactly are you looking for? 

FElony

  • Guest
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2018, 06:44:20 PM »
... You say there is a 'bottleneck'... In power/torque? If you can "break the tires loose" at anything above an idle what exactly are you looking for?

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess Mr. Steele discovered that his engine doesn't wind up as high as he thought it might. The 268 is a good torquey stick, but it really doesn't pull any higher than a stock CJ grind. I had one in an almost identical engine/exhaust car, and it was finished by 5500 or so. The cam I pulled out of there was some badass 580/590 Crane Compucam solid with shell lifters. It was good for 6000 or more. Ironically, the Crane worked the power brake booster just as well as the 268.

Rory428

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1007
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2018, 12:57:41 AM »
My experiance with the 268H was pretty similar to FElonys, pulled well to 5500RPM, or maybe a touch less, but frankly, I kind of like to keep the RPMs kinda low on a FE anyhow.Accentuate the natural torque, and keep the innards INSIDE the oil pan.High RPMs come at a cost, both financialy, and mechanically, and I can`t say I have been disppointed with the results, on the street, or the track. If you can already light up the tires so easily, not sure what you are looking for, but if it was me, the first thing I would do is ditch the iron exhaust manifolds in favor of headers.
1978 Fairmont,FE 427 with 428 crank, 4 speed Jerico best of 9.972@132.54MPH 1.29 60 foot
1985 Mustang HB 331 SB Ford, 4 speed Jerico, best of 10.29@128 MPH 1.40 60 foot.
1974 F350 race car hauler 390 NP435 4 speed
1959 Ford Meteor 2 dr sedan. 428 Cobra Jet, 4 speed Toploader. 12.54@ 108 MPH

615STEELE

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2018, 07:30:30 AM »
Looks like headers will be my next project.  Hope someone makes a set for a power steering car without using the dropping bracket.  Being 70 years old sure makes any project a lot harder these days.  Thanks to all.

JamesonRacing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
  • 1966 - What a great year for FOMOCO
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2018, 08:47:00 AM »
I don't know that I'd be that hasty to replace the CJ manifolds.  They aren't as restricting as you might think on a mildish engine like yours.  I think you have a decent collection of parts, though the cam is milder than I would have used.  I suspect you have more power potential than you think and could benefit from fine tuning what you have.  You shouldn't see that low vacuum and rough idle with the parts you have.

If it were mine, I think I'd look into adding a FiTech injection system in place of the carb and get the tune sorted out with real data.
1966 Fairlane GT, Silver Blue/Black 496/C4 (9.93@133)
1966 Fairlane GT, Nightmist Blue/Black 465/TKO (11.41@122)
1966 Fairlane GTA Conv, Antique Bronze/Black, 418EFI/C6
1966 F250 C/S, Rangoon Red, 445/T19
1965 Falcon Futura 4-door, Turquoise, EF! Z2363/4R70W

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3934
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2018, 09:12:49 AM »
All good advice here. 

Need to know the intake you are running, however, general rules of thumb

1 - Make sure the ignition curve works for the build and make sure you are getting full throttle
2 - Headers and a real good dual exhaust with crossover helps
3 - If you are running a Performer intake, I'd ditch it and get an RPM or Streetmaster/Street Dominator (I may even do this before headers, but on the fence)
4 - After that, or during an intake swap, I'd ditch the 268.  It's really the bottle neck and not enough cam for your use IMHO.  Something like an XE274H as an absolute guess, with the right valve springs and things matched above, will make it a monster and likely be a little less hell on the tires down low

I like the EFI idea, but 216 @ .050 cam is real mild, even with a good set of heads
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

TomP

  • Guest
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2018, 12:27:18 AM »
It needs more cam. If you only did one change that should be it.
Nothing wrong with the RPM intake or carb or heads for that matter.

The exhaust manifolds aren't terrible but headers will make more power. The 3.50 gears are fine if the tranny is the 2.78 first. If it's the 2.32 it is a too tall first gear for my liking.

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2018, 06:12:38 AM »
Rough idle and low vacuum on that mild cam literally screams vacuum leak or retarded cam timing.
I would be checking for both of those before moving ahead on other changes.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2018, 06:39:03 AM »
2X to what Barry said as those were my thoughts too. Warped intake, machined decks, steel locating pin, intake gasket valley side tabs for the OEM gaskets, retarded cam timing are all possibilities.
Bob Maag

wowens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2018, 07:54:24 AM »
X3 for Barry
Woody

615STEELE

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: 67 FAIRLANE HELP Long
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2018, 08:07:20 AM »
I don't think I have a vacuum leak. Pvc and brake booster have been plugged, as well as a manifold and gaskets changed from PI to edel rpm, no change still 13in steady.  Checked with two different gauges.  did not degree cam, always just aligned the dots. If I am a tooth off would it still run ok?  Need to change balancer anyway the 67 PI balancer is wobbling.   Bought a professional products balancer a year ago to replace.  Looks like I need to pull front cover to check cam and if going that far am going to change cam.  Have a 274XE cam in my mustang 351w,  changed from 266 crane , made a different car.  Someone suggested for FE 274 XE, would the edelbrock valve springs handle that cam and do I need to change to adjustable valve train.  Have stock now with POP end stands.  THANKS!